Small worlds and board interlocking in Brazil: a longitudinal study of corporate networks, 1997-2007

Mendes-Da-Silva, Wesley (2011): Small worlds and board interlocking in Brazil: a longitudinal study of corporate networks, 1997-2007.

Abstract

Social Network Analysis (SNA) is an emerging research field in finance, above all in Brazil. This work is pioneering in that it is supported by reference to different areas of knowledge: social network analysis and corporate governance, for dealing with a similarly emerging topic in finance; interlocking boards, the purpose being to check the validity of the small-world model in the Brazilian capital market, and the existence of associations between the positioning of the firm in the network of corporate relationships and its worth. To do so official data relating to more than 400 companies listed in Brazil between 1997 and 2007 were used. The main results obtained suggest that the configuration of the networks of relationships between board members and companies reflects the small-world model. Furthermore, there seems to be a significant relationship between the firm’s centrality and its worth, described according to an “inverted U” curve, which suggests the existence of optimum values of social prominence in the corporate network.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Board Interlocking; Social Network Analysis in Finance; Company Boards
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance

References

Baum, J.A.C.; Rowley, T.J. & Shipilov, A.V. (2004). The Small World of Canadian Capital Markets: Statistical Mechanics of Investment Bank Syndicate Networks, 1952-1989. Canadian Journal of Administration Sciences. 21:307-325.

Bearden, J.; Atwood, N.; Freitag, P.; Hendricks, C.; Mintz, B. & Schwartz, M. (1975). The nature and extent of bank centrality in corporate network. Working paper, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Department of Sociology.

Bouwman, Christa H.S. (2009). Corporate Governance Propagation through Overlapping Directors Working Paper MIT Sloan School of Management. Available at: http://web.mit.edu/cbouwman/www/downloads/BouwmanCorpGovPropagation.pdf. Accessed on September 30, 2010.

Bunderson, J.S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48:557-591.

Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Chung, K.H. & Pruitt, S.W. (1994). A Simple Approximation of Tobin's Q. Financial Management, 23:70-74.

Cohen, L.; Frazzini, A. & Maloy, C. (2008). The Small World of Investing: Board Connections and Mutual Fund Returns. Journal of Political Economy, 116:951-979.

Cohen, L.; Frazzini, A. & Maloy, C. (2010). Sell-Side School Ties. The Journal of Finance, 65:1409-1437.

Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Conyon, M.J. & Muldoon, M.R. (2006). The Small World of Corporate Boards. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33:1321-1343.

Davis, G.F. & Greve, H.R. (1997). Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980’s. American Journal of Sociology, 103:1-37.

Davis, G.F.; Yoo, M. & Baker, W.E. (2003). The Small World of Corporate Elite, 1982-2001. Strategic Organization, 1:301-326.

Erdös, P. & Rényi, A. (1959). On Random Graphs. Publ. Math. Debrecen. 6:290-297.

Fama, E.F. & Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law Economics, 26:301-325.

Fich, E. & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, p. 689-724.

Fracassi, Cesare, Tate, Geoffrey (2011). External Networking and Internal Firm Governance. Journal of Finance, Forthcoming. Available at: http://www.afajof.org/jouranl/forth_abstract.asp?ref=694. Accessed on September 30, 2011.

Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1:215-239.

Harris, I.C. & Shimizu, K. (2004). Too Busy To Serve? An Examination of the Influence of Overboarded Directors. Journal of Management Studies, 41:775-798.

Haunschild, P. (1993). Interorganizational Imitation: The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquisition Activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38:564-592.

Hsiao, C. (2005). Analysis of Panel Data. NY: Cambridge University Press.

Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa. (2009). Código de Melhores Práticas de Governança Corporativa. Available at: http://www.ibgc.org.br/CodigoMelhoresPraticas.aspx. Accessed on September 30, 2011.

Jackson, M.O. (2008). Social and Economic Networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kilduff, M. (1992). The friendship network as a decision-making resource: Dispositional moderators of social influences on organizational choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62:168-180.

