Polish antitrust experience with hub-and-spoke conspiracies

Bolecki, Antoni (2011): Polish antitrust experience with hub-and-spoke conspiracies. Published in: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies , Vol. Vol. 2, (2011): pp. 25-46.

Abstract

A hub-and-spoke conspiracy involves an exchange of confidential information primarily concerning future prices. The exchange takes place generally between competing distributors via a common supplier but a reverse relationship is also possible. The essence of hub-and-spoke lies in the fact that there is no direct contact between competitors – the party guaranteeing the information flow is normally the common supplier (distributor in a reverse scenario). A hub-and-spoke conspiracy was first identified and specifically described by the British Office of Fair Trade in 2003. There are currently several pending investigations concerning hub-and-spoke practices in a number of EU Member States including Germany, France, Italy and the UK. Three cases of that type have been so far assessed in the Polish antitrust practice: Polifarb Cieszyn Wrocław (2007), Tikurilla (2010) and Akzo Nobel (2010). The main objective of this article is the reconstruction of hub-and-spoke conduct in Poland. Commented will also be issues such as: the connection between hub-and-spoke practices and ‘classic’ retail price maintenance; standard of proof, and duration of the agreements.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: hub-and-spoke; AtoBtoC coordination; exchange of information; vertical restraints; RPM; horizontal effect; standard of proof; duration of an agreement; initiator
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law

References

Albors-Llorens A., ‘Horizontal agreements and concerted practices in EC competition law: Unlawful and legitimate Contacts between Competitors’ (2006) 51 Antitrust Bulletin.

Bellamy & Child, European Community Law of Competition, Sixth Edition, Oxford 2008.

Bolecki A., ‘Current Developments in Poland’ (2009) 5(3) European Competition Journal.

Giovannetti E., Stallibrass D., ‘Three Cases in Search of a Theory: Resale Price Maintenance in the UK’ (2009) 5(3) European Competition Journal.

Hay G. A., ‘Horizontal Agreements: Concept and Proof’ (2006) 51 Antitrust Bulletin. Information Exchanges between Competitors under Competition Law, OECD, 2010, (available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/52/48379006.pdf).

Jones A., Sufrin B., EC Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Third Edition, Oxford 2008.

Kohutek K., Sieradzka M., Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów, Komentarz [Act on Competition and Consumer Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2008.

Miąsik D., Reguła rozsądku w prawie antymonopolowym. Studium prawnoporównawcze [Rule of reason in antitrust law. Comparatory study], Kraków 2004.

Piasecki K., System dowodów i postępowanie dowodowe w sprawach cywilnych [System of evidence and hearing of evidence in civil cases], Warszawa 2010.

Skoczny T., Jurkowska A., Miąsik D. (eds), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz [Act on Competition and Consumer Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2009.

Whelan P., ‘Trading negotiations between retailers and suppliers: a fertile ground for anti-competitive horizontal information exchange?’ (2009) 5(3) European Competition Journal.

Wollmann H., ‘Category Management, Private Labels und Informationsaustausch zwischen Wettbewerbern’ (2011) 1 Ecolex – Fachzeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsrecht.