Regionale Innovationssysteme der EU im Prozess der Globalisierung

Christian, Dreger and Georg, Erber (2010): Regionale Innovationssysteme der EU im Prozess der Globalisierung.

Abstract

The global competition in innovation has significantly intensified over the past decades. New large countries like China, India, Brazil and Russia are challenging the traditional incum-bents like the US, Europe and Japan in this area. By accelerating the integration of the previ-ously predominant national innovation systems towards a European Innovation Union the European Commission is aiming to make significant progress as part of the 2020 strategy. By creating regional innovation clusters, by further international enhancing respective networks with other global innovation centres globally and further specialization of regional innova-tion locations the available capacities in Europe should better utilized and further strength-ened. As a part of the 7th EU-Framework Program the project „Intangible Assets and Re-gional Growth” has made significant contributions through academic research. In particular the creation of innovative milieus in regional innovation systems and the attraction and fur-ther qualification of human capital are key drivers for the success of such locations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Regional EU-Innovationsystems under Transformation in the Process of Globalisation
• Language: German
• Keywords: Regional Innovation Systems, Innovation Policy, Globalisation
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

References

Audretsch; D., Keilbach, M. (2004), Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Performance, In: Regional Studies, 38(8), 2004, 949 – 959.

Buerger, M., Broekel, T., Coad, A. (2009), Regional Dynamics of Innovation - Investigating the Co-Evolution of Patents, R&D, and Employment, Urban and Regional Research Center, Utrecht University, WP 09/2009 in der Reihe Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, Utrecht. 2009.

Bundesregierung (2009), Nationaler Entwicklungsplan Elektromobilität der Bundesregierung, Berlin, August 2009

Carlsson, B. (2006), Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 2006, 35, 56–67.

Chesbrough, H. W.(2003), Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.

Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W. und West, J.. Hrsg.: (2006), Open Innovation. Re-searching a New Paradigm, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., Stern, S. (2001), Clusters, Convergence, and Economic Performance, August 2010.

Dreger, Ch., Erber, G. (2008),: Humankapital und Wirtschaftswachstum in den Regionen der EU, In: DIW Wochenbericht, 29/2008, Jg. 75, 402-408.

Edquist, Ch. (1997), Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London and Washington, Pinter, 1997.

Erber, G. (2010), The Design of Regional Innovation Systems, IAREG ( Intangible Assets and Regional Economic Growth) Working Paper WP6/01, Berlin, Februar 2010.

Erber, G. (2008),: Regional Patterns of Venture Capital Financing in the US, IAREG-WP 2008/WP3-04, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin, 2008.

Erber, G. (2007), Große Potentiale der Nanotechnologie in Deutschland, In: DIW Wochenbericht 2007/25, Jg.74, 393-396.

Erber, G., Hagemann, H. (2007), Deutsche Innovationspolitik: Herausforderungen im Zuge der Globalisierung, In. DIW Wochenbericht 2007/16, Jg. 74, 231-234.

Freemanm Ch. (1995), The „National System of Innovation“ in historical perspective. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1995, 19, 5–24.

Freeman, R. (2005), Does Globalization of the Scientific/Engineering Workforce Threaten U. S. Economic Leadership? NBER Working Paper No. 11457, National Bureau of Economic Research. London.

Godin, B. (2006), The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework. In: Science, Technology & Human Values, 2006, 31, 639-667.

Helpman, E. Hrsg. (1994), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994.

Knoben, J. (2009),: Localized inter-organizational linkages, agglomeration effects, and the innovative performance of firms, In: The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 43, No. 3, 757-779

Lee, C.-M., Miller, W. F, Hancock, H. G., Rowen: H. S. (2000), The Silicon Valley edge. A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship, Princeton University Press, Princeton .

Malerba, F. (2002),: Sectoral Systems of innovation and production. In: Research Policy, 2002, 31 (29), 247–265.

Malerba, F. (2004), Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Malerba, F. (2005), Sectoral Systems of Innovation: A Framework for Linking Innovation to the Knowledge Base, Structure and Dynamics of Sectors. In: Econom-ics of Innovation and New Technology, 2005, 14, 63–82.

Nelson, R. R. (Hrsg.) (1993), National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993.

NYT (2009), Backpedaling, China eases proposal to ban exports of some vital minerals, In: New York Times, Meldung vom 4. September 2009.

O'Neill, J. (2001), Building Better Economic BRICs, Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper No: 66, 30th November 2001.

Porter, M. E: Regions and the New Economics of Competition,” in: A.J. Scott (ed.), Global City-Regions, Trends, Theory, and Policy, New York: Ox-ford University Press, 2001, 145-151.

Spiegel-Online (2010), Strom und Auto aus einer Hand, Meldung vom 16. September 2010.

Saxenian, A. (2007), The New Argonauts - Regional Advantage in a Global Econ-omy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2007.

Saxenian, A. (1994), Regional Advantages: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1994.

Soete, B. (2006), Biotechnologie im Vergleich - Wo steht Deutschland? Hans-Böckler-Stiftung; 2006.

Su Qiang (2010), Rare earth will not be used as bar-gaining chip: Wen, In: China Daily, meld-ing vom 8. Oktober 2010.

Xinhua (2010), China's Chinalco to invest 10b yuan in rare earth sector, In. China Daily, Meldung vom 28. September 2010.

von Bertalanffy, L. (1978), General System Theory. New York.

von Hippel, E. (2006),: Democratizing Innovation, The MIT Press, Boston, Massachusetts 2006.

Wan Zhihong, Li Fangfang (2010), Alliance drives promotion of electric cars, In: China Daily, Meldung vom 19. August 2010.

Weiszmann, M. L. (1998),: Recombinant Growth, In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, Vol. 113(2), 331-360.

Widmer, T., Beywl, W., Fabian, F.(2009), Evaluation – Ein systematisches Handbuch, Part 8, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg – New York, 283-294.