Powers of inspection of the polish competition authority. question of proportionality

Bernatt, Maciej (2011): Powers of inspection of the polish competition authority. question of proportionality. Published in: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies , Vol. Vol. 2, (2011): pp. 47-66.

Abstract

The principle of proportionality applies to competition proceedings especially, when it comes to the exercise by the competition authority of its powers of inspection. Their use limits the economic freedom and right to privacy of the scrutinised undertakings in order to protect free competition. The use of inspection powers must thus be proportionate and remain the least onerous possible for the inspected companies. In consequence, legislation must provide procedural guarantees of proportionality of inspections. This article analyses whether the powers of inspection bestowed upon the Polish competition authority are regulated in a way that guarantees the observance of the principle of proportionality. The analysis focuses on the powers of control and search. Subsequently covered is also the issue of judicial control over the use of the powers of inspection by the competition authority. Proposals for changes in the practice of the competition authority as well as in the Polish legal framework are made in conclusion.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: competition proceedings; antitrust proceedings; dawn raids; inspection; right to privacy; right of defense; judicial control over the administrative proceedings; procedural fairness
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law

References

Andersson H., Legnerfärt E., ‘Dawn Raids in sector inquiries – fishing expeditions in disguise’ (2008) 29(8) ECLR.

Banasiński C., Piontek E. (eds), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz, [Act on Competition and Consumers Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2009.Bernatt M., ‘The control of Polish courts over the infringements of procedural rules by the national competition authority. Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 19 August 2009 – Marquard Media Polska (No. III SK 5/09)’ (2010) 3(3) YARS.

Garlicki L. (ed.), Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz, t. III [Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Commentary, vol. III], Warszawa 2003.

Janusz R., ‘Dostosowywanie prawa polskiego do prawa wspólnotowego w zakresie instytucji, procedur i sankcji antymonopolowych’ [‘Adjustement of Polish law to EC law in respect with antitrust institutions, procedures and sanctions’] [in:] P. Saganek, T. Skoczny (eds), Wybrane problemy i obszary dostosowania prawa polskiego do prawa Unii Europejskiej [Selected problems and areas of adjustement of Polish law to EU law], Warszawa 1999.

Jones A., Sufrin B., EC Competition Law, Oxford University Press, 2004.

Lenaerts K., J. Vanhamme, ‘Procedural Rights of Private Parties in the Community Administrative Process’ (1997) 34 CMLR.

Modzelewska-Wąchal E., Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz [Act on Competition and Consumers Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2002.

Róziewicz-Ładoń K., Postępowanie przed Prezesem Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów w zakresie przeciwdziałania praktykom ograniczającym konkurencję, [Proceedings before the President of the Office of Competition and Consumers Protection in respect with the practices restricting competition], Warszawa 2011.

Skoczny T., Jurkowska A., Miąsik D. (eds), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów, Komentarz [Act on Competition and Consumers Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2009.

Stawicki A., Stawicki E. (eds), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz [Act on Competition and Consumers Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2011.

Whish R., Competition Law, 6th ed., Lexis Nexis, London 2009.

Wojtyczek K., ‘Zasada proporcjonalności’ [‘Principle of proportionality’], [in:] B. Banaszak, A. Preisner (eds), Prawa i wolności obywatelskie w Konstytucji RP [Civil rights and freedoms in the Constitution of the Republic of Poland], Warszawa 2002.