Matei, Lucica and Iancu, Diana Camelia (2009): On the Way to Modernization: The 'Good Enough' Governance Making in Romania.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_18941.pdf Download (224kB) | Preview |
Abstract
‘To be or not to be good governance' has probably been a question of interest to scholars for many centuries now; the issue of how to measure it as to offer alternatives for governmental actions however became of interest only recently. In this respect, this paper explores the concept of 'good enough' governance in the context provided by Robert Dahl's theory on democratization. In doing so, it elaborates the idea according to which good enough governance may be interpreted as a minimal democratic system in need of a minimal democratic administrative practice. The validation of this theoretical tool is to be completed against the Romanian administrative reform as assessed by the national strategic documents and the European Commission Regular and Monitoring Reports of 1998-2006. The larger scope of the paper is to offer a comprehensive image of the 'good enough' governance inside the spectrum of the building of a consolidated democracy
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On the Way to Modernization: The 'Good Enough' Governance Making in Romania |
English Title: | On the Way to Modernization: The 'Good Enough' Governance Making in Romania |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | good enough governance, policy making, European integration |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G18 - Government Policy and Regulation H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H83 - Public Administration ; Public Sector Accounting and Audits |
Item ID: | 18941 |
Depositing User: | Lucica Matei |
Date Deposited: | 01 Dec 2009 07:05 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 06:17 |
References: | Perri, Raab / Charles, Bellamy, Christine. 2005. “Joined-up Government and Privacy in the United Kingdom: Managing Tensions between Data Protection and Social Policy”, Public Administration, Volume 83, no.1, pp.111-133; Balducci, Massimo. 1996. „The European Charter of Local Self- Government and the Principle of Subsidiarity: a new philosophy in the relationship between state and local authorities - Introductory Report”, Council of Europe Publishing House, studies and texts no. 50; Berkley, G., J. Rouse and R. Begovich. 1991. The Craft of Public Administration (5th ed). Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown Publishers; Cassese, S. 2003. “The Age of Administrative Reforms”, in Jack Hayward and Anand Menon, Governing Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.128-138; Cassese, S. 2006. Four features of the European Administrative Space, paper presented at the Connex thematic conference “Towards a European Administrative Space”, Birbeck College, University of London, 16-18 november 2006; Christensen, Tom / Lægreid, Per. 2005. “Trust in Government – The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors and Demography”, Public Performance and Management Review, Volume 28, no.4, pp.487-511; Christensen, Tom / Fimreite, Anne Lise / Lægreid, Per. 2007. “Reform of the employment and welfare administrations – the challenges of co-coordinating diverse public organizations”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Volume 73, no.3, pp.389-408; Christensen, Tom / Lægreid, Per (eds.) 2006a. Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State. London: Edward Elgar; Christensen, Tom / Lægreid, Per (eds.) 2007a. Transcending New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate; Christensen, Tom / Lægreid, Per. 2006b. The Whole-of-government Approach – Regulation, Performance, and Public-sector Reform, paper presented at the Conference “A Performing Public Sector: The Second Transatlantic Dialogue’, Workshop 2 – Performance of Regulation and Regulation of Performance. Leuven, 1–3 June; Christensen, Tom / Laegreid, Per. 2007b. “The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform”, Public Administration Review, November – December, pp. 1059-1066; Cole, Michael / Fenwick, John. 2003. “UK Local Government: The Impact of Modernization on Departmentalism”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Volume 69, pp.259-270; COM 2001 (428): European Commission, White Paper on European Governance; Cope, Stephen / Goodship, Jo. 1999. “Regulating Collaborative Government: Towards Joined-Up Government?”, Public Policy and Administration, Volume 14, no.2, Summer; Dahl, R. A. [1947] 2001. „The Science of Public Administration: Three Problems”, in Camilla Stivers (ed.), Democracy, Bureaucracy, and the study of Administration, Colorado, Oxford: Westview Press, pp. 60-76; Dahl, R. A. [1971] 2000. Poliarhiile [Polyarchies]. Iaşi: Institutul European; Dahl, R. A. [1989] 2002. Democraţia şi criticii ei [Democracy and its Critics]. Iaşi: Institutul European; Dahl, R. A. [1998] 2003. Despre democraţie [On Democracy]. Iaşi: Institutul European; Darlow, Alison / Percy-Smith, Janie / Wells, Peter. 