Outsourcing versus technology transfer: Hotelling meets Stackelberg

Pierce, Andrea and Sen, Debapriya (2009): Outsourcing versus technology transfer: Hotelling meets Stackelberg.

Abstract

We consider a Hotelling duopoly with two firms A and B in the final good market. Both can produce the required intermediate good, firm B having a lower cost due to a superior technology. We compare two contracts: outsourcing (A orders the intermediate good from B) and technology transfer (B transfers its technology to A). An outsourcing order is equivalent to building an endogenous capacity and it generates a Stackelberg leadership effect for firm A which is absent in technology transfer. We show that compared to the situation of no contracts there are always Pareto improving outsourcing contracts (making both firms better off and all consumers at least weakly better off), but no Pareto improving technology transfer contracts. It is also shown that if firm B has a relatively large bargaining power in its negotiations with A, then both firms prefer technology transfer while all consumers prefer outsourcing.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Outsourcing; Technology transfer; Hotelling duopoly; Endogenous capacity; Stackelberg effect; Pareto improving contracts
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure ; Size Distribution of Firms; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection

References

Amiti, M., Wei, S.-J. 2005. Fear of service outsourcing: Is it justified? Economic Policy, 42, 307-339.

Amiti, M., Wei, S.-J. 2009. Service offshoring and productivity: Evidence from the US. The World Economy, 32, 203-220.

Anderson, S.P., de Palma, A., Thisse, J-F. 1992. Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Arya, A., Mittendorf, B., Sappington, D. 2008. Outsourcing, vertical integration, and price vs. quantity competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, 1-16.

Baake, P., Oechssler, J., Schenk, C., 1999. Explaining cross-supplies. Journal of Economics, 70, 37-60.

Boccard, N., Wauthy, X. 2005. Equilibrium payoffs in a Bertrand-Edgeworth model with product differentiation. Economics Bulletin, 12, 1-8.

Branstetter, L.G., Fisman, R., Foley, C.F. 2006. Do Stronger Intellectual Property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U.S. firm-level panel data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 321-349

Chen, Y., Dubey, P., Sen, D. 2011. Outsourcing induced by strategic competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29, 484-492.

Chen, Y., Ishikawa, J., Yu, Z., 2004. Trade liberalization and strategic outsourcing. Journal of International Economics, 63, 419-436.

Domberger, S., 1998. The Contracting Organization: A Strategic Guide to Outsourcing. Oxford University Press.

Egger, P., Stehrer, R. 2003. International outsourcing and the skill-specific wage bill in Eastern Europe. The World Economy, 26, 61-72.

Gabszewicz, J.J., Thisse, J-F. 1992. Location. In: Aumann, R.J. & Hart, S. (Eds), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Vol. 1, North Holland, Amsterdam.

Hummels, D., J. Ishii, J., Yi, K.-M. 2001. The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of International Economics, 54, 75-96.

Jarillo, J.C., 1993. Strategic Networks: Creating Borderless Organization. Butterworth-Heinmann.

Kreps, D.M., Scheinkman, J.A. 1983. Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 326-333.

Matsumura, T., Matsushima, N. 2009. Cost differentials and mixed strategy equilibria in a Hotelling model. Annals of Regional Sciences, 43, 215-234.

Matsumura T., Matsushima N., Stamatopoulos, G. 2010 Location equilibrium with asymmetric firms: the role of licensing. Journal of Economics, 99, 267-276.

Mendi, P. 2005. The structure of payments in technology transfer contracts: evidence from Spain. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 14, 403-429.

Nagaoka, S. 2005. Determinants of high-royalty contracts and the impact of stronger protection of intellectual property rights in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 19, 233-254.

Nickerson, J.A., Vanden Bergh, R. 1999. Economizing in a context of strategizing: governance mode choice in Cournot competition. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 40, 1-15.

Riordan, M., Williamson, O.E., 1985. Asset specificity and economic organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3, 365-378.

Robinson, M., Kalakota, R. 2004. Offshore Outsourcing: Business Models, ROI and Best Practices, Mivar Press, Inc.

Shy, O., Stenbacka, R., 2003. Strategic outsourcing. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50, 203-224.

Vagadia, B. 2007. Outsourcing to India-A Legal Handbook, Springer.

Vidal, C.J., Goetschalckx M. 1997. Strategic production-distribution models: a critical review with emphasis on global supply chain models. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 1-18.

Wakasugi, R., Ito, B. 2009. The effects of stronger intellectual property rights on technology transfer: evidence from Japanese firm-level data. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 145-158.

Wauthy, X. 1996. Capacity constraints may restore the existence of an equilibrium in the Hotelling model. Journal of Economics, 64, 315-324.

Williamson, O.E. 2002. The theory of the firm as governance structure: from choice to contract. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 171-195.