Ramírez Grajeda, Mauricio and de León Arias, Adrián (2009): Spatial implications of international trade under the new economic geography approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_18076.pdf Download (361kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In 2008, Paul Krugman from Princeton University was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences by the Central Bank of Sweden, for his “analysis of trade patterns and location of economic activity”. In this paper we survey the literature, known as the New Economic Geography (NEG), launched by Krugman (1991). In particular, we focus on four topics: (i) NEG roots, (ii) NEG rationale; (ii) the spatial impact of international trade on global economic imbalances; and (iv) the impact of international trade on urban structure.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Spatial implications of international trade under the new economic geography approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | New Economic Geography; Trade Openness; Agglomeration and Urban Economics. |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity |
Item ID: | 18076 |
Depositing User: | Mauricio Ramirez Grajeda |
Date Deposited: | 26 Oct 2009 09:26 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 14:58 |
References: | Ades, A. F. and Glaeser, E. L. “Trade and Circuses: Explaining Urban Giants.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110 (1), 195-227. Alonso, W. Location and Land Use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964. Alonso-Villar, O. “Large Metropolises in the Third World: An Explanation.” Urban Studies, 2001, 38 (8), 1359-1371. Arthur, B. W. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-in by Historical Events.” Economic Journal, 1989, 99 (394), 116-131. Brakman, S.; Garretsen, H. and Van Marrewijk, C. An Introduction to Geographical Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Brakman, S. and Garretsen, H. “Trade and Geography: Paul Krugman and the 2008 Nobel Prize for Economics.” Spatial Economic Analysis, 2009, 4 (1), 5-23. Chamberlain, E. Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Harvard Economic studies, 1933. Christaller, W. Central Place in Southern German. in Jena Fisher, 1933. Combes, P. P. and Lafourcade, M. “Trade Costs and Regional Disparities in a Model of Economic Geography: Structural Estimation and Prediction for France.” Manuscript, 2004. Da Mata, D; Deichman, U; Henderson, J; Lall, S. and Wang, H. “Determinants of City Growth in Brazil.” NBER, Working Paper 11585, 2005. Davis, D. R. “The Home Market, Trade and Industrial Structure.” American Economic Review, 1998, 88 (5), 1264-1276. Davis, D. and Weistein D. “Bones, Bombs and Break Points.” American Economic Review, 2002, 92 (5), 1269-1289. De la Blache, V. Principes de Géographie Humaine. Paris: Gallimard, 1921. Dixit, A. and Stiglitz, J. “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.” American economic Review, 1977, 67 (3), 297-308. Edwards, S. “Openness, Productivity, and Growth: What Do We Really Know?” Economic Journal, 1998, 108 (447), 383-398. Forslid, R.; Haaland, J. I. and Midelfart Knarvik K. H.“A U-Shaped Europe? A Simulation Study of Industrial Location.” Journal of International Economics, 2002, 57 (2), 273-297. Fujita, M. “Monopolistic Competition and Urban Systems.” European Economic Review, 1993, 37 (2-3), 308-315. Fujita, M. and Thisse, J. F. “Economics of Agglomeration.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1996, 10 (1), 339-378. Fujita, M. and Thisse, J. F. “New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the Occasion of Paul Krugman´s Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2009, 39, 109-119. Fujita, M.; Krugman, P. R. and Venables, A. The Spatial Economics: Cities, Regions and international Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999. Gatica Arreola, L. A and Ramirez Grajeda, M. “The Bell-Shaped Curve of International Trade Openness: A panel Data Test for OECD countries.” Econoquantum, 2006, 3 (1) January, 113-133. Hanson, G. H. “Integration and Location of Activities: Economic Integration, Intraindusty Trade, and Frontier Regions.” European Economic Review, 1996, 40 (3-5), 941-949. Hanson, G. H. “Localization Economies, Vertical Organization and Trade.” American Economic Review, 1996, 86 (5), 1266-1278. Hanson, G. H. “Increasing Returns, Trade and the Regional Structure of Wages.” The Economic Journal, 1997, 107 (440) January, 113-133. Hanson, G. H. “North American Economic Integration and Industry Location.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998, 14 (2), 30-43. Harris, C. “The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1954, 64, 315-348. Harrison, A. “Openness and Growth: A Time Series, Cross Country Analysis for Developing Countries,” Journal of Development Economics, 1996, 48 (2), 419-447. Head, K. and Mayer, T. “The Empirics of Agglomeration and Trade” Manuscript, 2003. Helpman, E. and Krugman, P. R. Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Incresing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985. Henderson, V. J.; Shalizi Z. and Venables, A. “Geography and Development.” Journal of Economic Geography, 2001, 1 (1), 81-105. Hirschman, A., The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1958. Hotelling, H. “Stability in Competition.” Economic Journal, 1929, 39 (153), 41-57. Krueger, A. “Trade policy and economic development: how we learn”, American Economic Review, 1997, 87 (1), 1-22. Krugman, P. R. “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade.” American Economic Review, 1979, 69 (4), 469-79. Krugman, P. R. “Scale Economics, Product Differentiation and the Pattern of Trade.” American Economic Review, 1980, 70 (5), 950-59. Krugman, P. R. “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.” Journal of Political Economy, 1991, 99 (3), 137-150. Krugman, P. R. “What’s New about The New Economic Geography.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998a, 14 (2), 7-17. Krugman, P. R. “Space: The Final Frontier.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998b, 12 (2), 161-174. Krugman, P. R. and Gordon, H. “Mexico-U.S. Free Trade and The Location of Production,” in Garber, P., ed., The Mexico-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993. Krugman, P. R. and Livas Elizondo, R. “Trade Policy and The Third World Metropolis.” Journal of Development Economics, 1996, 49 (1), 137-150. Krugman, P. R. and Venables, A. J. “Globalization and the Inequality of Nations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110 (4), 857-880. Limao, N. and Venables, A. J. “Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade.” The World Bank Economic Review, 2001, 15 (3), 451-479. Lösch, A. The Economics of Location. 1954, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Mansori, K. S. “The Geographic Effects of Trade Liberalization with Increasing Returns in Transportation.” Journal of Regional Science, 2003, 43 (2), 249-268. Marshall, A. Principles of Economics, London. Macmillan ,1920. Mossay, P. “The core periphery model: a note on the existence and uniqueness of short-run equlibrium.” Journal of Urban Economics, 2006, 59 (3), 389-393. Ottaviano, G. I. and Thisse, J. F. “On Economic Geography in Economic Theory: Increasing Returns and Pecuniary Externalities.” Journal of Economic Geography, 1997, 1 (2), 153-179. Ottaviano, G. I. and Puga, D. “Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of the New Economy Geography.” The World Economy, 1998, 21(6) 707-731. Ottaviano, G. I. and Thisse, J. F. “Agglomeration and Economic Geography.” Manuscript, 2003. Ottaviano, G. I. and Thisse, J. F. “New Economic Geography: What about N?” Manuscript, 2004. Overman, H.; Redding, S. and Venables, A. “The Economic Geography of Trade, Production and Income: A Survey of Empirics,” in Kwan, C. and Harrigan, J. eds. , Handbook of International Trade, Blackwell Publishing, 2003. Pred, A. The Spatial Dynamics of US Urban-Industrial Growth, 1800-1914. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1966. Puga, D. “The Rise and Fall of Economic Inequalities.” European Economic Review, 1999, 43 (2), 303-334. Puga, D. and Venables, A. J. “Preferential Trading Arrangements and Industrial Location.” Journal of International Economics, 1997, 43 (3-4), 347-368. Puga, D. and Venables, A. J. “Agglomeration and Economic Development: Import Substitution vs. Trade Liberalisation.” Economic Journal, 1999, 109 (455), 292-311. Quigley, J. M. “Urban Diversity and Economic Growth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, 12 (2), 127-138. Ramirez Grajeda, M. and Sheldon, I. M “Trade Openness and City Interaction.” manuscript, 2009. Samuelson, P. A. “The Transfer Problem and Transport Costs: The Terms of Trade when Impediments are Absent.” Economic Journal, 1954, 62 (254), 278-304. Scitovsky, T. “Two concepts of External Economies.” Journal of Political Economy, 1954, 62 (2), 143-151. Starret, D. “Market Allocations of Location Choice in a Model with Free Mobility,” Journal of Economic Theory, 1978, 17 (1), 21-37. Tirole, J. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988. Venables, A. J. “Economic Integration and the Location of Firms.” American Economic Review, 1995, 85 (2), 296-300. Venables, A. J. “Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries.” International Economic Review, 1996, 37 (2), 341-359. Venables, A. J. “The Assessment: Trade and Location.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998, 14 (2), 1-6. Von Thünen, J. Der IsolierteStaat in Beiziehung au Landschaft und Nationalökonomie. Hamburg, 1826. Weber, A. Theory of Location of Industries. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press, 1909. Wheaton, W. and Shishido, H. “Urban Concentration, Agglomeration Economies, and the Level of Economic Development.” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1981, 30 (1), 17-30. Yanikkaya, H. “Trade Openness and Economic Growth: a cross Country Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Development Economics, 2003, 72 (1), 57-89. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/18076 |