2007. “Community strategies: Are they delivering joined up governance?”, Local Government Studies, Volume 33, no.1, February, pp.117-129; Delcamp, A. 1994. „Introduction” in Alain Delcamp (coord.). Les collectivités décentralisée de l’Union Européenne. Paris: La Documentation Française, pp.7-15; Delcamp, A.1996. “Monitoring the implementation of the European Charter of Local Self-Government in the Member States which have ratified it”. Conference on the occasion of the 10-th anniversary of the European Charter of Local Self-Government proceedings. Council of Europe Publishing House, Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe - studies and texts no. 50; Denhardt, R.B. / Denhardt, J.V. 2000. „The new public service: serving rather than steering”, Public Administration Review, Volume 60, no.6, pp.549 – 559; Denters, B. / Rose, L. 2005. “Local governance in the third millennium: a brave new world?”, in B. Denters and L. Rose (eds.) Comparing Local Governance, Houndmills: Palgrave, pp.1-11; DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) 1998b. Modern Local Government: In Touch with the People, http://www.local.odpm.gov.uk/sponsor/democrac/ (last access: 30.07.2008) 10; DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) 1998a. Modernising Local Government. Local Democracy and Community Leadership Paper, http://www.local.odpm.gov.uk/sponsor/democrac/ (last access: 30.07.2008); Grindle, Merilee. 2007. “Good Enough Governance Revisited”. Development Policy Review, vol. 25 (5), pp. 553-574; Hambleton, Robin. 2000. “Modernising Political Management in Local Government”, Urban Studies, Volume 37, nos.5-6, pp.931-950; Haque, M. S. 1997. “Local Governance in Developing Nations. Reexamining the Question of Accountability”, in Regional Development Dialogue, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. III – XXIII; Heller, P. 2000. “Moving the State: The Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa and Porto Alegre”, in Politics and Society, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 131 – 163; Hood, Christopher. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?”, Public Administration, Volume 69, no.1, pp.3-19; Humpage, Louise. 2005. “Experimenting with a ‘Whole of Government Approach’. Indigenous Capacity Building in New Zealand and Australia”, Policy Studies, Volume 26, no.1, March, pp. 47-66; Iancu, D.C. / Van Ostaaijen, J. 2007. “Centralisation is dead, Long Live centralisation – The Case of Intra-municipal decentralisation in Rotterdam (The Netherlands) and Bucharest (Romania)”, în Franzke, J. et al. (eds.), Tensions between Local Governance and Local Democracy, Rotterdam: Reed Elsevier, pp.271 – 290; Iancu, D.C. 2009. “Exploring change in Romania: To be or not to be Joined-up Government?”, Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences, volume 2, no.1, January, pp.41-75; Iancu, D.C. 2008. Europenizarea administratiei publice locale in Romania [Europeanisation of local public administration in Romania], Ph.D. dissertation, Bucharest: SNSPA; Iancu, Diana – Camelia / Klimovský, Daniel. 2008. Thinking outside the box: local government and the preference-holders’ participation to policy making processes in Slovakia and Romania, paper presented at the 16 Annual NISPAcee Conference, Bratislava, May 2008. th Johnson, Bev. 2005. Strategies for Successful Joined Up Government Initiatives, Fellowship Program supported by John Curtin Institute of Public Policy, Institute of Public Administration of Australia, Department of Premier and Cabinet; Kaboolian, L. 1998. „The New Public Management: challenging the boundaries of the management versus administration debate”, Public Administration Review, Volume 58, no.3, pp. 189-193; Kaufmann, Daniel / Kraay, Aart / Mastruzzi, Massimo. 2005. Governance Matters IV—Governance Indicatorsfor 1996 - 2004, Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pubs/govmatters4.htm; Kettl, D.F. 2000. The Global Public Management Revolution: a Report on the Transformation of Governance. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution; Kettl, Donald. 2006. “Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative”, Public Administration Review, December – special issue, pp. 10-19; Lancaster, Lane W. 1934. “Private Associations and Public Administration”, Social Forces, Volume 13, no.2, December, pp.283-291; Lane, Jan – Erik. 2000. The Public Sector – Concepts, Models, Approaches (3rd edition). London: SAGE Publications. Levitan, D. [1943] 2001. „Political Ends and Administrative Means”, in Camilla Stivers (ed.), Democracy, Bureaucracy, and the study of Administration, Colorado, Oxford: Westview Press, pp.4-13; March, James G. / Olson, Johan P. Olsen, Johan P. 1983. “Organising Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about Government”, The American Political Science Review, Volume 77, no.2, pp.281-296; Marcou, G. 1999. „L’autonomie des collectivités locales en Europe: fondements, formes et limites” in Les Entretiens de la Caisse des dépôts sur le développement local. Quel avenir pour l’autonomie des collectivités locales? Paris: Editions de l’Aube / SECPB, pp. 31 – 85; Matei, A. 2000. Introducere în analiza sistemelor administraţiei publice [Introduction to the analysis of public administration systems]. Bucureşti: Economica; Matei, A. / Matei, L. 2008. "Globalization and Europeanization. A Projection on a European Model of Public Administration," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 4(4(521)), pages 33-52, April; Matei, L. / Iancu, Diana-Camelia. 