Social expenditure and poverty reduction in the EU15 and other OECD countries

Caminada, Koen and Goudswaard, Kees (2009): Social expenditure and poverty reduction in the EU15 and other OECD countries. Published in: Department of Economics Research Memorandum No. 2009.02 (2009): pp. 1-33.

Abstract

The European Union coordinates and encourages Member State actions to combat poverty, and to reform their social protection systems on the basis of policy exchanges and mutual learning (‘best practices’). Some EU countries are more effective in poverty reduction than others. What can explain these variations in effectiveness? This paper analyzes the effectiveness of social transfers in alleviating poverty. We focus on EU15 countries, but also include other OECD countries in our analysis. We compare poverty rates at the levels of market and disposable incomes, that is before and after transfers, in order to analyze the effect of tax and transfer policies in reducing poverty, i.e. to determine the target efficiency of social transfers. We perform several tests with the most recent data (LIS, OECD, SOCX, and Eurostat: ECHP/EU-SILC). Finally, we perform several partial analyses by disaggregating poverty rates to socioeconomic and demographic conditions in order to investigate to what extent variations at the social program level (such as old age pensions, child benefits) affect the measured effectiveness of the welfare state in alleviating poverty. Empirical results draw heavily on how pensions are treated - as primary income or as transfer. We find a strong relationship between levels of social spending and antipoverty effects of social transfers and taxes across EU15 countries. Social spending seems to be an important determinant of a country’s poverty outcome, especially among the elderly, when pensions are considered as transfers. Our analysis highlights some cross-country differences in targeting of social expenditures on poverty alleviation in EU15 and non-EU15 countries around 2005. We introduce an indicator of Public Policy Effectiveness on Poverty Alleviation across countries. Each percentage point of social expenditure alleviates poverty in both EU15 and non-EU15 countries by .7 percentage points on average. Relatively high scores in EU15 countries are found for Ireland and Scandinavian countries, while Italy, Greece and Spain score lowest. Outside Europe the poorest scores are reported for Korea and the USA. Country ranking appears to be rather stable over time when outcomes for 1995 and 2005 are compared, although some of our results may be sensitive to cyclical factors. Finally, we analyzed poverty among vulnerable age groups. Our results show that family programs and child support alleviate poverty among children to a large extent, especially in non-EU15 countries. For public and private old age pension and survivors schemes we find no effect on poverty in case pensions are considered as transfers (both in EU15 and non-EU15 countries). However, this picture changes completely when pensions are counted as transfers. In that case the poverty rate among elderly in EU15 falls from 90 to 21 percent through taxes and social transfers!

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: poverty, welfare states, Lisbon objectives, social indicators
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

References

Adema, W. (2001), ‘Net Social Expenditure: 2nd edition’, Labour Market and Social Policy - Occasional Papers, No. 52, Paris: OECD.

Adema, W., and M. Ladaique (2005), ‘Net Social Expenditure, 2005 edition’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper 29, Paris: OECD.

Atkinson, A.B. (1987), ‘On the measurement of poverty’, Econometrica 55 (4), pp. 749-764.

Atkinson, T. (2002), ‘Social Inclusion and the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4), pp. 625-643.

Atkinson, A.B. (2003), ‘Income Inequality in OECD Countries: Data and Explanations’, CESifo Economic Studies 49(4), pp. 479-513.

Atkinson, A.B., L. Rainwater and T.M. Smeeding (1995), ‘Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study’, OECD Social Policy Studies 18, Paris.

Atkinson, A.B., and A. Brandolini (2001), ‘Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of Secondary Data-Sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study’, Journal of Economic Literature 39 (3) (September), pp. 771-800.

Atkinson, T., B. Cantillon, E. Marlier and B. Nolan (2002), Social Indicators. The EU and Social Inclusion, Oxford: University Press.

Beblavy, M. (2009), ‘Comparative analysis of determinants and effects of social protection spending in the new EU member states’, paper presented at FISS Conference, June 16th-18th, Sigtuna, Sweden.

Behrendt, Ch. (2000), ‘Is there income poverty in Western Europe? Methodological pitfalls in the measurement of poverty in a comparative perspective’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 258, Luxembourg.

