Towards an understanding of the endogenous nature of group identification in games

Smith, John and Bezrukova, Katerina (2012): Towards an understanding of the endogenous nature of group identification in games.

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that identification with a social group is constant throughout the play of a one-shot game in the absence of feedback. We provide evidence which challenges this assumption. We direct subjects to play one of two versions of the prisoner's dilemma game. These versions are distinguished by the relative attractiveness of the uncooperative action. We refer to the version with a relatively attractive uncooperative action as the Easy Game and the other as the Difficult Game. We find that for the subjects who play the Difficult Game, their change in group identification is significantly related to their action selected. No such relationship exists within the Easy Game. Additionally, we find that the change primarily occurs after the action is selected rather than upon inspection of the game. We discuss the implications of our findings to settings both inside and outside of the laboratory.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Group Identification; Experimental Game Theory; Endogenous Preferences; Social Identity; Decision Difficulty
• Subjects: Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z10 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games

References

Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1999). Social identity and social cognition. Blackwell Publishers: Walden MA.

Aguiar, F., Branas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P., & Miller, L. (2010). Personal identity: A theoretical and experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Methodology, 17(3), 261-275.

Ahmed, A. (2007). Group identity, social distance and intergroup bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 324-337.

Ariely, D., & Norton, M. (2008). How actions create-not just reveal-preferences. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 13-16.

Ando, K. (1999). Social identification and a solution to social dilemmas. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 227-235.

Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. (1999). Negotiation processes and outcomes in prosocially and egoistically motivated groups. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(4), 385-402.

Bodner, R., & Prelec, D. (2003). Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. In I. Brocas & J. Carrillo (Eds.), The psychology of economic decisions, Oxford University Press, New York.

Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 75-111.

Branscombe, N., & Wann, D. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657.

Brehm, J. W. (1956). Post-decision changes in the desirability of choice alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384-389.

Brewer, M. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 75-82.

Brewer, M., & Kramer, R. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size and framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 543-549.

Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.

Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286.

Brown, R., & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behavior: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 131-142.

Canegallo, C., Ortona, G., Ottone, S., Ponzaono, F., & Scacciati, F. (2008). Competition versus cooperation: Some experimental evidence. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 18-30.

Carpenter, J. (2005). Endogenous social preferences. Review of Radical Political Economics, 37(1), 63-84.

Charness, G., Rigotti, L., & Rustichini, A. (2007). Individual behavior and group membership. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1340-1352.

Chen, Y., & Li, X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99(1), 431-457.

Dawes, R., Van de Kragt, A., & Orbell, J. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimenal manipulations. Acta Psychologica, 68, 82-97.

Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2005). Managing diversity by creating team identity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58(3), 371-392.

Egan, L., Bloom, P., & Santos, L. (2010). Choice-induced preferences in the absence of choice: Evidence from a blind two choice paradigm with young children and capuchin monkeys. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 204-207.

Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.

Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 203-210.

Gaertner, S., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 239-249.

Garcia, S., Tor, A., Bazerman, M., & Miller, D. (2005): "Profit maximization versus disadvantageous inequality: The impact of self-categorization," Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3), 187-198.

Grieve, P., & Hogg, M. (1999). Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 926-940.

Güth, W., Levati, M., & Ploner, M. (2008). Social identity and trust: An experimental investigation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1293-1308.

Haddock, G., Rothman, A. J., Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Forming judgments of attitude certainty, intensity, and importance: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 771-782.

Hogg, M., Cooper-Shaw, L., & Holzworth, D. (1993). Group prototypicality and depersonalized attraction in small interactive groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 452-465.

Hogg, M., & Grieve, P. (1999). Social identity theory and the crisis of confidence in social psychology: A commentary, and some research on uncertainty reduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 79-93.

Hogg, M., & Hardie, E. (1991). Social attraction, personal attraction and self-categorization: A field study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 175-180.

Hogg, M., & Hardie, E. (1992). Prototypicality, conformity and depersonalized attraction: A Self-Categorization Analysis of Group Cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 41-56.

Ip, G., Chiu, C.Y., & Wan, C. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait- versus goal-based group perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 368-381.

Izuma, K., Matsumoto, M., Murayama, K., Samejima, K., Sadato, N., & Matsumoto, K. (2010). Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(51), 22014-22019.

Kramer, R., & Brewer, M. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 1044-1057.

Liberman, V., Sammuels, S., & Ross, L. (2004). The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1175-1185.

Liberman, N., & Forster, J. (2006). Inferences from decision difficulty. Journal of Experimental Social Psycholgy, 42, 290-301.

McLeish, K., & Oxoby, R. (2007). Identity, cooperation and punishment. Working paper, University of Calgary and IZA.

McLeish, K., & Oxoby, R. (2011). Social Interactions and the Salience of Social Identity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 172-178.

Oakes, P., & Turner J.C. (1980). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 295-301.

Perreault, S., & Bourhis, R. (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 92-103.

Pettigrew, T. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.

Rapoport, A., (1967). A Note on the "Index of Cooperation" for Prisoner's Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11(1), 100-103.

Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. (1965). Prisoner's dilemma: a study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Reid, S., & Hogg, M. (2005). Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 804-817.

Schotter, A., Weiss, A., & Zapater, I. (1996). Fairness and survival in ultimatum and dictatorship Games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, 37-56.

Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.

Sharot, T., De Martino, B., & Dolan, R. (2009). How choice reveals, and shapes, expected hedonic outcome. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(12), 3760-3765.

Sharot, T., Velasquez, C., & Dolan, R. (2010). Do Decisions Shape Preference? Evidence From Blind Choice. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1231-1235.

Shultz, T., & Lepper, M. (1996). Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. Psychological Review, 103(2), 219-240.

Shultz, T., Leveille, E., & Lepper, M. (1999). Free choice and cognitive dissonance revisited: Choosing 'lesser evils' versus 'greater goods'. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 40-48.

Steffel, M. (2009). The impact of choice difficulty on self and social preferences. Unpublished dissertation, Princeton University.

Swann, W., Kwan, V., Polzer, J., & Milton, L. (2003). Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1396-1406.

Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M., & Bundy, R. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, Nelson-Hall, 7-25.

Turner, J. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Malden, MA, Blackwell, 6-34.

Vanbeselaere, N. (1991). The impact of in-group and out-group homogeneity/heterogeneity upon intergroup relations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(3), 291-301.

Vlaev, I., & Chater, N. (2006). Game relativity: How context influences strategic decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 131-149.

Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favourtism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 265-284.

Wit, A., & Wilke, H. (1992). The effect of social categorization on cooperation, in three types of social dilemmas. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 135-151.