Erdlenbruch, Katrin and Thoyer, Sophie and Grelot, Frédéric and Kast, Robert and Enjolras, Geoffroy (2009): Risk-sharing policies in the context of the French Flood Prevention Action Programmes. Published in: Journal of Environmental Management , Vol. 91, No. 2 (November 2009): pp. 363-369.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_20187.pdf Download (77kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article analyzes the consequences for risk distribution of the French Flood Prevention Action Programme (PAPI). By redirecting floods from the most vulnerable to the least vulnerable areas, PAPIs expose farmers to greater flood risks. This has led local water management institutions to introduce compensation payments. The article outlines the results of an exhaustive survey of all PAPI programmes in France, which examined the way the compensation policies are set up locally. Results of the survey showed that the proposed policies may be financially non-viable. Several more viable risk-sharing solutions are then discussed, involving insurance schemes, state intervention and local institutions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Risk-sharing policies in the context of the French Flood Prevention Action Programmes |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | flood risk management; flood storage; washland creation; risk transfer; compensation payments; insurance; floodplain restoration; over-flooding; damage assessment. |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming |
Item ID: | 20187 |
Depositing User: | Katrin Erdlenbruch |
Date Deposited: | 03 Feb 2010 00:26 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 08:54 |
References: | Barbusiaux, C., 2000. L’assurance récolte et la protection contre les risques climatiques en agriculture. MINEFI, MAP, octobre. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks, 8p. Dunderdale, J.A.L., Morris, J., 1997. The benefit and cost analysis of river maintenance. Journal of the Institute of Water and Environmental Management 11 (6), 423–430. Erdlenbruch, K., Gilbert, E., Grelot, F. and C. Lescoulier, 2008. Une analyse coût-bénéfice spatialisée de la protection contre les inondations – application de la méthode des dommages évités à la basse vallée de l’Orb, Ingénieries E.A.T 53, 3–20. Evers, M., 2008. European strategies for sustainable floodplain management to reduce flood risk. Communication at the World Water Congress 2008, Montpellier, 12 p. Grelot, F., 2004. Gestion collective des inondations – Peut-on tenir compte de l'avis de la population dans la phase d'évaluation économique a priori ? Thèse de l'Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, Paris, 383p. Hansson, K., Danielson, M. and L. Ekenberg, 2008. A framework for evaluation of flood management strategies. Journal of Environmental Management 86, 465–480. Hanley, N. and C. Spash, 2003. Cost-benefit analysis and the environment, Edward Elgar, Northampton, 278p. Johnson, C. Penning-Rowsell, E., Parker, D., 2007. Natural and imposed injustices: the challenges in implementing ‘fair’ flood risk management policy in England, The Geographical Journal 173 (4), 374–390. Kast, R. and A. Lapied, 2006. Economics and Finance of Risks and of the Future, Wiley-Finance, 220p. Kenyon, W., Hill, G., Shannon, P., 2008. Scoping the role of agriculture in sustainable flood management. Land Use Policy 25, 351–360. MEEDDAT, French Ministry of Sustainable Development, http://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/Inondations MEEDDAT, 2007. Expertise des pratiques de compensation en cas de transfert d’exposition aux inondations. Brémond, P., Breton, C., Chastan, B., Enjolras, G., Erdlenbruch, K., Grelot, F., Kast, R., Poulard, C., Thoyer, S. ed.: MEEDDAT. Ménard, C., 2004. Gestion des risques climatiques en agriculture. Engager une nouvelle dynamique. Assemblée nationale, January. Messner, F. and E. Penning-Roswell, 2006. Guidelines for socio-economic flood damage evaluation. FLOODsite. European Community. Morris, J., Hess, T.M., 1987. Agricultural flood alleviation benefit assessment: a case study. Journal of Agricultural Economics 38 (2), 402–412. Morris, J., Bailey, A.P., Lawson, C.S., Leeds-Harrison, P.B., Alsop, D. and Vivash, R., 2008. The economic dimensions of integrating flood management and agrienvironment through washland creation: A case from Somerset, England. Journal of Environmental Management 88, 372– 381. Mortemusque, D., 2007. Une nouvelle étape pour la diffusion de l’assurance récolte, Sénat, February. Moss, T. and J. Monstadt, 2008. Restoring Floodplains in Europe. Policy Contexts and Project Experiences, IWA Publishing, 355p. Munich Re (2005) Topics Geo – Annual Review: Natural Catastrophes 2004, Munich Re, Munich. 15 OECD Studies in Risk Management – France: Policies for Preventing and Compensation Flood- Related Damage, OECD 2006. Penning-Rowsell, E., Johnson, C., Tunstall, S., Tapsell, S., Morris, J., Chatterton, J., Coker, A., Green, C., 2003. The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Defence, Techniques and Data 2002. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University. Pottier, N., Penning-Roswell, E., S. Tunstall and G. Hubert, 2005. Land use and flood protection: contrasting approaches and outcomes in France and in England and Wales, Applied Geography 25, 1–25. Posthumus, H., Hewett, C.J.M., Morris, J., Quinn, P.F., 2008. Agricultural land use and flood risk management: Engaging with stakeholders in North Yorkshire, Agricultural Water Management, 95 (7), 787–798. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/20187 |