The Feldstein –Horioka Puzzle and structural breaks: evidence from EU members.

Ketenci, Natalya (2010): The Feldstein –Horioka Puzzle and structural breaks: evidence from EU members.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the level of capital mobility in European Union members using the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle proposed by Feldstein and Horioka (1980) in order to investigate relations between saving and investment flows. In this paper, data for 27 European countries were used over the period of 1995-2009 on the quarterly basis. Data were extracted from the official statistical site of the European Union, Eurostat. Firstly, unit root tests were applied to the series in order to estimate the stationarity of the model variables. Two different tests were used, which are the Ng and Perron (2001) unit root test procedure and approach proposed by Zivot and Andrews (1992) for unit root test allowing for a structural shift. Then the Bai and Perron (1998) structural break test was applied to determine the presence of structural breaks in series. In most countries except Belgium and Finland UDmax and WD max tests rejected the hypothesis of no breaks. Moreover, structural break locations for every series were selected by sequentially procedure, BIC and LWZ. Finally, the cointegration relationships between investment and saving flows of European Union members were tested. Three different cointegration techniques were applied to the data. Firstly, the Johansen (1988) cointegration approach was used for the case of no cointegration shifts, then the Gregory and Hansen (1996) cointegration test was applied, which allows for one structural shift. Finally, again the Johansen’ cointegration approach was used; however, this time with the inclusion of dummy variables related to earlier selected structural break locations.

The empirical results provided stronger evidence of cointegration between investment and saving variables in the case of structural break accommodation compared to the case where the presence of structural breaks was ignored. In most cases of estimations saving-investment correlation has a tendency to increase with regime changes. However, the estimated saving retention coefficient in the presence of structural breaks using the Bai and Perron (1998) approach appeared relatively low in many cases, illustrating by this the openness of estimated countries. In general, world and European countries with time have a tendency to a higher level of their capital market openness. According to Feldstein and Horioka (1980), a higher saving-investment correlation is related to lower capital mobility. Therefore, the contradicting results between saving retention coefficient estimates and cointegration tests illustrate that cointegration indicates a rather current account solvency condition than capital mobility. Estimations of a saving retention coefficient in the presence of structural changes do not support the existence of the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle in the considered EU countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Feldstein-Horioka puzzle, saving-investment association, capital mobility, cointegration, structural breaks, EU.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F32 - Current Account Adjustment ; Short-Term Capital Movements

References

Abbott, A.J., & De Vita, G. (2003). Another piece in the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 50, 69–89.

Apergis, N., & Tsoulfidis, L. (1997). The relationship between saving and finance: Theory and evidence from E.U. countries. Research in Economics, 51, 333-258.

Apergis, N., & Tsoumas, C. (2009). A survey on the Feldstein Horioka puzzle: What has been done and were we stand. Research in Economics. Forthcoming.

Argimon, I., & Roldan, J.M. (1994). Saving, investment and international capital mobility in EC countries. European Economic Review, 38, 59-67.

Armstrong, H., Balasubramabyam, V., & Salisu, M. (1996). Domestic savings, intra-national and intra-European union capital flows, 1971-1991. European Economic Review, 40, 1229-1235.

Artis, M., & Bayoumi, T. (1991). Global financial integration and current account imbalances. In: Alogoskoufis, G., Papademos, L. & Portes, R. (Eds.). External constraints on Macroeconomic Policy: The European Experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bai, J., & Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 66, 47-68.

Bai, J., & Perron, P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 1–22.

Bajo-Rubio, O., 1998. The saving-investment correlation revisited: The case of Spain, 1964-1994. Applied Economics Letters, 5, 769-772.

Banerjee, A. & Zanghieri, P. (2003). A new look at the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle using an integrated panel. CEPII Working Paper, 22.

Buch, C.M. (1999). Capital mobility and EU enlargement. Kiel Working Paper, 908.

Caporale, G.M., Panopoulou, E., & Pittis, N. (2005). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle revisited: a monte carlo study. Journal of International Money and Finance, 24, 1143-49.

Coakley, J., & Kulasi, F. (1997). Cointegration of long run saving and investment. Economics Letters, 54, 1 – 6.

Coakley, J., Kulasi, F., & Smith, R. (1988). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle and capital mobility: A review. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 3, 169-188.

Coakley, J., Kulasi, F., & Smith, R. (1996). Current account solvency and the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle. Economic Journal, 106, 620−627.

Corbin, A. (2001). Country specific effect in the Feldstein-Horioka paradox: a panel data analysis. Economics Letters, 72(3), 297-302.

De Vita, G., & Abbott, A. (2002). Are saving and investment cointegrated? An ARDL bounds testing approach. Economics Letters, 77, 293–299.

Dooley, M., Frankel, J.A., & Mathieson, D.J. (1987). International capital mobility: what do saving-investment correlations tell us? International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 34, 503 – 530.

Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T.J., & Stock, J.H. (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica, 64, 813-836.