Behrendt, Ch. (2002), ‘Holes in the safety net? Social security and the alleviation of poverty in a comparative perspective’, in: R. Sigg and Chr. Behrendt (eds.) Social Security in the Global Village, International Social Security Series, Volume 8, New Brunswick / London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 333-358.

Bourguignon, F., and L. Pereira da Silva and N. Stern (2002), ‘Evaluating the Poverty Impact of Economic Policies: Some Analytical Challenges’, Stern - Washington DC: The World Bank (Mimeo), 2002.

Brandolini, A. (2006), ‘Measurement of income distribution in supranational entities: The case of the European Union’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 452, Luxembourg.

Brandolini, A., and T.M. Smeeding (2007), ‘Inequality Patterns in Western-Type Democracies: Cross-Country Differences and Time Changes’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 458, Luxembourg

Brandolini, A., and T.M. Smeeding (2008), ‘Inequality: International Evidence’, in: S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1013-1021.

Caminada, K. and K.P. Goudswaard (2001), ‘International Trends in Income Inequality and Social Policy’, International Tax and Public Finance 8 (4), pp. 395-415.

Caminada, K. and K.P. Goudswaard (2005), ‘Are Public and Private Social Expenditures Complementary?’, International Advances in Economic Research 11 (2), pp. 175-189.

Caminada, K. and K.P. Goudswaard, K.P. (2010), ‘Social income transfers and poverty alleviation in the EU15 and other OECD countries. An empirical analysis’, Research Memorandum Department of Economics, Leiden University, (forthcoming).

Cantillon, B. (2009), ‘Poverty and social security: the paradox of the social investment state in the rich egalitarian EU member states’, paper presented at FISS Conference, June 16th-18th, Sigtuna, Sweden.

Cantillon, B., N. Van Mechelen and B. Schulte (2008), ‘Minimum income policies in old and new member states’, in: J. Alber, T. Fahey and C. Saraceno (eds.), Handbook of Quality of Life in the Enlarged European Union, London: Routledge, pp. 218-234.

Danziger, S., R. Haveman and R. Plotnick (1981), ‘How Income Transfer Programs Affect Work, Savings and Income Distribution: A Critical Assessment’, Journal of Economic Literature 19 (September), pp. 975-1028.

European Commission (2007), Joint Report on Social protection and social inclusion 2007. Social inclusion, pensions, healthcare and long term care, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

European Commission (2008), Joint Report on Social protection and social inclusion 2008. Social inclusion, pensions, healthcare and long term care, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

European Commission (2009), Joint Report on Social protection and social inclusion 2009, Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.

European Commission – Eurostat (2008), The Social Situation in the European Union 2007. Social Cohesion through Equal Opportunities, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Eurostat (2005), ‘The continuity of indicators during the transition between ECHP and EU-SILC’, Working Paper and Studies, Eurostat.

Eurostat (2009), Structural Indicators EU - Social Cohesion (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/).

Esping-Andersen, G., and J. Myles (2009), ‘Economic Inequality and the Welfare State’, in: W. Salverda, B. Nolan and T.M. Smeeding (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, Oxford: University Press, pp. 639-664.

Förster, M. (1993), ‘Comparing Poverty in 13 OECD Countries: Traditional and Synthetic Approaches’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper 100, Luxembourg.

Förster, M., and M. Pearson (2002), ‘Income distribution and poverty in the OECD area: trends and driving forces’, OECD Economic Studies, No. 34, 2002/1, Paris: OECD, pp. 7-39.

Förster, M., and M. Mira d’Ercole (2005), ‘Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 22.

Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding (1997), ‘Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality’, Journal of Economic Literature 35 (June), pp. 633-687.

Gottschalk, P. and T.M. Smeeding (2000), ‘Empirical Evidence on Income Inequality in Industrialized Countries’, in: A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourgignon (eds), Handbook of Income Distribution, New York: Elsevier-North Holland Publishers, pp. 261-308.

Guio, A.-C. (2005), ‘Income poverty and social exclusion in the EU25’, Statistics in focus: population and social conditions, 13/2005, pp. 1-7.

Hagenaars, A., and K. de Vos (1987), ‘The definition and measurement of poverty’, The Journal of Human Resources 23 (2), pp. 211-221.

