Demand for private tuition classes under the free education policy. Evidence based on Sri Lanka

Pallegedara, Asankha (2011): Demand for private tuition classes under the free education policy. Evidence based on Sri Lanka.

Abstract

Private tuition classes are growing phenomenon in Sri Lanka especially among students who prepare for competitive national school qualifying examinations. It is one of major education issues under the free education policy in Sri Lanka. It can tarnish the real purpose of free education policy. In this paper, we examine the demand for private tuition classes in Sri Lanka by using two waves of Household Income and Expenditure Surveys (HIES) conducted by the Department of Census and Statistics (DCS) of Sri Lanka in 1995/96 and 2006/07. We find that the demand for private tuition classes has increased in recent time among households. It seems that the private tuition expenditure has changed from a luxury good in 1995/96 to a necessity good in 2006/07. If the increased demand for private tuition classes is reflecting parents’ concerns on inadequate and poor, but free education in public schools, the Sri Lanka government needs to reconsider its free education policy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Economics of education; Private tutoring; Tobit model,Demand analysis
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics

References

Athurupane, H. (1999). Econometric Analysis and Planning in the Social Sectors: An Application to Education in Sri Lanka, Quantitative Tools in Economic Planning: Applications and Issues in Asia, United Nations Centre for Regional Development, Nagoya, Japan.

Athurupane, H., Glewwe, P., and Wisniewski, S. (2006).The impact of social quality, Socio- economics factors and child health on Student’s academic performance: Evidence from Sri Lankan primary schools. World Bank Working paper.

Bray, M. (2007). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners, 2nd edition. Fundamentals in Educational Planning. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).

Bray, M., and Kwok, P. (2003). Demand for private supplementary tutoring: Conceptual considerations and socio-economic patterns in Hong Kong. Economics of Education Review, 22, 611–620.

Chay, K.Y. and Powell, J.L. (2001).Semi parametric censored regression models.Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol 15(4), 29-42.

Dang, H.A. (2007). The determinants and impact of private tutoring classes in Vietnam. Economics of Education Review, 26, 684–699

Deaton, A. (1997).The analysis for household surveys microeconometric approach to development policy. MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Department of Census and Statistics (2008), Final Report, Household Income and Expenditure Survey (2006/07), Final Report, Colombo

De Silva, W.A. (1994a).Extra-school tutoring in the Asian context with special reference to Sri Lanka.Maharagama: Department of Educational Research, National Institute of Education.

De Silva, W.A. (1994b).The present status of private tutoring in Sri Lanka.Economic Review (The People's Bank, Colombo) 20(2, 3), 4-7, 20-24.

De Silva, W.A., Gunawardena, C., Jayaweera, S., Perera, L., Rupasinghe, S., and Wijethunga, S. (1991).Extra-school instruction, social equity and educational equality [Sri Lanka].Report prepared for the International Development Research Centre, Singapore.

Ha, T. T., and Harpham, T. (2005). Primary education in Vietnam: Extra classes and outcomes. International Education Journal, 6(5), 626–634.

Himaz, R. (2010). Intrahousehold Allocation of Education Expenditure: The Case of Sri Lanka. Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(2), pages 231-258, 01.

Kakwani N., Soares F., and Son H. H. (2005), Conditional Cash Transfers in African Countries, Working Paper No.6, Brasilia, International Poverty Centre.

Kim, S. and Lee, J.H. (2010). Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic development and cultural change, 58:259–296.

McDonald, J. F., and Moffitt, R. A. (1980). The uses of Tobit analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(2), 318–321.

Powell, J.L. (1984). Least Absolute Deviations Estimation for the Censored Regression Model. Journal of Econometrics, 25: 303-325.

Psacharopoulous, G., and Papakonstantinou, G. (2005). The real university cost in a ‘‘free’’ higher education country. Economics of Education Review, 24(1), 103–108.

Ranasinghe, A. and Hartog, J. (1997). Investment in post-compulsory education in Sri Lanka. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper (TI97 - 021/3), Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Ranasinghe, A., and Hartog, J. (2002). Free education in Sri Lanka. Does it eliminate the family effect? Economics of Education Review, 21:625-633.

Tansel, A. and Bircan, P. (2006). Demand for education in Turkey: A Tobit analysis of private education expenditure. Economics of Education Review, 25,303–313.

Wooldridge, J.M. (2009). Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning. Ohio, USA.

World Bank. (2005). Treasures of the Education System in Sri Lanka: Restoring Performance, Expanding Opportunities and Enhancing Prospects. South Asia. The World Bank.Washinton, DC.