Antitrust and the competitive structure of the U.S. pulp and paper industry, 1950-1990

Toivanen, Hannes (2005): Antitrust and the competitive structure of the U.S. pulp and paper industry, 1950-1990.

Abstract

National antitrust policies have potentially profound effects on global competitiveness of individual industries. Public policy interventions affecting organizational arrangements within industries, enforcement of commodity standardization, and price competition, as well as the regulation of intellectual property rights, are the major tools by which Government executes antitrust policies. This study documents the frequency, extent, and impact of U.S. antitrust policies toward the pulp and paper industry between 1950 and 1990.

Passage of the Celler-Kefauver Antimerger Act in 1950 marked the beginning of a new antitrust experience across the whole U.S. economy. Yet, the application of the Act required government to forge industry specific standards of competitive structure. The antitrust experience of the pulp and paper industry, and its distinct segments, was particularly industry specific when it came to the enforcement of Celler-Kefauver Act and its consequences. Between 1950 and 1990, antitrust disadvantaged pulp and paper firms whose competitive strategy was based on regional or product specialization. As in other industries, antitrust appeared to encourage successful and growth-seeking paper firms to diversify into new areas of business. Unlike in other industries, successful pulp and paper firms relatively rarely undertook so-called conglomerate mergers, and preferred to diversify and expand into other segments of the forests products industry. In the context of pulp and paper industry, new incentive structures that emanated from antitrust facilitated the rise of large scale forests products giants that resembled each other in terms of strategy and structure.

Antitrust between 1950 and 1990 shaped significantly the competitive structure of the U.S. pulp and paper industry, and probably transformed traditional arrangements for technological learning and the course of technological innovation. Industry’s recent performance and contemporary global competitiveness outlook cannot be understood without reference to its post-World War II antitrust experience.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: pulp and paper industry; antitrust; regulation; political economy; innovation; United States; Competitive structure; industrial organization; celler-kefauer act
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing; K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights

References

Simon N. Whitney, Antitrust Policies. American Experience in Twenty Industries. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund 1958, 330-384.

L. Ethan Ellis, Newsprint. Producers, Publishers, and Political Pressures. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press 1960.

Hannes Toivanen, Historical Perspectives on Contemporary Problems: Organizational Capabilities and Strategy and Structure of Large Pulp and Paper Firms, 1950-1980. Chicago: Tappi Press 2003.

Hannes Toivanen, Learning and Corporate Strategy: The Dynamic Evolution of North American Pulp and Paper Industry, 1860-1960. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology 2004.

Thomas K. McCraw, Prophets of Regulation. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press 1984

Peter Temin and Louis Galambos, The Fall of the Bell System. A Study in Prices and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press 1987

Louis Galambos and Joseph Pratt, The Rise of Corporate Commonwealth. United States Business and Public Policy in the 19th Century. New York: Basic Books 1988

Neil Fligstein, The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1990

Kenneth Lipartito and David B. Sicilia (eds), Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press 2004

Grover J. Daly, The Corrugated Container Industry – A history and Analysis. Chicago: Board Products Publishing Company 1971, 74-75.

David M. Hart, “Antitrust and Technological Innovation in the U.S: Ideas, Institutions, Decisions, and Impacts, 1890-2000.” Research Policy Vol 30:6 (Jul 2001):923-937:

Steven W. Usselman, “Fostering a Capacity for Compromise: Business, Governmnent, and the Stages of Innovation in American Computing.” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, Vol 18, No. 2 (1996):30-39

Michael L. Dertouzos, Richard K. Lester, and Robert M. Solow, Made in America. Regaining The Produdctive Edge. New York: HarperPerennial 1989.

Michael L. Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press 1990;

Martin Pesendorf, “Horizontal mergers in the paper industry.” RAND Journal of Economics Vol 34, No. 3, Autumn 2003, 495-515;

Laurits R. Christensen and Richard E. Caves, “Cheap talk and investment rivalry in the pulp and paper industry.“ Journal of Industrial Economics Vol. 45 (March 1997):1, 47-74.

Annual Report of the Federal Trade Commission For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1957. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office 1957, 33-34;

John A. Stanturf, Robert C. Kellison, F.C. Broerman, and Stephen B. Jones, “Innovation and Forests Industry: Domesticating the Pine Forests of the Southern United States, 1920-1999”. Forest Policy and Economics Vol. 5, Nr. 4 (Dec 2003), 407-410

Annual Report of the Federal Trade Commission For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1959. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office 1959, 36-37;

Annual Report of the Federal Trade Commission For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1951. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office 1951, 41.

Annual Report of the Federal Trade Commission For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1952. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office 1952, 27;

Federal Trade Commission, Docket No. 5883, International Cellucotton Products.

Federal Trade Commission, Docket 6559. Scott Paper Company (1956).

Scott Paper Company v. Federal Trade Commission, 301 F.2d 579 (1962).

Scott Paper Company v. Federal Trade Commission, No. 13, 537 (1964)

Federal Trade Commission, Docket 6180. Crown Zellerbach Corporation.

Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, 296 F.2d 800, (1961).

William Boyd, “The Forest is the Future? Industrial Forestry and the Southern Pulp and Paper Industry Complex,” In: Philip Scranton (ed), The Second Wave. Southern Industrialization from the 1940s to the 1970s. Athens: The University of Georgia Press, 2001, 168-218.

Federal Trade Commission, Docket 6676. International Paper Company (1957)

Eleanor Amigo and Mark Neuffer, Beyond The Adirondacks. The Story of St. Regis Paper Company. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press 1980, 93-120.

United States v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, 264 F. Supp. 439 (1967)

United States v. Von’s Grocery Co., 384 U.S. 270, 277 (1966)

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 317-318 (1962).

Unites States v. Hammermill Paper Co., 429 F. Supp. 1271 (1977).

Unites States v. Hammermill Paper Company, 429 F. Supp. 1271 (1977).

United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours, 353 U.S. 586, 589.

United States v. Pennzoil Co., 252 F. Supp. 92, 971 (W.D. 1965)

FTC v. Consolidated Foods, 380 U.S. 592, 599, 14 L. Ed 2d 95, 85 S. Ct. 1220 (1965)