2007. "Theoretical Delimitations: The Europeanization Of Public Administration And Its Institutional Levers", Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 6(6(511)(su), pages 93-110, June; Matei, L. 2006. "Public Sector and Europeanization Challenges", Theoretical 11 and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 2(2(497)), pages 27-34, April; Osborne, David / Gaebler, Ted. 1992. Reinventing Government. New York, NY: Penguin Press; O'Toole, Barry J. 2000. “Vision and Values: the Government's mission to modernize”, Public Policy and Administration, Volume 15, no.1, Spring, pp.84-94; Parsons, Wayne. 2002. “From Muddling Through to Muddling Up – Evidence Based Policy Making and the Modernisation of British Government”, Public Policy and Administration, Volume 17, no.3, Autumn, pp.43-60; Peters, B. Guy. / Pierre, Jon. 1998. „Governance without Government? Rethinking Public Administration”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Volume 8, no. 2, pp.223-243; Peters, B. Guy. 1998 . “Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Coordination”, Public Administration, Volume 76, summer, pp. 295-311; Pollitt, Christopher. 1993. Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience (2nd edition), Oxford: Blackwell; Pollitt, Christopher. 1995. “Justification by Works or by Faith?”, Evaluation, Volume 1, no.2, pp 133–54; Pollitt, Christopher. 2003. “Joined-up Government: a Survey”, Political Studies Review, Volume 1, pp.34-49; Pollitt, Christopher. Bouckaert, Geert. 2000. Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; PUMA (Public Management Service. 1995. Government in transition: public management reform in OECD countries. Paris: OECD; Radaelli, C.M. 2005. „Diffusion without convergence: how political context shapes the adoption of regulstory impact assessment”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol.12, Routledge, pp.924-943; Rhodes, R.A.W. 1996. “The New Governance: Governing without Government”, Political Studies, XLIV, pp.652-667; Richards, David / Kavanagh, Dennis. 2000. Can Joined-Up Government be a Reality? A Case Study of the British Labour Government 1997-2000, paper presented at the Australian Political Studies Association Conference, the Australian National University, Canberra 4-6 October; Rittel, H. / Webber, M. 1973. “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning”, Policy Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 155-69; Rose, R. et al. [1998] 2003. Democraţia şi alternativele ei [Democracy and its critics]. Iaşi: Institutul European; Rosenau, J. N. 1992. “Governance, Order and Change in World Politics”, in J. Rosenau and E.O. Czempiel (coord.), Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-29; Rosenbloom, D. H. 1989. Public Administration. Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector (2nd ed.). New York: Random House; Sedelmeier, U. 2006. „Europeanisation in new member and candidate states”, Living Reviews in European Governance, vol.1, nr.3, http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2006-3 (last access: 06.08.2007); Shukra, Kalbir / Back, Les / Khan, Azra / Keith, Michael / Solomos, John. 2004. “Black politics and the web of joined-up governance: compromise, ethnic minority mobilization and the transitional public sphere”, Social Movement Studies, Volume 3, No.1, April, pp.31-50; SIGMA. 1998. Preparing Public Administration for the European Administrative Space. SIGMA paper no. 23, CCNM/SIGMA/PUMA (98) 39, Paris: OCDE; SIGMA. 1998. Preparing Public Administration for the European Administrative Space. SIGMA paper no. 23, CCNM/SIGMA/PUMA (98) 39, Paris: OCDE; SIGMA. 1999. European Principles for Public Administration. SIGMA paper no. 27, CCNM/SIGMA/PUMA (99) 44/REV1, Paris: OCDE; SIGMA. 1999. European Principles for Public Administration. SIGMA paper no. 27, CCNM/SIGMA/PUMA (99) 44/REV1, Paris: OCDE; Signoretta, Paola / Craglia, Massimo. 2002. “'Joined-up Government in Practice: A Case Study of Children's Needs in Sheffield”, Local Government Studies, Volume 28, no.1, January, pp.59-76; SSA (State Government of Victoria State Services Authority). 2007. “Joined up Government. A Review of National and International Experiences”, Occasional Papers no.1, Melbourne, Australia; Stone Sweet, Alec / Sandholtz, Wayne / Fligstein, Neil. 2001. The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Sullivan, Helen. 2005. “Is Enabling Enough? Tensions and Dilemmas in New Labour's Strategies for Joining-up Local Governance”, Public Policy and Administration, Volume 20, no.4, Winter, pp.10-23; Vachudova, M.A. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Verheijen, A.J.G. 2000. Administrative capacity development. A Race against time, Working Document, Haga: Scientific Council for Government Policy; World Bank. 2002. Reforming Public Institutions and Strengthening Governance. A World Bank Strategy – November 2000. Washington: World Bank; Ziller, J. 2000. „De la nature de l’administration européenne”, Revue Française d’Administration Publique, no. 95, pp. 357-367; Ziller, J. 2003. „Vrais et faux changements dans les administrations en Europe”, Revue Française d’Administration Publique, no. 105/106, pp.67-79; Ziller, J. 2004. „L’autorité administrative dans l’Union Européene”, EUI Working Paper Law, no.2004/14, European University Institute, Florence. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/18941 |