Cost Benefit Analysis of Participatory Natural Resource Management: A study of watershed development initiative in Indian village

Sahu, Santosh (2008): Cost Benefit Analysis of Participatory Natural Resource Management: A study of watershed development initiative in Indian village.

Abstract

Following the Hanumanth Rao committee report Government of India initiated Watershed Development Programmes (WDPs) to improve and sustain productivity of the semiarid regions of the country at higher level. The aim of such initiatives are also to fulfill the needs of rural communities for food, fuel, fodder, and timber as majority of rural people are depending on the natural resource for their livelihood. WDPs are being given importance in the development plans for India and by donor agencies as they promote sustainable use of natural resources and improve the rural economy of India. This paper presents a social cost-benefit appraisal of a watershed development project in Rajasthan, India. The analysis has been done by the primary data collected from the Bichhiwada village and using Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) and sensitivity analyses. The results show that if expected full benefits are realized, the benefits derived from the watershed project are quite high. The findings of this study suggest that watershed development projects initiated to improve the economy and ecology of India's dry and semiarid regions are economically viable and socially desirable.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Watershed Development, Net Present Value, Cost Benefit Analysis, Sensitivity Analysis
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q32 - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

References

1.Agrawal, A., 1997, “Community and conservation: Beyond enchantment and disenchantment”, Working paper no. W971-25, International Forestry Resources and Institutions, Indian University, Bloomington, U.S.A.

2.Chopra Kanchan and Gopal K, Kadekodi, 1993, “Watershed development: A contrast with NREP/JRY”, Economic and Political Weekly 28(26): A61-A67.

3.Chopra Kanchan, 1999, “Evaluation of watershed management programmes in India: A review,” in John Farrington, Cathryn Turton and A.J. James. (eds.), Participatory Watershed Development: Challenges for the Twenty. First Century, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp.30-49.

4.Chopra, K., G.K. Kadekodi and M.N. Murty, 1990, participatory Development: People and Common Property Resources, Sage Publications, New Delhi.

5.Cohen, John m. and Norman T. Uphoff, 1980 “Participation’s place in rural development: seeking clarity through specificity,” World Development, 8(30): 213-235.

6.Dasgupta, P., 1996, “The Economics of the Environment”, Environment and Development Project for Rain fed Areas (NWDPRA) in Maharashtra”, AERC, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune.

7.Deshpande, R.S. and S.R. Nikumbh, 1993, “Treatment of Uncultivated Land Under Watershed Development Approach-Institutional and Economic Aspects”, Artha Vijnana, Vol.35, pp.1-21.

8.Deshpande, R.S. and V. Ratna Reddy, 1991, “Differential impact of watershed based technology: some analytical issues”, Indian journal of Agricultural Economics, 46(30): 261-269.

9.Deshpande, R.S., and Reddy, V.R., 1991, ‘Differential impacts of watershed based technology: Some analytical issues’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.46 No.3: 261-269.

10.Farrington, John, Cathryn Turton and A.J.James, (eds.), 1999, Participatory Watershed Development: Challenges for the Twenty-First Century, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

11.GoI, 2000, “Guidelines for National Watershed Development Project for Rainfed Areas (NWDPRA),” Rainfed Farming Systems Division, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.

12.Kerr, John, 2002a, “Sharing the Benefits of Watershed management in Sukhomajri, India,” in Stefano Pagiola, Joshua Bishop and Natasha landell-Mills, eds., Selling Forest Environment Services: Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, Earthscan, London, pp.63-75.

13.Ramanna, R., 1991, “Watershed Approach to Dry Land Agricultural Development’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.46, No.3, pp.251-60.

14.Reddy, V.R., Reddy, M.G. Galab, S., Soussan, J., Baginski, O.S., 2004, “Participatory Watershed Development in India: Can it Sustain Rural Livelihoods”, Development and Change 35(2): 297-326.

15.Sharma, K., 1995, ‘Micro policies for natural resource management-Marginalisation of poor rural women’, Center for Women’s Development Studies, Occasional Paper No.14, New Delhi: CWDS.

16.Singh, A.J., A.S.Joshi, R.P.Singh and R.Gupta, 1991, “An Economic Appraisal of Kandi Watershed and Area Development Project in Punjab”, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.36, No.3, July-September, pp.287-93.

17.Statistical Abstract of Rajasthan, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

18.Tellor, K.L. 1977, Guide Lines for Watershed Management, FAO Conservation Guide 1, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

19.Watershed Project Report, 1998, Seva Mandir, Udaipur, Rajasthan.

20.Yugandhar, B.N., J. Venkkateswarlu and V. Kochar, 1999, “Watershed Based Development in Arid and Semiarid Areas of Andhra Pradesh”, Journal of Rural Development, Vol.18, No.3, NIRD, Hyderabad.