Alvi, Mohsin (2012): Attitude Differentiates The Brand Selection (From the view of Generation Y people).
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_39592.pdf Download (650kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Abstract: Attitude makes perception about anything, yes it cannot be neglected that in order to make some attitude towards specific brand; previous performance, good word of mouth or suggestion from other, attractive advertising and highly spend on promotional tools are play a vital role. Positive attitude and negative attitude influence a consumer in brand selection but a problem arises, some people also have a positive attitude but they do not buy brand. It was observed that some of people compromise with their family brand. A research was based on to find the relation of that positive and negative attitude toward selection of brand. 240 observations have been taken randomly through questionnaire and taken them into consideration and applied categorical regression or optimal scaling. It was found that generation y people mostly go for their prefer brands rather than compromise with their family brands.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Attitude Differentiates The Brand Selection (From the view of Generation Y people) |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Positive Attitude, Negative attitude, Brand selection, Generation Y, Categorical regression |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C01 - Econometrics |
Item ID: | 39592 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Mohsin Hassan Alvi |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jun 2012 19:42 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 15:01 |
References: | Bass F. M. & Talarzyk W. W. (1972). An attitude model for the study of brand preferences, Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (1), 93-96 Bearden W. O. & Etzel M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions, Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (2), 183-194 Biehal G., Stephens D. & Curlo E. (1992), Attitude toward the ad and brand choice, Journal of Advertising, 21 (30), 19-36 Bonfield E. H. (1974), Attitude, social influence, personal norm, and intention interactions as related to brand purchase behavior, Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (4), 379-389 Ginter J. L. (1974), An experimental investigation of attitude change and choice of a new brand, Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (1), 30-40 Grubb E. L. & Hubb G. (1986), Perception of self, generalized, stereotype, and brand selection, Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (1), 58-63 Haley R. I. & Case P. B. (1979). Testing thirteen attitude scales for agreement and brand discrimination, Journal of Marketing, 43 (4), 20-32 Hasan S. A., Subhani M. I., Osman A. & Alvi M. H., (2012). What affects the most to the recall and recognition of brand symbols?, Archives Des Sciences, 65 (4) Heeler R. M., Okechuku C. & Reid S. (1979), Attribute importance: contrasting measurements, Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (1), 60-63 Kokkinaki F. & Lunt P. (1999), The effect of advertising message involvement on brand attitude accessibility, Journal of Economic Psychology, 20 (1), 41-51 Miller K. E. & Ginter J. L. (1979). An investigation of situational variation in brand choice behavior and attitude, Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (1), 111-123 Spears N. & Singh S. N. (2004), Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising,(26) 2, 53-66 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/39592 |