Examining the discourse on nuclear weapons

Ghafele, Roya (2000): Examining the discourse on nuclear weapons. Published in: Disarmament Forum No. 2 (2000): pp. 77-87.

Abstract

Nuclear weapons and language - is there a connection? Linguistics is an established science, but what has it got to do with nuclear weapons? This article was inspired by several international disarmament negotiations where I noticed that diplomats work in a communicative reality related to the nuclear arms issue. But is anyone involved in this highly political process aware of the activity of that process of talking? Observations showed that the political problem around the issue of nuclear arms is often, among other things, a communication problem. There is a clear lack of research dealing with communicative aspects of the nuclear arms issue. This article is based on a preliminary empirical case study where officials from seven different countries (Austria, China, France, India, Israel, Japan and South Africa) were interviewed and asked to participate in a short association test. While every country has a particular way of perceiving and dealing with nuclear related issues, these interviews show that language is an essential element in constructing the social reality of nuclear disarmament.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Nuclear Disarmament, Discourse Analysis, Culture, Conference on Disarmament
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F59 - Other; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F51 - International Conflicts ; Negotiations ; Sanctions

References

Robert Vion, La communication verbale: analyse des interactions, Paris, Hachette, 1992, p. 11.

Susan Petrilli, On the Materiality of Signs, Semiotica, Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, No. 62, 1986, pp. 223, 224, 227.

Baard B. Knudsen, The Paramount Importance of Cultural Sources: American Foreign Policy Research Reconsidered, Cooperation and Conflict, Nordic Journal of International Politics, No. 22/2, 1987, p. 82.

Alfred Louis Kroeber and Clyde Kluckhohn, Culture, a Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions, Cambridge, MA, Papers of the Peabody Museum, 1952, p. 181.

Mary Jane Collier and Thomas Milt, Cultural Identity: An Interpretative Work, in: Young Kim and William Gudykunst, Theories in Intercultural Communication, International and Intercultural Communication Annual Vol. XII, London, Sage, 1988, p. 112.

Raymond Cohen, International Communication: An Intercultural Approach, Cooperation and Conflict, Nordic Journal of International Politics, No. 22, 1987, pp. 75, 76.

Karen A. Mingst and Craig P. Warkentin, What Difference Does Culture Make in Multilateral Negotiations? Global Governance. A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, No. 2/2, 1996, pp. 180, 185.

Pertti Joenniemi, Decoding Nuclear Winter: Has War Lost its Name? Current Research on Peace and Violence; War, Peace and Culture, No. 10/1, 1987, p. 24.

Robert B.J. Walker, Culture, Discourse, Insecurity, Current Research on Peace and Violence; War, Peace and Culture, No. 10/1, 1987, p. 52.

Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of knowledge, Paris, Tavistock, 1971;

Pierre Bourdieu, Ce que parler veut dire, l.économie des échanges linguistiques, Paris, Fayard, 1982.