Haveman, R. (2008), ‘What Does It Mean to Be Poor in a Rich Society?’, Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper 1356-08, Madison.

Kakwani, N., and J. Silber (eds.) (2007), The Many Dimensions of Poverty, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kakwani, N., and J. Silber (eds.) (2008), Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kenworthy, L. (1999), ‘Do Social Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment’, Social Forces 77 (3), pp. 1119-1139.

Kim, H. (2000a), ‘Anti-Poverty Effectiveness of Taxes and Income Transfers in Welfare States’, International Social Security Review 53 (4) , pp. 105–129.

Kim, H. (2000b), ‘Do welfare states reduce poverty? A critical shortcoming in the standard analysis of the anti-poverty effect of welfare states’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 233, Luxembourg.

Kühner, S. (2007), ‘Country-Level Comparisons of Welfare State Change Measures: Another Facet of the Dependent Variable Problem within the Comparative Analysis of the Welfare State?’, Journal of European Social Policy 17 (1), pp. 5-18.

Leibfried, S. (2002), ‘Some Background Comments on the Extension of the Open Method of Co-ordination’, Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Sociale Zekerheid 44 (3), pp. 473-479.

Lefèbvre, M. (2007), ‘The Redistributive Effects of Pension Systems in Europe: A Survey of Evidence’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 457, Luxembourg.

Lelkes, O., and E. Zólyomi (2008), ‘Poverty Across Europe: The Latest Evidence Using the EU-SILC Survey’, European Centre Policy Brief, October 2008, pp. 1-15.

Luxembourg Income Study (2009), LIS Key Figures on Poverty, Luxembourg (www.lisproject.org).

Mahler, V.A., and D.K. Jesuit (2006), ‘Fiscal Redistribution in the Developed Countries: New Insights from the Luxembourg Income Study’, Socio-Economic Review 4, pp. 483-511 (an extended version is published as Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 392, Luxembourg).

Marcus, J. and S. Danziger (2000), ‘Income Poverty in Advanced Countries’, in: A.B. Atkinson, and Bourguignon, F. (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, New York: Elsevier-North Holland Publishers.

Musgrave, R.A., K.E. Case and H.B. Leonard, (1974), ‘The Distribution of Fiscal Burdens and Benefits’, Public Finance Quarterly 2 (July), pp. 259-311.

Notten, G., and C. de Neuborg (2007), ‘Relative or absolute poverty in the US and EU? The battle of the rates’, MPRA Working Paper 5313, Munich.

Nell, G. (2005), ‘Prosperity and the welfare state: The effect of benefit generosity and wage coordination on absolute poverty and prosperity in cross-national perspective’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 424, Luxembourg.

OECD (2008), Growing unequal? Income distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.

Ringen, S. (1987), The Possibility of Politics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sainsbury, D., and A. Morissens (2002), ‘European anti-poverty policies in the 1990s: Toward a common safety net’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 307, Luxembourg.

Scholz, J.K., R. Moffitt, and B. Cowan (2008), ‘Trends in Income Support’, Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper 1350-08, Madison.

Smeeding, T. (2005), ‘Poor people in rich nations: The United States in comparative perspective’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 419, Luxembourg.

Smeeding, T., L. Rainwater, and G. Burtless (2000), ‘United States Poverty in a Cross-National Context’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 244, Luxembourg.

Smolensky, E., W. Hoyt and S. Danziger (1987), ‘A Critical Survey of Efforts to Measure Budget Incidence’, in: H.M. van de Kar; B.L. Wolfe (eds.), The Relevance of Public Finance for Policy-Making, Proceedings IIFP Congress 1985, Detroit, pp. 165-179.

SOCX OECD (2008), Social Expenditure Database 1980-2005 (www.oecd.org/els/social/expenditure).

Thorbecke, E. (2007), ‘Multidimensional Poverty: Conceptual and Measurement Issues’ in: N. Kakwani and J. Silber (eds.), The Many Dimensions of Poverty, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3-19.

Wu, K. (2005), ‘How Social Security Keeps Older Persons Out of Poverty across Developed Countries’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper 410, Luxembourg.