Zakharenko, Roman (2010): Children Versus Ideas: an “Influential” Theory of Demographic Transition.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_22220.pdf Download (331kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, I propose a theory of demographic transition and associated growth of the stock of knowledge that posits social influence as a key determinant of these phenomena. Individuals are influenced by ideas developed in the previous generation; their goal is to maximize their own social influence, that is, the extent to which their ideas have been used by the next generation. With high communication costs, one's ideas are utilized mainly by his/her children, which creates an incentive to have as many children as possible. With modern communication technologies, one's ideas can be used by millions, which makes people invest time into improvement of own ideas rather than production of children. Even those who can influence only their own children are induced to have smaller families and improve own ideas, because their children now have access not only to ideas of parents but also to ideas from the outside world.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Children Versus Ideas: an “Influential” Theory of Demographic Transition |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | demographic transition, social influence, economic growth |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J13 - Fertility ; Family Planning ; Child Care ; Children ; Youth O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification |
Item ID: | 22220 |
Depositing User: | Roman Zakharenko |
Date Deposited: | 28 Apr 2010 00:14 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 00:53 |
References: | Gary S. Becker. An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, pages 225-256. UMI, 1960. Gary S. Becker and H. Gregg Lewis. On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. The Journal of Political Economy, 81(2):S279-S288, 1973. Gary S. Becker, Kevin M. Murphy, and Robert Tamura. Human capital, fertility, and economic growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5):S12-S37, 1990. Alberto Bisin and Thierry Verdier. On the cultural transmission of preferences for social status. Journal of Public Economics, 70(1):75 - 97, 1998. Alberto Bisin and Thierry Verdier. The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(2):298 - 319, 2001. Alberto Bisin, Giorgio Topa, and Thierry Verdier. Religious intermarriage and socialization in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 112(3):615-664, 2004. Susan Blackmore. The meme machine. Oxford University Press, 2000. David G. Blanchflower and Andrew J. Oswald. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-8):1359 - 1386, 2004. Robert Boyd and Peter J. Richerson. The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford University Press, 2005. John C. Caldwell. Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review, 2(3/4):321-366, 1976. Harold L. Cole, George J. Mailath, and Andrew Postlewaite. Social norms, savings behavior, and growth. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6):1092, 1992. Richard Dawkins. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, 1976. C. Simon Fan and Oded Stark. Looking at the population problem through the prism of heterogeneity: Welfare and policy analyses. International Economic Review, 49:799- 835(37), August 2008. Eliana La Ferrara, Alberto Chong, and Suzanne Duryea. Soap operas and fertility: Evidence from Brazil. RES Working Papers 4573, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department, June 2008. Oded Galor and Omer Moav. Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4):1133 - 1191, 2002. Oded Galor and David N. Weil. The gender gap, fertility, and growth. The American Economic Review, 86(3):374-387, 1996. Oded Galor and David N. Weil. Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. The American Economic Review, 90(4):806-828, 2000. L. P. Greksa. Population growth and fertility patterns in an Old Order Amish settlement. Annals of Human Biology, 29(2):192 - 201, 2002. Sergei Guriev and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya. (Un)Happiness in Transition. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23:143-168(26), 2009. W. D. Hamilton. The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1):1 - 16, 1964. Joseph Henrich and Francisco J. Gil-White. The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3):165 - 196, 2001. Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan. A stochastic model of mortality, fertility, and human capital investment. Journal of Development Economics, 70:103-118(16), 2003. Hans-Peter Kohler, Francesco C. Billari, and Jose Antonio Ortega. The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28(4): 641-680, 2002. Lesley Newson, Tom Postmes, S.E.G. Lea, Paul Webley, Peter J. Richerson, and Richard McElreath. Influences on communication about reproduction: the cultural evolution of low fertility. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(3):199 - 210, 2007. Vasily Peskov. Lost in the Taiga: One Russian Family's Fifty-Year Struggle for Survival and Religious Freedom in the Siberian Wilderness. Doubleday, 1994. Arthur J. Robson. Status, the distribution of wealth, private and social attitudes to risk. Econometrica, 60(4):837-857, 1992. Arthur J. Robson. The biological basis of economic behavior. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(1):11-33, 2001. Robert Tamura. Human capital and economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 79(1):26 - 72, 2006. World Values Survey 1981-2008. World Values Survey Association, official aggregate v.20090901 edition, 2009. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/22220 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Children Versus Ideas: an “Influential” Theory of Demographic Transition. (deposited 23 Sep 2009 16:50)
- Children Versus Ideas: an “Influential” Theory of Demographic Transition. (deposited 28 Apr 2010 00:14) [Currently Displayed]