Joris, Drayer and Daniel, Rascher (2010): Simulation in Sport Finance. Published in: Simulation & Gaming , Vol. 41, No. 2 (2010): pp. 231-237.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_25805.pdf Download (48kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Simulations have long been used in business schools to give students experience making real-world decisions in a relatively low-risk environment. The OAKLAND A’S BASEBALL BUSINESS SIMULATOR takes a traditional business simulation and applies it to the sport industry where sales of tangible products are replaced by sales of an experience provided to fans. The simulator asks students to make decisions about prices for concessions, parking, and merchandise, player payroll expenses, funding for a new stadium, and more. Based on these inputs, the program provides detailed information about the state of the franchise after each simulated year, including attendance, winning percentage, revenues vs. expenses, revenue sharing, and stadium financing. The use of simulations such as this one enhances students’ organizational skills and students’ ability to think critically and imaginatively about the data while applying relevant knowledge and an appropriate strategy to achieve the best possible results. This is particularly important in the field of sport management where few, if any, other simulators exist that are specific to the field.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Simulation in Sport Finance |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | baseball business; computer-based learning; simulation/gaming; stadium/facility financing; sport finance; sport management |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L83 - Sports ; Gambling ; Restaurants ; Recreation ; Tourism |
Item ID: | 25805 |
Depositing User: | Daniel Rascher |
Date Deposited: | 12 Oct 2010 18:22 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:57 |
References: | Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by doing. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Cartstens, A. & Beck, J. (2005). Get ready for the gamer generation. TechTrends, 49(3), 22-25. DeKanter, N. (2005). Gaming redefines interactivity for learning. TechTrends, 49(3), 26-31. Harper, B., Squires, D., & McDougall, A. (2000). Constructivist simulations: A new design paradigm. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia, 9(2), 115-130. Jones, K. (1980). Simulations: A handbook for teachers. New York, NY: Nichols Publishing. Klopfer, E. & Yoon, S. (2005). Developing games and simulations for today and tomorrow’s tech savvy youth. TechTrends, 49(3), 33-41. Mullin, B. J., Hardy, S., & Sutton, W. A. (2007). Sport marketing (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Peters, V. A. & Vissers, G. A. (2004). A simple classification model for debriefing simulation games. Simulation & Gaming, 35(1), 70-84. Quinn, C. N. (2005). Engaging learning: Designing e-learning simulation games. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. United States Department of Education (2005). Digest of education statistics. Retrieved May 17, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d05/tables/dt05_419.asp?referer=list. Willis, J., Hovey, L., & Hovey, K. G. (1987). Computer simulations: A source book to learning in an electronic environment. New York, NY: Garland Publishing. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/25805 |