The Contributions of Two Eminent Japanese Scholars on the Development of Economic Theories: Michio Morishima and Takashi Negishi

Kurz, Heinz D. (2010): The Contributions of Two Eminent Japanese Scholars on the Development of Economic Theories: Michio Morishima and Takashi Negishi.

Abstract

There can be no doubt that Michio Morishima and Takashi Negishi are two of the most important historians of economic thought of the recent past. Both authors contributed numerous papers and books to the subject, dealing with the works of major economists from the very inception of systematic economic thought at the time of the classical economists up until modern times. And both authors combined a vivid interest in modern economic theory with an interest in what past masters had to say.

The paper assesses and compares the motivations of the two authors to engage in the history of economic theories, their similar, but different approaches to do historical research, and their achievements in this regard. Given the remarkable amount of work each one of them accomplished, the paper has to focus attention on a subset of the themes the two authors dealt with. The emphasis will be on (i) their treatment of the classical theories of value, distribution and capital accumulation, especially those of Adam Smith and David Ricardo, (ii) their discussion of the contributions of Karl Marx and some Marxists, (iii) their interpretation of some early and mature marginalist economists, especially Léon Walras, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk and Knut Wicksell, and (iv) their views about the achievements of John Maynard Keynes. Given the intrinsic complexity of each of these themes, it goes without saying that the paper is bound to proceed largely in terms of synthetic statements.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Negishi, Takashi; Morishima, Michio; general equilibrium; Marxist economics; trade; growth
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B16 - Quantitative and Mathematical

References

Arrow, K.J. and Debreu, G. 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy, Econometrica, 22, pp. 265-290.

Arrow, K.J. and Hahn, F.H. 1971. General Competitive Analysis, San Francisco: Holden-Day.

Gehrke, C. and Kurz, H.D. 2006. Sraffa on von Bortkiewicz: Reconstructing the Classical theory of value and distribution, History of Political Economy, 2006, 38:1, pp. 91-149.

Hahn, F. 1982. The Neo-Ricardians, Cambridge Journal of Economic, 6, pp. 353-74.

Hicks, J.R. 1967. Critical Essays in Monetary Theory, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

Kaldor, N. 1955-56. Alternative theories of distribution, Review of Economic Studies, 23, pp. 83-100.

Kalmbach, P. and Kurz, H.D. 2008. Malthus: Vorgänger von Keynes? In H. Hagemann, G. Horn und H.-J. Krupp (eds), Aus gesamtwirtschaftlicher Sicht. Festschrift in honour of Jürgen Kromphardt, Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 163-82.

Kurz, H.D. 2000. Wicksell and the problem of the ‘Missing Equation’, History of Political Economy, 2000, 32, pp. 765-88.

Kurz, H.D. 2006. Whither the history of economic thought?, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 12:3, pp. 493-523.

Kurz, H.D. 2008. Innovations and profits. Schumpeter and the classical heritage, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67, pp. 263-78.

Kurz, H.D. and Salvadori, N. 1992. Morishima on Ricardo: A review article, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16, pp. 227-47.

Kurz, H.D. and Salvadori, N. 1993. Von Neumann’s growth model and the ‘Classical’ tradition, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1:1, pp. 129-60.

Kurz, H.D. and Salvadori, N. 1995. Theory of Production. A Long-Period Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kurz, H.D. and Salvadori, N. 2002. One theory or two? Walras’s critique of Ricardo. History of Political Economy, 2002, 34, pp. 365-98.

Lucas, R. E. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp. 3-42.

Morishima, M. 1964. Equilibrium, Stability and Growth. A Multi-sectoral Analysis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Morishima, M. 1969. Theory of Economic Growth, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Morishima, M. 1973. Marx’s Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morishima, M. 1977. Walras’s Economics. A Pure Theory of Capital and Money, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morishima, M. 1989. Ricardo’s Economics. A General Equilibrium Theory of Distribution and Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morishima, M. 1992. Capital and Credit. A New Formulation of General Equilibrium Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morishima, M. and Catephores, G. 1978. Value, Exploitation and Growth, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

Negishi, T. 1960. Welfare Economics and the Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy, Metroeconomica, 12: 92-7.

Negishi, T. 1979. Microeconomic Foundation of Keynesian Macroeconomics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Negishi, T. 1980a. Marx and Böhm-Bawerk in the theory of interest, Économie et Sociétés, 14, pp. 287-304.

Negishi, T. 1980b. A Review of Michio Morishima, ‘Walras’s Economics’, Economic Review, 31(1), pp. 89-91.

