The role of IPR on maize output in Zimbabwe

Chiwenga, Emson F (2010): The role of IPR on maize output in Zimbabwe.

Abstract

This paper seeks to ascertain the role of intellectual property rights (IPR) on Zimbabwe’s maize output. Specific focus is given to the role of article 27 of the Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement as well as the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) in influencing maize output in Zimbabwe. While there has been an appreciation of IPR legislation attracting investments, the Zimbabwean government has found no need of revisiting some of this legislation. This is demonstrated by how some of the pieces of legislation have been left idle for long periods of time. From theory, the availability and supply of maize seed influence farmer’s production decisions, which in turn reflect total output of maize. However output data of maize production for the period 1994 to 2008 seem not to support this assertion. The need for a grassroots founded framework model on intellectual property rights in maize production is long overdue for the country. Such a framework allows for a general direction that enables appropriate policies to be established in addressing challenges embedded within the current scenario. In the interest of local communities, it is necessary that indigenous farm knowledge and processes be protected as well.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Intellectual property rights, Maize production, TRIPS, Biological Diversity,Zimbabwe,developing and least developed countries
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights

References

ActionAid, 2003. Trade related intellectual property rights AEFJN, 2002.

Action plan 2002.Equitable protection for intellectual property in Africa;

Andreanne Léger, 2005. Intellectual property rights and their impacts in developing countries:An empirical analysis of maize breeding in Mexico.

Archana Jatkar, 2008. Doha round negotiations on TRIPS: The state of play. CUTS CITTEE.

Blakeney Michael, 2001. Access to genetic resources, gene-based invention and Agriculture.

CBD.IUCN,Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge UK and ICTSD Geneva , Switzerland.

Chetsanga, Christopher J. 2000. Zimbabwe: Exploitation of biotechnology in Agriculture research.

CIAT, CRS, World Vision, Care, Agritex & CIMMYT (2009).Seed system security assessmentin Zimbabwe. A study funded by the US Agency for international development office of foreign disaster assistance in July 2009 Rome.International center for tropical agriculture.

CIMMYT, 2000. World maize facts aid trends: meeting world maize needs: Technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector.

Commission on intellectual property rights (2003).Integrating intellectual property rights and development policy. 3rd Edition.

Correa Carlos, Quaker, 2000. IPR and developing countries. Eicher . Carl K., 2000. NGOs and the African farmer: A skeptical view.

Enock Shumba, 2003. Zimbabwe biodiversity strategy and action plan.

FAO 2009. FAOSTAS Database on maize production. Frederick M. Abbot, 2008. Post-mortem of the Geneva Ministerial: Where does TRIP go from here?

Gadzirayi C.T, E Mutandwa, S. Chitsa, 2006. An assessment on the use of open pollinated maize varieties among smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe.

Gaisford J.D & Richardson R,S (2000). The TRIPS agreement: Should GATT tradition have been abandoned? Estey Centre journal of international law and trade policy. 137-69.

Geertrui Van Overwalle, 1999. Patents in Agricultural biotechnology and the right to food.

Government of Zimbabwe 1974. Plant breeders’ Rights act (18.16)

Government of Zimbabwe 2001. Patents amendment bill, 2001 GRAIN, 1999. Plant variety protection to feed Africa? Rhetoric versus reality.

Hansen, Stephen, and VanFlleet, 2003. Traditional knowledge and intellectual property: A handbook on issues and options of traditional knowledge holders in protecting their property and maintaining biological diversity.

Kuyek Devlin 1999. Intellectual property rights in African Agriculture: Implication for small farmers.

Maskus Eugene, 2000. Intellectual property in the global economy.

Ncube Caroline, 2002. Protecting business methods in South Africa and Zimbabwe.

Panagaria A, 1999. TRIPS and the WTO: An uneasy marriage. Paper presented at the World Trade Organization, July 20th 1999.

Rashid M Hassan, Mulugetta Mekuria and Wilfred Mwangi, 2001. Maize breeding research in Eastern and Southern Africa: Current status and Impact of past and future investments by public and private sector, 1966-1997, Mexico, D.F: CIMMYT.

Ratnakar Adhikari, 2005. Emerging issues relating to conflicts between TRIPS and Biodiversity:Development implications for south Asia.

SADC Seed update, 2003. Intellectual property rights and seed trade; monthly. An electronic publication number 5.

Sherhood R.M (1997). Intellectual property systems and investment stimulation: The rating of systems in eighteen developing countries. IDEA. The J. Law and Technology: 261-361

Tansey G, 2004. Global Intellectual property rights. Thorpe Phil, 2002. Implementation of the TRIPS agreement by developing countries.

WIPO. 2010. Patent related flexibilities in the multilateral legal framework and their legislative implementation at the national and regional levels.

World Bank, 2000. Indigenous knowledge and intellectual property rights.

WTO, 2006. Review of the provisions of Article 27.3(b): Summary of issues raised and points made.

Zerbe Noah 2003. Contested Ownership: TRIPS, CBD & Implications for Southern Africa Biodiversity.