Croson, Rachel and Konow, James (2007): Double Standards: Social Preferences and Moral Biases.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_2729.pdf Download (317kB) | Preview |
Abstract
A consensus seems to be emerging in economics that at least three motives are at work in many strategic decisions: distributive preferences, reciprocal preferences and self-interest. An important obstacle to this research, however, has been moral biases, i.e., the distortions created by self-interest that can obscure social preferences. Among other things, this has led to disagreement about the relative importance of distributive preferences, reciprocal preferences, or both. This paper describes a simple experiment that decomposes behavior into these three forces and examines their interactions without the confounds that have compromised other designs. We compare the decisions of implicated “stakeholders” with those of impartial “spectators,” who have no stake. Several surprising and interesting results emerge. For example, stakeholders respond less forcefully to kindness and unkindness towards them than do spectators acting on their behalf. We also find an asymmetry in reciprocity: stakeholders punish but do not reward, whereas spectators both reward and punish. This result suggests that the lack of positive reciprocity found in other studies is not due to an asymmetry in underlying reciprocal preferences but rather to a moral bias by stakeholders in the application of that preference. More generally, we find that all three hypothesized motives have important and significant effects on final allocations.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Loyola Marymount University |
Original Title: | Double Standards: Social Preferences and Moral Biases |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Reciprocity; fairness; justice; moral bias |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior |
Item ID: | 2729 |
Depositing User: | James Konow |
Date Deposited: | 14 Apr 2007 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 22:18 |
References: | Abbink, Klaus, Irlenbusch, Bernd, and Renner, Elke, 2000, "The Moonlighting Game - An Experimental Study on Reciprocity and Retribution," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 42, 265-277. Akerlof, George A. and Janet Yellen. 1990. "The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment." Quarterly Journal of Economics 105:2, pp. 255-83. Andreoni, James, 1988, "Why Free Ride? Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments." Journal of Public Economics, 97, 291-304. Andreoni, James, 1993, "An Experimental Test of the Public Goods Crowding-Out Hypothesis," American Economic Review, 83(5), 1317-1327. Andreoni, James, Harbaugh, William, and Vesterlund, Lise, 2003, "The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments, and Cooperation," American Economic Review, 93(3), 893-902. Babcock, Linda, Loewenstein, George, Issacharoff, Samuel and Camerer, Colin, 1995, "Biased Judgments of Fairness in Bargaining," American Economic Review, 85(5), 1337-1343. Becker, Gary S., 1974, "A Theory of Social Interactions," Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063-1093. Ben-Ner, Avner, Putterman, Louis, Kong, Fanmin and Magan, Dan, 2004, "Reciprocity in a Two-Part Dictator Game," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 53, 333-352. Berg, Joyce, Dickhaut, John and McCabe, Kevin, 1995, "Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History," Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122-142. Blount, Sally, 1995, "When Social Outcomes Aren't Fair: The Effect of Casual Attributions on Preferences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 131-144. Bolton, Gary E., 1991, "A Comparative Model of Bargaining: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Review, 81(5), 1096-1136. Bolton, Gary E. and Ockenfels, Axel, 2000, "ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition," American Economic Review, 90(1), 166-193. Boyd, Robert, Gintis, Herbert, Bowles, Samuel and Richerson, P.J. 2003, “The Evolution of Altruistic Preferences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 227-238. Brandts, Jordi, and Charness, Gary. "Hot vs. Cold: Sequential Responses and Preference Stability in Experimental Games," Experimental Economics, 2:3, 2000, 227-238. Brosig, Jeannette, and Weimann, Joachim, 2003, "The Hot vs. Cold Effect in a Simple Bargaining Experiment," Experimental Economics, 6(1), 75-90. Carpenter, Jeffrey Paul and Matthews, Peter Hans, 2004, "Social Reciprocity," manuscript, Middlebury College. Cason, Timothy, and Mui, Vai-Lam, 1998, "Social Influence in the Sequential Dictator Game," Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42, 248-265. Cason, Timothy, Saijo, Tatsuyoshi and Yamato, Takehiko, 2002, "Voluntary Participation and Spite in Public Good Provision Experiments: An International Comparison," Experimental Economics, 5(2), 133-153. Charness, Gary, 2004, "Attribution and Reciprocity in an Experimental Labor Market." Journal of Labor Economics 22, 684-708. Charness, Gary, and Rabin, Matthew. 2002, "Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests." Quarterly Journal of Economics 117:3, 817-869. Cherry, Todd L., Frykblom, Peter, and Shogren, Jason F., 2002, "Hardnose the Dictator," American Economic Review, 92(4), 1218-1221. Cox, James C., Friedman, Daniel, and Gjerstad, Steven, 2004, "A Tractable Model of Reciprocity and Fairness," University of Arizona; University of California Santa Cruz, May. Cox, James C., 2004, "How to Identify Trust and Reciprocity," Games and Economic Behavior, 46, 260-281. Croson, Rachel T.A., 1996, "Partners and Strangers Revisited." Economic Letters, 53, 25-32. ----- and Buchan, Nancy, 1999, "Gender and Culture: International Experimental Evidence from Trust Games," American Economic Review, 89(2), 386-391. Dickinson, David L., 2001, "The Carrot Vs. the Stick in Work Team Motivation," Experimental Economics, 4(1), 107-124. Engelmann, Dirk, and Strobel, Martin, 2004, "Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments," American Economic Review, 94(4), 857-869. Falk, Armin and Fischbacher, Urs, 2000, "A Theory of Reciprocity," University of Zurich, (http://www.iew.unizh.ch/wp/iewwp006.pdf) Falk, Armin, Fehr, Ernst and Fischbacher, Urs, 2003, "On the Nature of Fair Behavior," Economic Inquiry, 41(1), 20-26. Falk, Armin, Fehr, Ernst and Fischbacher, Urs, "Testing Theories of Fairness – Intentions Matter," 2000, Working Paper No. 63, Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich. Fehr, Ernst and Fischbacher, Urs, 2004, "Third Party Punishment and Social Norms," Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63-87. Fehr, Ernst and Schmidt, Klaus M., 1999, "A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868. Forsythe, Robert, Horowitz, Joel L., Savin, N. E. and Sefton, Martin, 1994, "Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 1994, 347-369. Frank, Robert, 1988, Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. London: Norton. Gächter, Simon and Riedl, Arno, 2005, "Moral Property Rights in Bargaining," Management Science, 51(2), 249-263. Güth, Werner and Ockenfels, Axel, 2000, “Evolutionary Norm Enforcement,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 156(2), 335-347. Güth, Werner, Schmittberger, Rolf and Schwarze, Bernd, 1982, "An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367-388. Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin, Shachat, Keith, and Smith, Vernon, 1994, “Preferences, Property Rights and Anonymity in Bargaining Games,” Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346-380. Kachelmeier, Steven J., Stephen T. Limberg, and Michael S. Schadewald. 1991. "A Laboratory Market Examination of the Consumer Price Response to Information About Producers' Costs and Profits." The Accounting Review 66:4, pp. 694-717. Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard, 1986a, "Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics," Journal of Business, 59:4, S285-S300. Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard, 1986b, "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," American Economic Review, 76, 728-741. Konow, James, 2005, "Blind Spots: The Effects of Information and Stakes on Fairness Biases," Social Justice Research, 18(4), 349-390. Konow, James, 2000, "Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions," The American Economic Review, 90(4), 1072-1092. Konow, James, 2003, "Which is the Fairest One of All?: A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories," Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1186-1237. Levine, David K., 1998, "Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments," Review of Economic Dynamics, 1, 593-622. McCabe, Kevin A., Rigdon, Mary L. and Smith, Vernon L., 2003, "Positive Reciprocity and Intentions in Trust Games," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52, 267-275. Offerman, Theo, 2002, "Hurting Hurts More Than Helping Helps," European Economic Review, 46, 1423-1437. Rabin, Matthew, 1993, "Incorporating Fairness Into Game Theory and Economics," American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281-1302. Rutström, E. Elisabet, and Williams, Melonie B., 2000, "Entitlements and Fairness: An Experimental Study of Distributive Preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43, 75-89. Smith, Adam, 1759 [1809], The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Glasgow: R. Chapman. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/2729 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Double Standards: Social Preferences and Moral Biases. (deposited 14 Apr 2007) [Currently Displayed]