Negishi, T. 1982a. Wicksell's missing equation: A comment, History of Political Economy 14, pp. 310-11.

Negishi, T. 1982b. Wicksell’s missing equation and Böhm-Bawerk's three causes of interest in a stationary state, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 42, pp. 161-74.

Negishi, T. 1982c. The labor theory of value in the Ricardian theory of international trade, History of Political Economy, 14:2, pp. 199-209.

Negishi, T. 1985. Economic Theories in a Non-Walrasian Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Negishi, T. 1988. The role of demand in Adam Smith's theory of natural price, Seoul Journal of Economics, 1:4, pp. 357-65.

Negishi, T. 1989. History of Economic Theory, Amsterdam: North Holland.

Negishi, T. 1990. Ricardo and Morishima on machinery, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 12:2, pp. 146-61.

Negishi, T. 1991. Samuelson, Saigal and Emmanuel’s theory of international unequal exchange, in Shri Bhagwan Dahiya (ed.), Theoretical Foundations of Development Planning, 4, pp. 37-49.

Negishi, T. 1992. Comment. Minisymposium on ‘The History of Economics and the History of Science’, History of Political Economy, 24:1, 227-9.

Negishi, T. 1993a. International exploitation in Marxist and neo-Marxist economics, in H. Herberg and Ngo Van Long (eds), Trade, Welfare, and Economic Policies: Essays in Honor of Murray C. Kemp, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 353-64.

Negishi, T. 1993b. General equilibrium theory and the history of economics, in A. Heertje (ed.), The Makers of Modern Economics, Vol. I, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 47-66.

Negishi, T. 1993c. A Smithian-growth model and Malthus's optimum propensity to save, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1:1, pp. 115-27.

Negishi, T. 1993d. The Collected Essays of Takashi Negishi, Volume I: General Equilibrium Theory, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

Negishi, T. 1994. The Collected Essays of Takashi Negishi, Volume II: The History of Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

Negishi, T. 1995. Comment, History of Political Economy, 27:1, pp. 183-88.

Negishi, T. 1996a. Different interpretations of Ricardo’s theory of foreign trade, Surugadai Economic Studies, 5:2, pp. 227-38.

Negishi, T. 1996b. Japanese studies of Ricardo’s theory of foreign trade’, Japanese Economic Review, 47:4, pp. 335-45.

Negishi, T. 1998a. Machinery, in H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori (eds), The Elgar Companion to Classical Economists, Vol. II, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 62-5.

Negishi, T. 1998b. Marx, economies of scale, and the falling rate of profit, Japan and the World Economy, 10, pp. 253-63.

Negishi, T. 1999a. Unequal exchange and exploitation, Japanese Economic Review, 50:2, pp. 113-21.

Negishi, T. 1999b. Technology and profit under global monopolistic competition, in R. Sato, R.V. Ramachandran and K. Mino (eds), Global Competition and Integration, Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 229-40.

Negishi, T. 2000. The Collected Essays of Takashi Negishi, Volume III: Economic Thought from Smith to Keynes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Neumann, J. v. 1945. A model of general economic equilibrium, Review of Economic Studies, 13, pp. 1-9.

Pasinetti, L.L. 1960. A mathematical formulation of the Ricardian system, Review of Economic Studies, 27, pp. 78-98.

Pasinetti, L.L. 1962. Rate of profit and income distribution in relation to the rate of economic growth, Review of Economic Studies, 29, pp. 267-79.

Ricardo, D. 1951-1973. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by Piero Sraffa with the collaboration of M.H. Dobb, 11 vols, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Robinson, J.V. 1953. The production function and the theory of capital, Review of Economic Studies, 21, pp. 81-106.

Robinson, J.V. 1970. Review of C.E. Ferguson, ‘The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution’, Economic Journal, 80.

Sandelin, B. 1980. Wicksell’s missing equation, the production function, and the Wicksell effect, History of Political Economy, 12, pp. 29-40.

Sraffa, P. (1951). Introduction, in Ricardo (1951-1973), Works, Vol. I, pp. xiii-lxii.

Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Steedman, I. 1975. Positive profits with negative surplus value, Economic Journal, 85, pp. 114-23.

Walras, L. 1954. Elements of Pure Economics, London: Allen and Unwin.

Wicksell, K. 1934. Lectures on Political Economy, vol. I, translation from the Swedish of the third edn (first edn 1901), London: George Routledge & Sons.