Examining Theories of Growth & Development & Policy Response Based on Them from Islamic Perspective

Shaikh, Salman (2012): Examining Theories of Growth & Development & Policy Response Based on Them from Islamic Perspective. Published in: Journal of Islamic Banking & Finance , Vol. Volume, No. Issue 2 (31 April 2012)

Abstract

Poverty and inequality around the world has been rising over the last three decades and the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) seems a far fetched goal. In explaining underdevelopment, Classical Economics has offered many theories and models including but not limited to Rostow’s Stages of Growth Theory, Harrod-Domar Model, Solow’s Growth Model, Dependency Theory, Lewis Two Sector Model, Neo-colonial Dependence Model, False-Paradigm Model, and Dualistic-Development Thesis etc. This study analyzes the theories of development proposed in classical literature in the light of Islamic Economics and investigates whether policy response influenced by some of these theories had been effective or not in selected countries and regions. In light of recent developments in growth literature, the last section of the paper also analyzes whether Islamic economics principles have the capacity to ensure that determinants of growth suggested by ‘new growth theory’ will exist in an Islamic economy and together with these, do Islamic economic principles have other distinctive mechanisms and institutions that can help in the development process.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Interest free economy, Public finance, Taxation, Inequality, Income redistribution, Islamic economic system, fiscal policy, deficit financing
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L38 - Public Policy; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, & James A. Robinson (2001). “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review, 91(5): 1369–1401.

Africa Action (2008) - http://www.africaaction.org/campaign_new/debt.php

Anwar, Talat (1996) Structural Adjustment and Poverty: The Case of Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review 35: 4 Part II (Winter 1996) pp. 911—926

Brown, Mark Malloch (2002). UNDP Administrator, Address at Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Chang, Ha-Joon (2006). Understanding the Relationship between Institutions and Economic Development: Some Key Theoretical Issues. World Institute for Development Economics Research. Discussion Paper No. 2006/05

Dawn, Karachi (April 12, 2010). “The Irrelevance of Monetary Policy”. Economics & Business Review. Dr. Javed Akber Ansari. p. V1.

Habisso, Tesfaye (2009). Africa and the Failure of Development Aid: Time for Designing an Exit Strategy. EPRDF-SF.

Haq, M. (1963) The Strategy of Economic Planning: A Case Study of Pakistan, Oxford University Press: Karachi.

Haq, M. (1995) Reflections on Human Development: How the focus of development economics shifted from national income accounting to people-centered policies, told by one of the chief architects of the new paradigm, Oxford University Press: New York.

Klien, Naomi (2007). The Shock Doctrine. Metropolitan Books: New York

Levinsohn, Jim (2002). The World Bank's Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Approach: Good Marketing or Good Policy. Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, Department of Economics.

McCord et al. (2005). Understanding African Poverty: Beyond the Washington Consensus to the millennium Development Goals Approach. Paper presented at Africa in the World Economy – The National Regional and International Challenges Fondad, The Hague, December 2005, www.fondad.org

Perkins, John (2004). Confessions of an Economic Hitman. Koehler Publishers. INC: San Francisco

Rodrik, Dani (2010). Diagnostics before Prescription. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol 24, No. 3, Pg. 33 – 44.

Rodrik, Dani (2006). Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. XLIV (December 2006), pp. 973–987.

Stiglitz (2004). From the Washington Consensus towards a new Global Governance. Presented at conference in Barcelona sponsored by Foundation CIDOB and the Initiative for Policy Dialogue.

United Nations (2005). “United Nations Development Indicators”. United Nations Development Research Group.

United Nations (2008). “United Nations Development Indicators”. United Nations Development Research Group.

Woo, W. Thye (2004). Some Fundamental Inadequacies of the Washington Consensus: Misunderstanding the Poor by the Brightest. Hong Kong Institute of Economics and Business Strategy the University of Hong Kong.

Zaidi, Akber (2005). “Issues in Pakistan’s Economy”. Karachi: Oxford University Press.