Determinants of current account in the EU: the relation between internal and external balances in the new members

Ketenci, Natalya and Uz, Idil (2010): Determinants of current account in the EU: the relation between internal and external balances in the new members.

Abstract

This paper considers the major determinants of the current account in the new members of the EU. It examines the long-run and short-run impact of real exchange rate, investment, private and public savings on current account. The bounds testing autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach to cointegration is used and the results indicate that twin deficit exists; in another words, government budget deficit shocks have led to deficit in current accounts in Czech Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia and Slovakia for the considered period. At the same time, empirical evidence was found that private savings, investment and real exchange rate are key variables as well, causing changes in the current account in the long-run as well as in the short-run. Finally, stability tests were applied to the model indicating no evidence of any structural instability in the model of these countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Twin deficit, current account balance, budget deficit, EU.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F40 - General; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F32 - Current Account Adjustment ; Short-Term Capital Movements; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange

References

Abell, J.D., 1990. Twin deficits during the 1980s: an empirical investigation, Journal of Macroeconomics 12, 81-96.

Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. J., Mestre, R., 1998. Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19, 267-283.

Bernheim, B.D., 1988. Budget deficit and balance of trade. In Tax Policy and the Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1-31.

Bordo, M., 2006. Globalization and imbalances in historical perspective. Working Paper No. 13, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

Brown, R.,L., Durbin, J. & Evans, J.M., 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relations over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B-37, 149-192.

Chinn, M.D., Prasad, E.S., 2003. Medium term determinants of current accounts in industrial and developing countries: an empirical exploration. Journal of International Economics 59, 47-76.

Corsetti, G., Mueller, G. 2006. Twin Deficits: squaring theory evidence and common sense, Economic Policy 48, 597-638.

Coughlin, C.C., Pakko, M.R., Pool, W., 2006. How dangerous is the US current account deficit? The Regional Economist, 5-9.

Darrat, A.F., 1988. Have large budget deficits caused rising trade deficits? Southern Economic Journal 54, 879-86.

Dewald, W.G. and Ulan, M. 1990. The Twin Deficit Illusion. Cato Journal 10, 689-707.

Erceg, C.J., Guerrieri, L., Gust, C., 2005. Expansionary fiscal shocks and the trade deficit, International Finance Discussion Papers 825, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Enders, W., Lee, B.S., 1990. Current account and budget deficits: twins or distant cousins? Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 374-82.

Evans, P., 1986. Is the dollar high because of large budget deficit? Journal of Monetary Economics 18, 227-49.

Feldstein, M., Horioka, C., 1980. Domestic saving and international capital flows. The Economic Journal 90, 314-329.

Hendry, D., Richard, J.F. 1982. On the formulation of empirical models in dynamic econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 20, 3-23.

Hendry, D. 1995. On the interaction of unit roots and exogeneity. Econometrics Review 14, 383-419.

Kao, C., McCoskey, S., 1999. Comparing panel data cointegration tests with an application to the ‘twin deficit’ problem. Mimeo, NY: Syracuse University.

Kim, S., Roubini, N., 2008. Twin deficit or twin divergence? Fiscal policy, current account, and real exchange rate in the US, Journal of International Economics 74, 362-383.

Kremers, J. J. M., Ericsson, N. R., Dolado, J. J., 1992. The power of cointegration tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54, 325-348.

Laney, L. O., 1984. The strong dollar, the current account, a federal deficits: cause and effects. Economic Review. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review, 1-14.

McKinnon, R. I., 1980. Exchange rate instability, trade balances, and monetary policies in Japan, Europe, and the US. In P. Oppenheimer (Ed.), Issues in international economics (225-250). Boston: Oriel Press.

Miller, S.M., Russek, F.S., 1989. Are the deficits really related? Contemporary Policy Issues 7, 91-115. Mann, C.L., 2002. Perspectives on the US current account deficit and sustainability, Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, 131-152.

Nielsen, H. B., 2004. Cointegration analysis in the presence of outliers. Econometrics Journal 7, 249-271.

Normandin, M., 1999. Budget deficit persistence and the twin deficit hypothesis. Journal of International Economics 49, 11-93.

Obstfeld, M., Rogoff, K., 2005. Global current account imbalances exchange rate adjustments. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 67-146.

Pakko, M.R. 1999. The US trade deficit and the New Economy. Federal Reserve Bank of St Lois Review, September/October.

Pesaran, M. H., Pesaran, B. 1997. Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., Smith, R. C., 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Economics 16, 289-326.

Phillips, P., Loretan, M. 1991. Estimating long-run equilibria. Review of Econometric Studies 58, 407-36.

Rosensweig, J.A., Tallman, E.W., 1993. Fiscal policy and trade adjustment: are the deficits really twins? Economic Inquiry 31, 580-94.

Saikkonen, P. 1991. Asymptotically efficient estimation of cointegration regressions. Econometric Theory 7, 1-21.

Salvatore, D., 2006. Twin deficits in the G-7 countries and global structural imbalances. Journal of Policy Modelling 28, 701-712.