Reference Point Adaptation: Tests in the Domain of Security Trading

Arkes, Hal and Hirshleifer, David and Jiang, Danling and Lim, Sonya (2006): Reference Point Adaptation: Tests in the Domain of Security Trading. Forthcoming in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2007)

Abstract

According to prospect theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979), gains and losses are measured from current wealth, which serves as a reference point. We attempted to ascertain to what extent the reference point shifts following gains or losses. In questionnaire studies we asked subjects what stock price today will generate the same utility as a previous change in a stock price. From participants’ responses we calculated the magnitude of reference point adaptation, which was significantly greater following a gain than following a loss of equivalent size. We also found the asymmetric adaptation of gains and losses persisted when a stock was included within a portfolio rather than being considered individually. In studies using financial incentives within the Becker, DeGroot, and Marschak (1964) procedure, we again noted faster adaptation of the reference point to gains than losses. We related our findings to several aspects of asset pricing and investor behavior.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Prospect theory; reference point; asset pricing; security trading
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior

References

Ariely, D., & Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psychological Science, 13, 219-224. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140. Barberis, N., Huang, M. (2001). Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1247-1292. Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1-53. Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9(3), 226-232. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917-927. Camerer, C., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor production. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7-42. Chen, H., & Rao, A. (2002). Close encounters of two kinds: False alarms and dashed hopes. Marketing Science, 21(2),178-196. Coombs, C. H., & Avrunin, G. S. (1977). Single-peaked functions and the theory of preference. Psychological Review, 84, 216-230. Dhar, R., & Zhu, N. (in press). Up close and personal: An individual level analysis of the disposition effect. Management Science. Genesove, D., & Mayer, C. (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1233-1260. Gneezy, U. (2002). Updating the reference point: Experimental evidence. Working paper, which can be obtained from the author at The University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business, 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago IL, 60637. Grinblatt, M., & Han, B. (2005). Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 311-339. Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2001). What makes investors trade. Journal of Finance, 56, 589-616. Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79-109. Hirst, D. E., Joyce, E. J., & Schadewald, M. S. (1994). Mental accounting and outcome contiguity in consumer-borrowing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 136-152. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 263–292. Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, G., & Seppi, D. (2005). The “Ostrich Effect”: Selective attention to information about investments. Working paper, which can be obtained from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=772125. Koszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2004). A model of reference-dependent preferences. Working paper, which can be obtained from http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/botond/refdep.pdf. Lim, S. (2006). Do investors integrate losses and segregate gains? Mental accounting and investor trading decisions, Journal of Business, 79 (5), 2539-2573. Linville, P. W., & Fischer, G. W. (1991). Preferences for separating or combining events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 5-23. Loewenstein, G. F., & Schkade, G. (1999). Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 85-105). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53, 1775–1798. Prelec, D., &Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4-28. Scitovsky, T. (1976). The joyless economy: An inquiry into human satisfaction and consumer dissatisfaction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 40, 777–790. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill Spranca, M., Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 76-105. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1987). Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 39-78. Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60. Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199–214. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183–206. Thaler, R. H. & Johnson E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36, 643–660. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323. Weber, M, & Camerer, C. F. (1998). The disposition effect in securities trading: an experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 33, 167-184. Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17, 317-337. Yogo, M. (2005). Asset prices under rising aspirations and reference-dependent preferences. Working paper, which can be obtained from http://finance.wharton.upenn.edu/~yogo/papers/unpublished/Habit060105.pdf.