Nguyen, Khac Minh and Giang, Thanh Long (2005): Efficiency of Construction Firms in Vietnam. Published in: Nguyen Khac Minh and Giang Thanh Long (eds.), Technical Efficiency and Productivity Growth in Vietnam: Parametric and Non-parametric Analyses (20 February 2007): pp. 83-112.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_2872.pdf Download (147kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper uses both parametric and non-parametric approaches to estimate technical efficiency for 2,298 construction firms in Vietnam in the database of the 2002 Economic Census for Enterprises by the General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO). It is found that results from both approaches are consistent, and they could help explain the performance efficiency of these firms. Estimates from the non-parametric approach (data envelopment analysis [DEA] model) and the parametric approach (stochastic frontier production function [SFPF] model) indicate that the average pure technical efficiency of these firms was about 60 percent (58.6% and 57.8% for DEA and SFPF, respectively). Models to test the factors influencing efficiency scores in both approaches show relatively similar results that state firms were more efficient than non-state ones, and location in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh city did have impacts on efficiency scores. However, exploration of the net capital-labor ratio variable show that it did not influence efficiency scores in the DEA model, while it had clear influence in the SFPF model.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | National Economics University (NEU), Hanoi |
Original Title: | Efficiency of Construction Firms in Vietnam |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | construction firms; data envelopment analysis (DEA); stochastic frontier production function (SFPF); Tobit regression; Vietnam |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General L - Industrial Organization > L7 - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction > L74 - Construction |
Item ID: | 2872 |
Depositing User: | Thanh Long Giang |
Date Deposited: | 23 Apr 2007 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 23:40 |
References: | Afriat, S. N. 1972. “Efficiency Estimation of Production Functions.” International Economic Review 3, no. 13: 568–598. Aigner, D. J., and S. F. Chu. 1968. “On Estimating the Industry Production Function.” American Economic Review 58, no. 4: 826–839. Aigner, D.; C. A. K. Lovell; and P. Schmidt. 1977. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics vol. 6: 21–37. Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. 1987. “Prediction of Firm-level Technical Efficiencies with Generalized Frontier Production Function and Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics vol. 38, issue 3: 387–399. _______. 1992. “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India.” Journal of Productivity Analysis vol. 3, no. 1-2 / June, 1992: 153–169. _______. 1995. “A Model for Technical Efficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data.” Empirical Economics vol. 20: 325–332. Burton, F. M. 1991. “A Methodology for Measuring Construction Productivity,” AACE International Transactions; ABI/INFORM Research: L3(1). Coelli, T. J. 1996a. “A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production Function and Cost Function Estimation.” Center for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA) Working Paper 96/07, University of New England. _______. 1996b. “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program.” Center for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA) Working Paper 96/08, University of New England. Edvarsen, D. F. 2003. “Efficiency of Norwegian Construction Firms.” In Four Essays in the Measurement of Production Efficiency, School of Economics and Commercial Law, Goterborg University. El-Mashaleh, M.; W. J. O’Brien; and K. London. n.d. “Envelopment Methodology to Measure and Compare Subcontractor Productivity at the Firm Level.” Accessed from http://cic.vtt.fi/lean/singapore/El-Mashelehetal.pdf on September 3, 2005. Fare, R.; S. Grosskopf; and C. A. K. Lovell. 1985. The Measurement of Production Efficiency. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publication. Farrell, M. J. 1957. “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of Statistical Society Series A (General) 120, no. 3: 253–290. General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO). 2003. Statistical Yearbook 2002. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House. Greene, W. H. 1980. “On the Estimation of a Flexible Frontier Production Function Model.” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 13, issue 1: 101–115. Ingvaldsen, Th.; A. Lakka, A.; A. Nielsen; N. H. Bertelsen; and B. Jonsson. 2004. Productivity Studies in Nordic Building-and Construction Industry. Norwegian Building Research Institute. Jan, J. 1996. Construction Site Productivity Measurement: Selection, Application and Evaluation of Methods and Measures. Doctoral Thesis Summary, Lulea University of Technology. Accessed from http://epubl.luth.se/avslutade/0348-8373/185/index-en.html on October 20, 2005. Kumbhakar, S. C. 1987. “The Specification of Technical and Allocative Inefficiency in Stochastic Production and Profit Frontiers.” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 34, issue 3: 335–348. Kumbhakar, S. C. 1988. “Estimation of Input-specific Technical and Allocative Inefficiency in Stochastic Frontier Models.” Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 3, no. 40: 535–549. Kumbhakar, S. C. 1990. “Production Frontiers, Panel Data, and Time-varying Technical Inefficiency.” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 46, issues 1-2: 201–211. Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs of Vietnam (MOLISA). 2004. Statistical Yearbook of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs 2003. National Steering Committee for Innovation in Construction (NSCIC), Canada. 2003. “The Construction Industry as a Place to Invest.” Presentation from the NSCIC’s Second Canadian Construction Innovation Forum: Building a Strategy for Tomorrow. Nguyen, K. M. 2004. “Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Vietnamese Industry: A Non-Parametric Approach.” In Proceedings of the Regional Workshop Vietnam-Thailand, 40–57. Hanoi: National Economics University. Nguyen, K. M., and Vu, Q. D. 2004. “Non-parametric Analysis of Technical and Scale Efficiencies for Processing Firms in Vietnam Aquaculture.” In Proceedings of the Regional Workshop Vietnam-Thailand, 72–91. Hanoi: National Economics University. Nguyen, K. M., and Giang, T. L. 2004. “On Measuring Efficiency of Hospitals and Medical Centers in Vietnam: A Non-parametric Approach.” Paper prepared for the Regional Economic Development Workshop at Thammasat University, Thailand. Richmond, J. 1974. “Estimating the Efficiency of Production.” International Economic Review 15, no. 2: 515–521. Rorsund, Finn R.; C. A. K. Lovell; and P. Schmidt. 1980. “A Survey of Frontier Production Functions and of their Relationship to Efficiency Measurement.” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 13, issue 1: 5–25. Schmidt, P. 1976. “On the Statistical Estimation of Parametric Frontier Production Functions.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 58: 238–239. Schmidt, P. 1985. “Frontier Production Functions.” Econometric Reviews 4, no. 2: 289–328. VnExpress (Tin nhanh Vietnam). (Various years). http://www.vnexpress.net/Vietnam/Home (in Vietnamese). Wadud, Md. A. 2003. “Technical, Allocative, and Economic Efficiency of Farms in Bangladesh: A Stochastic Frontier and DEA Approach.” Journal of Developing Areas 37, no. 1: 109–126. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/2872 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Efficiency of Construction Firms in Vietnam. (deposited 19 Jan 2007)
- Efficiency of Construction Firms in Vietnam. (deposited 23 Apr 2007) [Currently Displayed]