Ben Youssef, Slim and Zaccour, Georges (2009): Absorptive Capacity, R&D Spillovers, Emissions Taxes and R&D Subsidies.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_29226.pdf Download (162kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, we consider a duopoly competing in quantity, where firms can invest in R&D to control their emissions. We distinguish between efforts carried out to acquire first-hand knowledge (inventive R&D) and efforts made to develop an absorptive capacity to be able to capture part of the knowledge developed by the rival. There are also free R&D spillovers between firms. We show that a regulator can reach the first best by using three regulatory instruments, which are a per-unit emissions tax, a per-unit inventive-research subsidy and a per-unit absorptive-research subsidy. The socially optimal R&D level for inventive research is higher than the one for absorptive capacity, even when the investment-cost parameters for inventive and absorptive research are equal and when there is both very little free spillover and a very high learning parameter. Interestingly, when the free spillover is high enough, the regulator gives a greater per-unit subsidy to inventive research, and when it is low enough and the marginal damage cost of pollution is sufficiently high, he supports absorptive research to strengthen R&D spillovers. Moreover, inventive research is actually taxed when the free spillover is low and the marginal damage cost of pollution is high.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Absorptive Capacity, R&D Spillovers, Emissions Taxes and R&D Subsidies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Pollution Control; Inventive R&D; Absorptive Capacity; Taxes and Subsidies; First Best. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games |
Item ID: | 29226 |
Depositing User: | Slim Ben Youssef |
Date Deposited: | 01 Mar 2011 20:10 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 14:14 |
References: | Ben Youssef, S., 2009, "Transboundary Pollution, R&D Spillovers and International Trade", The Annals of Regional Science, 43, 235-250. Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal, 1989, "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D", The Economic Journal, 99, 569-596. D'Aspremont, C., and A. Jacquemin, 1988, "Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers", The American Economic Review, 78, 1133-1137. D'Aspremont, C., and A. Jacquemin, 1990, "Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers:Erratum", The American Economic Review, 80, 641-642. Dosi, C. and M. Moretto, 1997, "Pollution Accumulation and Firm Incentives to Promote Irreversible Technological Change under Uncertain Private Benefits", Environmental & Resource Economics, 10, 285-300. Farzin, Y.H. and P.M. Kort, 2000, "Pollution Abatement Investment when Environmental Regulation is Uncertain", Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2, 183-212. Fischer, C. and R.G. Newell, 2008, "Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55, 142--162. Hammerschmidt, A., 2009, "No Pain, No Gain: An R&D Model with Endogenous Absorptive Capacity", Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 165,418-437. Jin, J.Y. and M. Troege, 2006, "R&D Competition and Endogenous Spillovers", The Manchester School, 74, 40-51. Jung, C., K. Krutilla and R. Boyd, 1996, "Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: an Evaluation of Policy Alternatives", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 95-111. Kamien, M. I., E. Muller and I. Zang (1992): "Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels", American Economic Review, 82, 1293--1306. Kamien, M.I. and I. Zang, 2000, "Meet me Halfway: Research Joint Ventures and Absorptive Capacity", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 995--1012. Leahy, D. and J.P. Neary, 2007, "Absorptive Capacity, R&D Spillovers, and Public Policy", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 1089-1108. Milliman, S.R. and R. Prince, 1989, "Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 247-265. Requate, T. and W. Unold, 2003, "Environmental Policy Incentives to Adopt Advanced Abatement Technology: Will the True Ranking Please Stand Up?", European Economic Review, 47, 125 -- 146. Wiethaus, L., 2005, "Absorptive Capacity and Connectedness:Why Competing Firms Also Adopt Identical R&D Approaches", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 467-481. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/29226 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Absorptive Capacity, R&D Spillovers, Emissions Taxes and R&D Subsidies. (deposited 28 Aug 2009 01:00)
- Absorptive Capacity, R&D Spillovers, Emissions Taxes and R&D Subsidies. (deposited 01 Mar 2011 20:10) [Currently Displayed]