Стратегии институциональных реформ: Китай и Россия

Polterovich, Victor (2006): Стратегии институциональных реформ: Китай и Россия. Published in: Economics and Mathematical Methods , Vol. 42, No. 2 (2006): pp. 3-16.

Abstract

This is the second part of the work devoted to the problem of the choice of institutional reform strategies. In the first part a concept of a promising trajectory was introduced. This is a trajectory that has good chances to be successful since it meets a number of requirements; their list was discussed in detail. In this paper, proposed analytical tools are used to compare reforms in Russia and China. It is shown that China had no significant advantages with respect to initial conditions. However, Chinese reformers, in contrast to the Russian ones, followed theoretical recommendations and choosed promising trajectories as their strategies. This observation explains the difference in the reform outcomes, and may be also considered as evidence in favor of the theory suggested.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Institutional Reform Strategies: China and Russia
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: institutional reforms; institutional reform strategies; promising trajectory; economic transition; Russia; China
• Subjects: P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P21 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General

References

Гельбрас В. (2001): Экономически реформы в России и Китае: попытка сравнения.

Гэлбрейт Дж.К., Крытинская Л., Ванг К. (2004): Растущее неравенство в России и Китае // Мир перемен. № 2.

Лахман И.Л., Левин М.И., Полтерович В.М. (1987): Механизм договорных цен. Известия АН СССР. Серия экономическая. № 3.

Лахман И.Л., В.М. Полтерович (1990): Формирование рынка потребительских товаров // Вопр. экономики. № 12.

Мау В. (2005): Перестройка сквозь призму двух десятилетий // Россия в глобальной политике. Т. 3. № 2. Март–апрель.

Полтерович В.М. (1986): Оптимальное распределение ресурсов по стабильным и договорным ценам (модель синтеза механизмов) // Экономика и мат. методы. Т. 22. № 5.

Полтерович В.М. (2001): Трансплантация экономических институтов // Экономическая наука современной России. № 3.

Полтерович В. М.(2002): Экономическая культура и трансформационный спад // Экономика и мат. методы. Т. 38. № 4.

Полтерович В. М. (2004): Институциональные ловушки: есть ли выход? // Общественные науки и современность. № 3.

Полтерович В.М. (2006): Стратегии институциональных реформ. Перспективные траектории // Экономика и мат. методы. Т. 42. № 1.

Полтерович В. М., Старков О.Ю. (2005): Создание массовой ипотеки в России: проблема трансплантации//№R2 - 2005. Санкт-Петербург: С.-Пб.ГУ, НИИ Менеджмента.

Полтерович В. М., Старков О.Ю., Черных Е.В. (2005): Строительное общество: ипотечный институт для России // Вопр. экономики. № 1.

Попов В.В. (2002): Три капельки воды. Заметки некитаиста о Китае. М.: Дело.

Bai C.-E., Li D.D., Qian Y. and Wang Y. (1999): Anonymous Banking and Financial Repression: How Does China’s Reform Limit Government Predation without Reducing Its Revenue? Conference paper № F 29. The 4th Annual International Conference on Transition Economics. Beijing, July.

Boycko M., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1995): Privatizing Russia. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Bruno M. (1993): Crisis, Stabilization, and Economic Reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Cao Y. Z., Fan G., Woo W.T. (1997): Chinese Economic Reforms: Past Successes and Future Challenges. In: W.T.Woo, S.Parker, J.D.Sachs (eds.). Economies in Transition. Comparing Asia and Europe. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Djankov S. (1999): Ownership Structure and Enterprise Restructuring in Six Newly Independent States. Comparative Economic Studies Vol. XXXXI. № 1.

Lau B.H., Qian Y., and Roland G. (2000): Reform without Losers: An Interpretation of China's Dual-Track Approach to Transition // J. of Political Economy. Vol. 108. № 1.

Li D. (1998): Changing Incentives of the Chinese Bureaucracy. AEA Papers and Proceedings. Vol. 88. № 2.

Lin J.K., Tao R., and Liu M. (2003): Decentralization, Deregulation and Economic Transition in China.

McDonnell B.H. (2004): Lessons from the Rise and (Possible) Fall of Chinese Township-Village Enterprises. Univ. of Minnesota. Law School. Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series. Research Paper № 03–13.

Qian Y. (1999a): The Process of China's Market Transition (1978-1998): The Evolutionary, Historical, and comparative Perspectives. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics symposium on "Big-Bang Transformation of Economic Systems as Challenge to New Institutional Economics", June 9–11, 1999, Wallerfangen/Saar, Germany.

Qian Y. (1999b): The Institutional Foundations of China's Market Transition. World Bank's Annual Conference on Development Economics. Washington, D.C., April, 1999.

Qian Y. (2003): How Reform Worked in China. In: D. Rodrik (ed). In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Saez L. and Yang J. (2001): The Deregulation of State-Owned Enterprises in India and China. Comparative Economic Studies, XLIII, No.3.

Stiglitz J.E. (2000): Capital Market Liberalization, Economic Growth, and Instability. World Development. Vol. 28. № 6.

Wang X., Xu L.C., and Zhu T. (2001): State-Owned Enterprises Going Public: The Case of China. DSGD Discussion Paper № 21.

Weitzman M., Hu C. (1994): Chinese township village enterprises as vague defined cooperatives// J. of Comparative Economics. Vol. 18. № 2.