James, Simon (2007): Tax Simplification is not a simple issue: the reasons for difficulty and a possible strategy. Published in: University of Exeter Discussion Papers in Management , Vol. 18, No. 07 : pp. 1-18.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_19281.pdf Download (219kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Simplicity is an important attribute for a tax system and there have been many attempts at simplification in different countries including, of course, Australia. However these attempts have not been very successful. The main reason is that there are, of course, important factors that cause tax systems to be complex and not all of them are bad. Another important matter is that it is not always clear what is meant by tax simplification. A further difficulty has been that attempts at simplification have often been made on an ad hoc basis and, once the enthusiasm has exhausted itself, the trend towards greater complexity continues. It is therefore suggested that what is needed is a strategy for simplification. This should involve establishing the relative importance of simplification compared to other aspects of the tax system. Progress towards simplification should then be monitored and evaluated on a permanent basis. To ensure a balance between tax simplification and other goals it is proposed that a body be established to monitor on a permanent basis the tax system, the environment in which it operates and proposed tax reforms.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Tax Simplification is not a simple issue: the reasons for difficulty and a possible strategy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Tax simplification; tax administration |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H20 - General H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H29 - Other |
Item ID: | 19281 |
Depositing User: | Simon James |
Date Deposited: | 14 Dec 2009 02:18 |
Last Modified: | 10 Oct 2019 06:21 |
References: | Avery Jones, J. (1969), ‘Tax law: rules or principles?’ Fiscal Studies, Vol. 17(3), 63-89. Bentham, Jeremy (1823), Truth v. Ashurst; or Law as it is, (though written in 1792). Clark, Ross (2006), How to Label a Goat: The Silly Rules and Regulations that are Strangling Britain, Harriman House, Ltd, Petersfield, Hampshire. Cooper, G.S. (1993), ‘Themes and issues in tax simplification’, Australian Tax Forum, Vol. 10, 417-60. Cullis, J., Jones, P. and Morrissey, O. (1993), ‘Evaluating the poll tax as a tax reform’, Local Government Studies, Vol. 19. Farnsworth, A. (1951), Addington, Author of the Modern Income Tax, Stevens. Gibson, J. (1990), The Politics and Economics of the Poll Tax, Mrs Thatcher’s Downfall, EMAS. Gowers, Sir Ernest (1954), The Complete Plain Words, London, HMSO. Highfield, R. (2006), ‘Pre-populated Income Tax Returns’, 7th International Tax Administration Conference, ATAX, Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales. Hite, P.A. (1989) ‘A positive approach to taxpayer compliance,’ Public Finance, Vol. 44, 249-266. Holz-Eakin, D., (1995), ‘Should small businesses be tax-favoured?’ National Tax Journal Vol. XLVIII, No. 3, 387-395. Howe, Geoffrey (1998), ‘Tax law simplification in the United Kingdom’ in C. Sandford ed., Further Key Issues in Tax Reform. Inland Revenue (1995) The Path to Tax Simplification: A Background Paper, London, HMSO. Johnson, Sir Alexander (1965), The Inland Revenue, Allen & Unwin, London. James, S. (1999), ‘The future international tax environment and European tax harmonisation: a personal view,’ European Accounting Review, Vol. 8(4), 731-747. James, S. (2005), ‘Tax Compliance Strategies to Tackle the Underground Economy’ in Chris Bajada and Freidrich Schneider (eds.) The Size Cause and Consequences of the Underground Economy: An International Perspective, Ashgate, 275-289. James, Simon and Edwards, Alison (2007), A Strategic Approach to Personal Tax Reform, paper presented at the Personal Income Tax Symposium, Australian School of Taxation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, April 2007. James, S., Lewis, A, and Allison F. (1987), The Comprehensibility of Taxation: A Study of Taxation and Communications, Avebury, Aldershot. James‚ Simon and Wallschutzky, Ian (1994), 'Should Australia adopt a cumulative withholding tax system?' Australian Tax Forum, Vol. 11(3), 311-335. Krever, Richard (2003), ‘Taming complexity in Australian income tax’, Sydney Law Review, Vol. 25, 467-505. Lehmann, G. (1995), ‘The reform that does not reform and the simplification that does not simplify - The Tax Law Improvement Project Fiasco’, Butterworth’s Weekly Tax Bulletin, no. 33, 530-33. Mair, D. and Damania, R. (1992), ‘Fiscal crisis and local government reform’, Local Government Studies, Vol. 18. Mintzberg, H. (2004), Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development, San Fransisco: Berret-Koehler, Publishers. Pitt William (the Younger) (1798), Speech, House of Commons, 3 December. Plain English Campaign (2005) http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/bull05.htm#aus. Accessed 23 October 2006. Prebble, J. (1994), ‘Why is the tax law incomprehensible?’ British Tax Review, 1994, 380-93. Smith, P. (1991), ‘Lessons from the British poll tax disaster’, National Tax Journal, 1991, Vol. 44. Surrey, S.S. (1969), ‘Complexity and the Internal Revenue Code: The Problem of Management of Tax Detail, Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 34, 673. Surrey, S.S. (1973), Pathways to Tax Reform, Harvard University Press. Tax Law Review Committee (1996), Final Report on Tax Legislation, London, Institute for Fiscal Studies. Tax Law Review Team (1994), The Broad Framework, Canberra, Australian Tax Office. Taylor, C. John (2006), Beyond 4100: A report on measures to combat rising compliance costs through reducing tax law complexity, Sydney, Taxation Institute of Australia. Trevelyan, G.M. (1946), English Social History, 2nd ed. 1946, Longmans, Green and Co. Vickrey, William (1969), ‘Tax simplification through cumulative averaging’, Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 34(4), 736-750. Wallschutzky, I. G. (1995), ‘TLIP: Stage 1 – Benchmarking’, Australian Tax Forum, Vol. 12, 115-55. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/19281 |