Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation

Spash, Clive L. and Hanley, N (1994): Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation. Published in: Ecological Economics , Vol. 12, No. 3 (1995): pp. 191-208.

Abstract

This paper considers the nature of preferences for the preservation of biodiversity, and the extent to which individuals are well-informed about biodiversity. We present evidence that the elicitation of monetary bids to pay for biodiversity preservation, as required for cost-benefit analysis, fails as a measure of welfare changes due to the prevalence of preferences which neoclassical economics defines as lexicographic. That is, a significant proportion of individuals refuse to make trade-offs which require the substitution of biodiversity for other goods. In addition, we show that understanding of the biodiversity concept is extremely limited, raising concerns over a reliance on stated preferences, as revealed in contingent valuation studies, for decision-making on this issue. Results from two samples (students and the general public) are described.

This is a paper from the Ecological Economics discussion paper series edited by Clive L. Spash and run from Stirling University from 1994 to 1996. This particular paper was later published as (Spash and Hanley, 1995).

Spash, C.L., Hanley, N., 1995. Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation. Ecological Economics vol.12, no.3 pp.191-208.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: biodiversity; forestry; lexicographic preferences; cost-benefit analysis; contingent valuation; environmental ethics; incommensurability; rights; deep ecology
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology

References

Adams, R.M. and Crocker, T.D., 1984. Economically relevant response estimation and the value of information. In T.D. Crocker (editor) Economic Perspectives of Acid Deposition Control. London, Butterworth.

Adamowicz, WL, Bhardwaj, V and MacNab B (1993) "Willingness to pay and willingness to accept compensation". Land Economics, 69 (4), 416-427.

Braden, J. and Kolstad, C., 1991. Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. Amsterdam, Elsevier North-Holland.

Gravelle, H. and Rees, R., 1992. Microeconomics, 2nd Edition. Harlow, Essex, Longmans.

Hanley, N. and Munro, A., 1994 "The effects of information in contingent markets for environmental goods". Discussion papers in Ecological Economics, Economics Department, University of Stirling, no.94/5, 34pp.

Knetsch, J (1990) "Environmental policy implications of the disparity between willingness to pay and compensation demanded". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, 227-237.

Kreps, D., 1990. A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Hemel Hempstead, Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

Malinvaud, E., 1972. Lectures on Microeconomic Theory. Amsterdam, North-holland.

McNeely, J.A., 1988. Economics and Biological Diversity. Gland, Switzerland, IUCN.

Meier, C. and Randall, A., 1991. Use value under uncertainty. Land Economics, 67 (4), 379-389.

Milbraith, L.W., 1984. Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society. New York, State University Press.

Mitchell, R. and Carson, R., 1988. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Washington DC, Resources for the Future.

Naess, A., 1973. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: a summary. Inquiry, 16: 95-100.

Sagoff, M., 1988. The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Sen, A., 1987. The Standard of Living. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Solow, A., Polasky, S. and Broadus, J., 1993. On the measurement of biological diversity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24 (1), 60-68.

Soulé, M.E. and Wilcox, B.A., 1980. Conservation Biology. Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates.

Spash, C.L., 1993a. Estimating the importance of inviolable rights: the case of long-term damages and future generations. Unpublished report to the Scottish Economic Society.

Spash, C.L., 1993b. Economics, ethics and long-term environmental damages. Environmental Ethics, 15 (2), 117-132.

Stevens, T., Echevarria, J., Glass, R., Hager, T. and More, T., 1991. Measuring the existence value of wildlife: what do CVM estimates really show. Land Economics, 67 (4), 390-400.

Varian, H.R., 1984. Microeconomic Analysis, 2nd edition. New York, W.W. Norton.

Willig R (1976) "Consumers' surplus without apology" American Economic Review, 66, 589-597.

Wilson, E., (editor) 1988. Biodiversity. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.

WRI, IUCN, UNEP, 1992. Global Biodiversity Strategy. New York, World Resources Institute.