Veblen goods and neighbourhoods: endogenising consumption reference groups

Barrington-Leigh, Christopher P (2008): Veblen goods and neighbourhoods: endogenising consumption reference groups.

Abstract

One of the significant developments in the last four decades of economics is the growing empirical evidence that individual consumption preferences, as mea- sured by self-reported life satisfaction, are neither fixed nor self-centred but are instead overwhelmingly dominated by externalities, partly in the form of reference levels set by others and by one’s own experience. Welfare analysis recognising this fact is likely to indicate enormous revisions for macroeconomic policy and social objectives as well as for what is taught in economics at all levels. Yet the task of constructing general equilibrium models based on this microeconomic re- ality is still in its infancy. In this work I take the conventional stance that decision makers understand their own utility function. Therefore, they can choose the mi- lieu in which they immerse themselves with the sophisticated understanding that it will affect their own consumption reference levels and therefore the degree of satisfaction they derive from their private consumption. At the same time, their private consumption will help to set the reference level for others in their chosen group. I treat theoretically the problem of such endogenous formation of consump- tion reference groups in the context of a simultaneous choice of neighbourhoods and home consumption amongst a heterogenous population. For both discrete and continuous distributions of types, I find general equilibrium outcomes in which differentiation of neighbourhoods occurs endogenously and I compare the welfare implications of growth in such economies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: reference income; veblen goods; consumption reference groups; club goods
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R23 - Regional Migration ; Regional Labor Markets ; Population ; Neighborhood Characteristics

References

C. P. Barrington-Leigh and John F. Helliwell. Empathy and emulation: life satisfaction and the urban geography of veblen effects. 2007.

A.E. Clark and A.J. Oswald. Comparison-concave utility and following behaviour in social and economic settings. Journal of Public Economics, 70(1):133–155, 1998.

Andrew E. Clark, Paul Frijters, and Michael A. Shields. Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. The Jour- nal of Economic Literature, 46(1):95–144, 2008. URL http://www.aeaweb.org/ articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.46.1.95. doi:10.1257/jel.46.1.95.

R.M. Corless, G.H. Gonnet, D.E.G. Hare, D.J. Jeffrey, and D.E. Knuth. On the Lam- bertW function. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 5(1):329–359, 1996.

E.W. Dunn, T.D. Wilson, and D.T. Gilbert. Location, Location, Location: The Mis- prediction of Satisfaction in Housing Lotteries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11):1421–1432, 2003.

B. Curtis Eaton and Mukesh Eswaran. Well-being and affluence in the presence of a veblen good. February 2006.

G.G. Kingdon and J. Knight. Community, Comparisons and Subjective Well-being in a Divided Society. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 2007.

G. Loewenstein, T. O’Donoghue, and M. Rabin. Projection bias in predicting future utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4):1209–1248, 2003.

Erzo F. P. Luttmer. Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quar- terly Journal of Economics, 120(3):963–1002, August 2005.

K. Marx and F. Engels. Marx engels selected works. Progress Publishers (1986), 1848.

L. Rayo and G.S. Becker. Evolutionary Efficiency and Mean Reversion in Happiness. mimeographed, University of Chicago, 2004.

J.M. Rothstein. Good principals or good peers? Parental valuation of school character- istics, tiebout equilibrium, and the incentive effects of competition among jurisdic- tions. The American economic review, 96(4):1333–1350, 2006.

S. Scotchmer. Local Public Goods and Clubs. Handbook of Public Economics, 4: 1997–2042, 2002.

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference- Dependent Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4):1039–1061, 1991.