Nicolosi, S. (2010): Wind power integration, negative prices and power system flexibility - An empirical analysis of extreme events in Germany.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_31834.pdf Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article analyses the flexibility of the German power market with respect to the integration of an increasing share of electricity from renewable energy sources. Flexibility limiting system components, which cause negative prices are explained and illustrated for the German market. Then, the decision of the European Energy Exchange in Leipzig (EEX) to allow negative price bids is explained. Empirical data show the flexibility of conventional generating capacities in Germany during the considered time frame from October 2008 until November 2009. Of the 71 hours with negative spot prices, ten hours were significantly negative with prices of at least -100€/MWh. These extreme hours are analysed in greater detail by the examination of the different system components. Thereby, load, wind power infeed and conventional generation by fuel type are observed as well as the market for negative tertiary reserve as indicators for market tightness. It will be shown that although the market situations were severe, under current conditions it could have been much worse under certain circumstances. Furthermore, the long-run implications of an increasing RES-E share on the conventional generation capacity are discussed. The article concludes with an outlook on additional power system flexibility options.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Wind power integration, negative prices and power system flexibility - An empirical analysis of extreme events in Germany |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Electricity markets, negative prices, renewable electricity integration, wind power |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q41 - Demand and Supply ; Prices D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D41 - Perfect Competition Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities |
Item ID: | 31834 |
Depositing User: | Marco Nicolosi |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jun 2011 19:15 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 10:50 |
References: | Batlle, C. and Pérez-Arriaga, I., 2008. Design criteria for implementing a capacity mechanism in deregulated electricity markets. Utilities Policy 16 (3), 184-193. BDEW, 2010. Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft, Berlin, www.bdew.de. BMU, 2009a. EE in Zahlen - Nationale und internationale Entwicklung, Berlin, www.bmu.de. BMU, 2009b. Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau Erneuerbarer Energien in Deutschland - Leitszenario 2009. www.bmu.de. Brunekreeft, G., Neuhoff, K. and Newbery, D., 2005. Electricity transmission: An overview of the current debate. Utilities Policy 13 (2), 73-93. Cramton, P., 2004. Competitive Bidding Behavior in Uniform-Price Auction Markets, in: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Science. Cramton, P. and Stoft, S., 2008. Forward reliability markets: Less risk, less market power, more efficiency. Utilities Policy, 16(3), 194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2008.01.007. EEX, 2010. European Energy Exchange, Leipzig, www.eex.com. ENTSO-E, 2010. European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity, Brussels, www.entsoe.eu. Hofer, R., 2008. Wirtschaftliche Grundlagen der Stromerzeugung, In: Bartsch, M., Röhling, A., Salje, P., Scholz, U.: Stromwirtschaft – Ein Praxishandbuch. 2. Edition. 410-417. Joskow, P., 2008. Capacity payments in imperfect electricity markets: Need and design. Utilities Policy, 16(3), 159-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2007.10.003. Liese, W., Hobbs, B.F. and Hers, S., 2008. Market Power in the European electricity market – The impacts of dry weather and additional transmission capacity. Energy Policy 36 (4), 1331-1343. Moesgaard, R., and Morthorst, P., 2008. The impact of wind power on electricity prices in denmark. In EWEC 2008,European Wind Energy Conference. Nabe, C., 2006. Effiziente Integration erneuerbarer Energien in den deutschen Elektrizitätsmarkt. Dissertation, TU Berlin. Nicolosi, M. and Fürsch, M., 2009. The Impact of an increasing share of RES-E on the Conventional Power Market – The Example of Germany. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft (3). 246-254. Ockenfels, A., Grimm, V. and Zoettl, G., 2008: Electricity Market Design – The Pricing Mechanism of the Day Ahead Electricity Spot Market Auction on the EEX, http://www.eex.com/de/document/38615/gutachten_eex_ockenfels_e.pdf. Sensfus, F., Ragwitz, M., and Genoese, M. (2008). The merit-order effect: A detailed analysis of the price effect of renewable electricity generation on spot market prices in Germany. Energy Policy 36(8), 3086-3094. Stoft, S., 2002. Power System Economics – Designing Markets for Electricity. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ. Viehmann, J., and Sämisch, H., 2009. Windenergieintegration bei negativen Strompreisen. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 59 (11), 49–51. Wawer, T. (2009): Effizientes Engpassmanagement zur Schaffung eines europäischen Strombinnenmarktes — die Rolle von finanziellen Übertragungsrechten, Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 33 (2), 90-97. Weber, C., 2009. Adequate intraday market design to enable the integration of wind energy into the European power systems, Energy Policy doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.040. Weigt, H. and v. Hirschhausen, C., 2008. Price formation and market power in the German wholesale electricity market in 2006. Energy Policy 36 (11), 4227-4234. Wissen, R., and Nicolosi, M., 2008. Ist der Merit-Order-Effekt der erneuerbaren Energien richtig bewertet? Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 58 (1-2), 110–115. Green, R. J., 2008. Electricity Wholesale Markets: Designs Now and in a Low-carbon Future. The Energy Journal 29 (2), 95-125. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/31834 |