Bourjade, Sylvain (2009): The role of private litigation in antitrust enforcement. Published in: Global Competition Litigation Review
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_34818.pdf Download (79kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this article, we study the effects of encouraging private actions for breaches of competition law. We also analyze how to design a private litigation system which deters anticompetitive actions without deterring legitimate pro-competitive actions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The role of private litigation in antitrust enforcement |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Private Antitrust Litigation |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K41 - Litigation Process L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L40 - General |
Item ID: | 34818 |
Depositing User: | Sylvain Bourjade |
Date Deposited: | 18 Nov 2011 15:27 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 16:41 |
References: | Baker, D.I., 2004, “Revisiting History - What Have We Learned About Private Antitrust Enforcement That We Would Recommend to Others?” Loyola Consumer Law Review, 16, pp. 379-408. Baker, S. and Mezzetti, C., 2001, “Prosecutorial Resources, Plea Bargaining and the Decision to go to Trial,” Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 17, pp. 149-167. Bebchuk, L., 1984, “Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information,” Rand Journal of Economics, 15, pp. 404-415. Bourjade, S., Rey, P. and Seabright, P., 2009, "Private Antitrust Enforcement in the Presence of Pre-trial Bargaining," The Journal of Industrial Economics 57(3), pp. 372-409. Demougin, D. and Fluet, C., 2006, “Preponderance of Evidence,” European Economic Review, 50, pp. 963-976. Demougin, D. and Fluet, C., 2008, “Rules of Proof, Courts, and Incentives,” Rand Journal of Economics, 39(1), pp. 20-40. Friedman, E. and Wickelgren, A., 2006, “Bayesian Juries and The Limits to Deterrence,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(1), pp. 70-86. Grossman, G. M. and Katz, M. L., 1983, “Plea Bargaining and Social Welfare,” American Economic Review, 73, pp. 749-757. Hovenkamp, H., 2005, “The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Katz, A.W., 1990, “The Effect of Frivolous Lawsuits on the Settlement of Litigation,” International Review of Law and Economics, 10, pp. 3-27. Perloff J. M. and Rubinfeld D. L., 1987, “Settlements in Private Antitrust Litigation,” Lawrence J. White, ed., Private Antitrust Litigation: New Evidence, New Meaning, Cambridge: MIT Press. Perloff, J. M., Rubinfeld, D. L. and Ruud, P., “Antitrust Settlements and Trial Outcomes,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, pp. 401-409. Posner, R. A., 1999, “An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence,” Stanford Law Review, 51, pp. 1477-1521. Reinganum, J., 1988, “Plea Bargaining and Prosecutorial Discretion,” American Economic Review, 78, pp. 713-728. Reinganum, J. and Wilde, L., 1986, “Settlement, Litigation, and the Allocation of Litigation Costs,” Rand Journal of Economics, 17, pp. 557-568. Schrag, J., and Scotchmer, S., 1994, “Crime and Prejudice: The Use of Character Evidence in Criminal Trials,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations, 10(2), pp. 319-342. Segal, I.R. and Whinston, M.D., 2007, "Public vs. Private Enforcement of Antitrust Law: A Survey," European Competition Law Review, 2007, pp. 323-332. Shavell, S., 1982, “Suit, Settlement and Trial: A Theoretical Analysis under Alternative Methods for the Allocation of Legal Costs,” Journal of Legal Studies, 11, pp. 55-82. Shavell, S., 1984, `Liability for Harm Versus Regulation of Safety,' Journal of Legal Studies, 13, pp. 357-374. Walbroeck, D., Slater, D. and Even-Shoshan, G., 2004, `Study on the conditions of claims for damages in the case of infringement of EC competition rules,' Brussels, Ashurst. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/34818 |