Labianca, G. & Brass, D.J. (2006). Exploring the Social Ledger: Negative Relationships and Negative Asymmetry in Social Networks in Organizations. Academy of Management Review. 31:596-614.

Lazzarini, S.G. (2007). Mudar Tudo Para Não Mudar Nada: Análise da Dinâmica de Redes de Proprietários No Brasil Como ‘Mundos Pequenos’. RAE-Eletrônica, 6.

Leitner, Y. (2005). Financial Networks: Contagion, Commitment, and Private Sector Bailouts, Journal of Finance, vol. 60, n. 6, p. 2925-2953.

Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Liu, J.S. & Yang, C. (2008). Herding of Corporate Directors in Taiwan. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 44:109-123.

Martínez-Jaramillo, S., Pérez, O.P., Embriz, F.A. & Dey, F.L.G. (2010). Systemic risk, financial contagion and financial fragility. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34:2358-2374.

Mehra, A., Kilduff, M. & Brass, D.J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46:121-146.

Mendes-Da-Silva, W., Brito, T., Famá, R., Liljegren, J.T. (2008). Effects of Friendship in Transactions in An Emerging Market: Empirical Evidence From Brazil. Icfai Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5:25-46.

Mendes-Da-Silva, W.; Rossoni, L.; Martin, D.L. & Martelanc, R. (2008). A Influência das Redes de Relações Corporativas no Desempenho das Empresas do Novo Mercado da Bovespa. Revista Brasileira de Finanças, 6:337-358.

Mendes-Da-Silva, Wesley, Vidal, Patrícia (2010). Lost in Space? The Topography of Social Relationship Network of Board Members in The Brazilian Capital Market. In Proceedings from 10th Brazilian Finance Conference, São Paulo.

Merton, R.K. (1996). On social structure and science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Milgram, S. (1967). The Small World Problem. Psychology Today, 2:60-67.

Mills, C.W. (1956). The Power Elite. New York : Oxford.

Mizruchi, M.S. (1996). What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assesment of Research on Interlocking Directors. Annual Rev. of Sociology, 22:271-298.

Moody, J. (2004). The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69:213-238.

Newman, M.E.J.; Strogatz, S.H. & Watts, D.J. (2001). Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Physical Rev. E. 64:026118-1-026118-17.

Petersen, M.A. (2009). Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22:435-480.

Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York : Harper & Row.

Pirson, M. & Turnbull, S. (2011). Toward a More Humanistic Governance Model: Network Governance Structures. Journal of Business Ethics, 99:101-114.

Robins, G. & Alexander, M. (2004). Small Worlds Among Interlocking Directors: Network Structure and Distance in Bipartite Graphs. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 10:69-94.

Santos, R.L. & Silveira, A.D.M. (2007). Board Interlocking no Brasil: A Participação de Conselheiros em Múltiplas Companhias e seu Efeito sobre o Valor das Empresas. Revista Brasileira de Finanças, 5:125-163.

Schonlau, Robert, Singh, Param V. (2009). Board Network and Merger Performance. Tepper School of Business. Paper 449. Available at: http://repository.cmu.edu/tepper/449. Accessed on September 30, 2011.

Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. 2. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Stafsudd, A. (2009). Corporate Networks as Informal Governance Mechanisms: A Small Worlds Approach to Sweden. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 17:62-76.

Subrahmanyam, A. (2008). Social Networks and Corporate Governance. European Financial Management, 14:633-662.

Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Watts, D.J. & Strogatz, S.H. (1998). Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks”. Nature, 393:440-442.

Westlund, H. & Adam, F. (2010). Social Capital and Economic Performance: A Meta-analysis of 65 Studies. European Planning Studies, 18:893-919.

Yang, H.; Lin, Z. & Lin, Y. (2010). A multilevel framework of firm boundaries: Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 31:237-261.

Yermack, D. (1996). Higher evaluation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40:185-211.