Klinge Jacobsen, Henrik and Hansen, Lise-Lotte P and Schröder, Sascha T and Kitzing, Lena (2012): Cooperation mechanisms to achieve EU renewable targets.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_41400.pdf Download (222kB) | Preview |
Abstract
There are considerable benefits from cooperating among member states on meeting the 2020 RES targets. Today countries are supporting investments in renewable energy by many different types of support schemes and with different levels of support. The EU has opened for cooperation mechanisms such as joint support schemes for promoting renewable energy to meet the 2020 targets. The potential coordination benefits, with more efficient localisation and composition of renewable investment, can be achieved by creating new areas/sub-segments of renewable technologies where support costs are shared and credits are transferred between countries. Countries that are not coordinating support for renewable energy might induce inefficient investment in new capacity that would have been more beneficial elsewhere and still have provided the same contribution to meeting the 2020 RES targets. Furthermore, countries might find themselves competing for investment in a market with limited capital available. In both cases, the cost-efficiency of the renewable support policies is reduced compared to a coordinated solution. Barriers for joint support such as network regulation regarding connection of new capacity to the electricity grid and cost sharing rules for electricity transmission expansion are examined and solutions are suggested. The influence of additional renewable capacity on domestic/regional power market prices can be a barrier. The market will be influenced by for example an expansion of the wind capacity resulting in lower prices, which will affect existing conventional producers. This development will be opposed by conventional producers whereas consumers will support such a strategy. A major barrier is the timing of RES targets and the uncertainty regarding future targets. We illustrate the importance of different assumptions on future targets and the implied value of RES credits. The effect on the credit price for 2020 is presented in an exemplary case study of 200MW wind capacity.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Cooperation mechanisms to achieve EU renewable targets |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | RES target; cooperation mechanisms; policy coordination; renewables; European energy policy |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q20 - General |
Item ID: | 41400 |
Depositing User: | Henrik Klinge Jacobsen |
Date Deposited: | 24 Sep 2012 23:23 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 17:59 |
References: | [1] A. Tolon-Becerra, X. Lastra-Bravo, F. Bienvenido-Barcena, Proposal for territorial distribution of the EU 2020 political renewable energy goal, Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 2067-2077. [2] Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. L 140/16. [3] S.T. Schröder, L. Kitzing, H. Klinge Jacobsen, L.L. Pade Hansen, Joint Support and Efficient Offshore Investment: Market and Transmission Connection Barriers and Solutions, Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review, 2 (2012) 112-120. [4] C. Klessmann, P. Lamers, M. Ragwitz, G. Resch, Design options for cooperation mechanisms under the new European renewable energy directive, Energy Policy 38 (2010) 4679-4691. [5] M.J. Bürer and R. Wüstenhagen, Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalits’s best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international cleantech investors, Energy Policy 37 (2009) 4997-5005. [6] P.D. Lund, Boosting new renewable technologies towards grid parity – Economic and Policy aspects, Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 2776-2784 [7] U. Lehr, J. Nitsch, M. Kratzat, C. Lutz, D. Edler, Renewable energy and employment in Germany, Energy Policy 36 (2008) 108-117. [8] B.V. Mathiesen, H. Lund, K. Karlsson, 100% Renewable energy systems, climate mitigation and economic growth, Applied Energy 88 (2011) 488-501. [9] M.I. Blanco and G. Rodrigues, Direct employment in the wind energy sector: An EU study, Energy Policy 37 (2009) 2847-2857. [10] B. Hillebrand, H.G. Buttermann, J.M. Behringer, M. Bleuel, The expansion of renewable energies and employment effects in Germany, Energy Policy 34 (2006) 3484-3494. [11] N. Hanley and C. Nevin, Appraising renewable energy developments in the remote communities: the case of the North Assynt Estate, Scotland, Energy Policy 27 (1999) 527-547. [12] C. Klessmann, The evolution of flexibility mechanisms for achieving European renewable energy targets 2020- ex-ante evaluation of the principle mechanisms, Energy Policy 37 (2009) 4966-4979. [13] L.L. Pade, H. Klinge Jacobsen, Barriers and Critical Success Factors for the Implementation of Cooperation Mechanisms., RES4Less Deliverable 3.1, 2012, http://www.res4less.eu/files/deliverables/RES4LESS_D3%201_Barriers%20and%20Critical%20Success%20Factors%20for%20the%20Implementation%20of%20Cooperation.pdf [14] R. Haas, C. Panzer, G. Resch, M. Ragwitz, G. Reece, A. Held, A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1003-1034. [15] S. Ropenus, H. Klinge Jacobsen, S.T. Schröder, Network Regulation and Support Schemes: How Policy Interactions Affect the Integration of Distributed Generation, Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 1949-1956. [16] H. Klinge Jacobsen S.T. Schröder, Curtailment of renewable generation: Economic optimality and incentives, Energy Policy 49 (2012) 663-675. [17] K. Neuhoff, R. Boyd, Options for Europe: EU Power Market Design to Enable Off-shore Grid. Note addressed at the European Coordinator Mr. Adamowitsch. Climate Policy Initiative, 2010, Berlin. [18] S.T. Schröder, Interconnector capacity allocation in offshore grids with variable wind generation, Wind Energy (in press), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/we.537. [19] O.A. Woolley, Overcoming legal challenges for offshore electricity grid development: a case study of the Cobra and Kriegers Flak projects, in: M.M. Roggenkamp, O.A. Woolley (Eds.), European Energy Law Report IX, Intersentia, Antwerp, 2012, pp. 169-198. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/41400 |