Trade Competitiveness, Subsidies and Barriers to Trade:Implication for Indian Agriculture

Bandhu, Yogesh (2009): Trade Competitiveness, Subsidies and Barriers to Trade:Implication for Indian Agriculture.

Abstract

Agriculture in India is the most important segment of the economy. Growth of Agricultural sector is crucial for Indian economy as it employs two-third of its population and contributes nearly one-third of national income. However its importance in the economic, social and political fabric of India goes well beyond what is indicated by its contribution to the economy. The large number of poor agricultural households and their income vulnerability are major concern among policy makers. These concerns have driven both agricultural policies and public expenditures in agriculture in India as well as in other part of the globe. India made significant advances towards achieving its goal of rapid agricultural growth, improving food security, and reducing rural poverty during the last four decades. Sustainable food production growth enabled India to achieve foodgrain self sufficiency, eliminating the threat of famines and acute starvation in the country. More rapid agricultural productivity growth, as past experiences shows, can have major impacts on poverty reduction trough direct effects on producers income, indirect effects on consumer welfare trough changes in food prices, employment and wage effects, and growth induced effects throughout the economy. Agriculture is also one of the major sources of export earnings of our country and is crucial for improving the balance of payments. In recent years, the export of agricultural and allied products accounted for about one-fifth of total export earnings of India. India's share of agricultural export has remained very low in many commodities despite inherent strength of Indian agriculture with the exception of few commodities. The performance of agricultural export depends not only on adequate surplus, international prices, quality of product, market competition and comparative advantage of producing the exportable commodities but also on domestic and international trade policy. Hence the subsidies and supports to agricultural commodities of country play a major role to stand in international market. Present paper is an effort to evaluate competitiveness of Indian wheat and rice in international market. Keeping in view the overall foodgrain production, marketable surplus and number of farmers, among the major foodgrain producing states, Uttar Pradesh has been taken for comparison of trade competitiveness. Since agricultural trade is highly distorted due to huge subsidies and support to agriculture in developed countries; paper also evaluate competitiveness of these commodities in alternative case if both countries withdraw their subsidies to these commodities in form of Producer Support Estimate (PSE). The Paper is divided in four parts; Part one is about the methodology to calculate competitiveness. Trade competitiveness of wheat and rice at normal prices and at PSE adjusted prices has been calculated in part two. Part three evaluate the implications of agricultural subsidy and part four is the concluding part with suggesting some corrective measures for fair agricultural trade and due space of developing countries in international agricultural trade.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Trade competitiveness, Subsidies, WTO, Indian Agriculture
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F0 - General > F00 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q17 - Agriculture in International Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade

References

1. ABARE (Australian Board of Agriculture and Resource Economics), (2000) “U.S. and E.U. Agricultural Support: Who does it Benefit”, October Issue, Canberra.

2. Bhalla, G.S. (2004), “Globalisation and Agriculture” Academic Foundation, New Delhi.

3. Cahill, C. and W. Legg (1990), “Estimation of Agricultural Assistance Using Producer and Consumer Subsidy Equivalents: Theory and Practice”, OECD Economic Studies, Number 13, pp. 13-42.

4. Diwakar D.M. (1993), “Incentive to India’s Wheat and Rice Growers”, The Bihar Journal of Agricultural Marketing, Vol.II, No. 2.

5. Food and Agriculture Organization (2004). “FAOSTAT”, FAO Statistical Database, (Online). Available at http://faostat.fao.org/default.jsp [Last visited on May 01, 2006].

6. Government of India (2003). “Agricultural Statistics at a Glance, Ministry of Agriculture”, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, New Delhi. (Online). Available at http://agricoop.nic.in/statatglance2003.htm [Last visited on May 01, 2006].

7. Gulati, A., J. Hanson and G. Pursell (1990). “Effective Incentives in India’s Agriculture Cotton Groundnuts, Wheat and Rice”. World Bank, Policy, Planning and Research Working Paper No. WPS 332, January.

8. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2004) “Producer and Consumer Support Estimates OECD Database, 1986-2003”, Available at: http://www.oecd.org/document/

9. P. Parthapratim (2005), “current WTO Negotiations on Domestic Subsidies in agriculture: implications for India”, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, Working Paper no. 177.

10. Pursell G. and A. Gupta. (1996). “Trade Policies and Incentives in Indian Agriculture: Background Statistics and Protection and Incentive Indicators, 1965-95”, World Bank, International Economics Department, Washington, DC. Background Paper no. 1,

11. WTO. (2002). “Trade Policy Review: India, Report by the Secretariat”, World Trade Organization, Geneva, March 2, WT/TPR/S/100.