Feldstein, M., & Bachetta, P. (1991). National saving and international investment. In: Bernheim, D., & Shoven, J. (Eds.). National Saving and Economic Perfomance. The University of Chicago Press.

Feldstein, M., & Horioka, C. (1980). Domestic saving and international capital flows. Economic Journal, 90, 314–329.

Fouquau, J., Hurlin, C., & Rabaud, I. (2008). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: A panel smooth transition regression approach. Economic Modelling, 25, 284-299.

Frankel, J. A. (1992). Measuring international capital mobility – A review. American Economic Review, 82, 197-202.

Golub, S. (1990). International capital mobility: Net versus gross stocks and flows. Journal of International Money and Finance, 9, 424-439.

González, A., Teräsvirta, T., & van Dijk, D. (2005). Panel smooth transition regression model.Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, 604.

Gregory, A.W., & Hansen, B.E. (1996). Tests for cointegration in models with trend and regime shifts. Oxford Bulletin for Economics and Statistics, 58(3), 555-560.

Herwartz, H., & Xu, F. (2010). A functional coefficient model view of the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Journal of International Money and finance, 29, 37-54.

Ho, T.W. (2002). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle revisited. Journal of International Money and Finance, 21, 555-564.

Ho, T.W. (2003). The saving-retention coefficient and country-size: The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle reconsidered. Journal of Macroecnomics, 25, 387-396.

Hussein, K.A. (1998). International capital mobility in OECD countries: The Feldstein-Horioka ‘puzzle’ revisited. Economic Letters, 59, 237-242.

Jansen, W.J. (1996). Estimating saving-investment correlations: evidence for OECD countries based on an error correction model. Journal of International Money and Finance, 15, 749-81.

Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-54.

Kejriwal, M. (2008). Cointegration with structural breaks: An application to the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 12(1), article 3.

Kollias, C., Mylonidis, N., & Paleologou, S.M. (2008). The Feldstein- Horioka puzzle across EU members: Evidence from the ARDL bounds approach and panel data. International Review of Economics and Finance, 17, 380-387.

Kumar, S., & Bhaskara, R.B. (2009). A time series approach to the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle with panel data from the OECD countries. MPRA Paper 18464, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Leachman, L., (1990). Causality between investment and savings rates: Inferences for the international mobility of capital among OECD countries. International Economic Journal, 4(3), 23-39.

Liu, J., Wu, S., & Zidek, J.V. (1997). On segmented multivariate regressions. Statistica Sinica, 7, 497-525.

Mastroyiannis, A. (2007). Current account dynamics and the Feldstein and Horioka puzzle: the case of Greece. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 4(1), 91-99.

Miller, S.M. (1988). Are saving and investment cointegrated? Economics Letters, 27, 31 – 34.

Murphy, R.G. (1984). Capital mobility and the relationship between saving and investment in OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 3, 327-342.

Nell, K.S., & Santos, L.D. (2008). The Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis versus the long-run solvency constraint model: A critical assessment. Economics Letters, 98, 66-70.

Ng, S., & Perron, P. (2001). Lag selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica, 69, 1519–1554.

Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2000). Perspectives on OECD economic integration: Implications for U.S. Current Account Adjustment. UC Berkeley: Center for International and Development Economics Research. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/16z3s2s2

Ozkan, I., Erden, L., & Turksen, I. (2009). A fuzzy analysis of country-size argument for the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle, Information Sciences: an International Journal, 179(16), 2754-2761.

Ozmen, E. & Parmaksız, K. (2003). Policy regime change and the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: the UK evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25, 137-149.

Pelagidis, T., & Mastroyiannis, T., 2003. The saving investment-correlation in Greece, 1960-1997: Implications for capital mobility. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25, 609-616.

Penati, A., & Dooley, M. (1984). Current account imbalances and capital formation in industrial countries, 1949 – 1981. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 31, 1 – 24.

Perron, P., & Ng, S. (1996). Useful Modifications to Some Unit Root Tests with Dependent Errors and their Local Asymptotic Properties. Review of Economic Studies, 63, 435-463.

Sinha, T., & Sinha, D. (2004). The mother of all puzzles would not go away. Economic Letters, 82, 259-267.

Sinn, S., (1992). Saving-investment correlations and capital mobility: On the evidence from annual data. Economic Journal, 102, 1162-1170.

Telatar, E., Telatar, F., & Bolatoglu, N. (2007). A regime switching approach to the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: Evidence from some European countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(3), 523-533.

van Dijk, D., Fok, D., & Franses, P.H. (2005). A multi-level panel STAR model for US manufacturing sectors. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(6), 811-827.

Vasudeva Murthy, N. R. (2009). The Feldstein–Horioka puzzle in Latin American and Caribbean countries: a panel cointegration analysis. Journal of Economics and Finance, 33(2), 176-188.

Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. (1992). Further evidence of great crash, the oil price shock and unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.