Why Post Keynesianism is not yet a science

Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2012): Why Post Keynesianism is not yet a science.

Abstract

In a programmatic article Alfred Eichner explained, from a Post Keynesian perspective, why neoclassical economics is not yet a science. This was some time ago and one would expect that Post Keynesianism, with a heightened awareness of scientific standards, has done much better than alternative approaches in the meantime. There is wide agreement that this is not the case. Explanations, though, differ widely. The present – strictly formal – inquiry identifies an elementary logical flaw. This strengthens the argument that the Post Keynesian motto ‘it is better to be roughly right than precisely wrong!’ is methodologically indefensible.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: new framework of concepts; structure-centric; axiom set; consistency; Post Keynesian hard core; logical rigor; loose verbal reasoning; hypothetico-deductive method; profit; retained profit; saving; general complementarity; IS-fallacy
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B22 - Macroeconomics; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology

References

Allais, M. (1993). Les Fondements Comptable de la Macro-Économie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Boland, L. A. (2003). The Foundations of Economic Method. London, New York: Routledge.

Boylan, T. A., & O'Gorman, P. F. (2007). Axiomatization and Formalism in Economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21, pp. 426-446.

Coates, J. (2007). The Claims of Common Sense. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Coddington, A. (1976). Keynesian Economics: The Search for First Principles. Journal of Economic Literature, 14, pp. 1258-1273.

Colander, D. (1995). Marshallian General Equilibrium Analysis. Eastern Economic Journal, 21, pp. 281-293.

Davidson, P. (1984). Reviving Keynes's Revolution. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 6, pp. 561-575.

Davidson, P. (2010). Keynes's Revolutionary and "Serious" Monetary Theory. In R. W. Dimand, R. A. Mundell, & A. Vercelli (Eds.), Keynes's General Theory after Seventy Years (pp. 241-267). Houndmills, Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Davidson, P. (2011). Post Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Dennis, K. (1982). Economic Theory and the Problem of Translation (I). Journal of Economic Issues, 16, pp. 691-712.

Desai, M. (2008). Profit and Profit Theory. (S. N. Durlauf, & L. E. Blume, Eds.) Retrieved 08 05, 2012, from The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online: http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_P000213

Dillard, D. (2010). The Theory of a Monetary Economy. In K. K. Kurihara (Ed.), Post Keynesian Economics (pp. 3-30). London, New York: Routledge.

Dimand, R. W. (2010). What Keynesian Revolution? A Reconsideration Seventy Years after the General Theory. In R. W. Dimand, R. A. Mundell, & A. Vercelli (Eds.), Keynes's General Theory after Seventy Years (pp. 287-311). Houndmills, Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dow, S. C. (2005). Axioms and Babylonian Thought: A Reply. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27, pp. 385-391.

Eichner, A. S. (1983). Why Economics is Not Yet a Science. In A. S. Eichner (Ed.), Why Economics is Not Yet a Science (pp. 205-241). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Eichner, A. S., & Kregel, J. A. (1975). An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 13, pp. 1293-1314.

Eisner, R. (1995). US National Saving and Budget Deficits. In G. A. Epstein, & H. M. Gintis (Eds.), Macroeconomic Policy After the Conservative Era (pp. 109-142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gerschenkron, A. (1969). History of Economic Doctrines and Economic History. American Economic Review, 59, pp. 1-17.

Godley, W., & Lavoie, M. (2007). Monetary Economics. Houndmills, Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gordon, D. M. (1995). Putting the Horse (Back) Before the Cart: Disentangling the Macro Relationship between Investment and Saving. In G. A. Epstein, & H. M. Gintis (Eds.), Marcoeconomic Policy After the Conservative Era (pp. 57-108). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

Hahn, F. H. (1982). Money and Inflation. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hahn, F. H. (1984). Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Heilbroner, R. L. (1942). Saving and Investments: Dynamic Aspects. American Economic Review, 32, pp. 827-828.

Hicks, J. R. (1939). Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hudík, M. (2011). Why Economics is Not a Science of Behaviour. Journal of Economic Methodology, 18, pp. 147-162.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011a). Primary and Secondary Markets. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1917012, pp. 1-26.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011b). Reconstructing the Quantity Theory (II). SSRN Working Paper Series, 1903663, pp. 1-19.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011c). Squaring the Investment Cycle. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1911796, pp. 1-25.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011d). The Emergence of Profit and Interest in the Monetary Circuit. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1973952, pp. 1-15.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011e). The Propensity Function as General Formalization of Economic Man/Woman. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1942202, pp. 1-28.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2012). The Common Error of Common Sense: An Essential Rectification of the Accounting Approach. SSRN Working Paper Series, 2124415, pp. 1-21.

Kalecki, M. (1987). Bestimmungsgrößen der Profite. In Krise und Prosperität im Kapitalismus (pp. 133-147). Marburg: Metropolis.

Keynes, J. M. (1971). A Treatise on Money. The Pure Theory of Money. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Keynes, J. M. (1973). The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

King, J. E. (2002). A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Klant, J. J. (1984). The Rules of the Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Klant, J. J. (1988). The Natural Order. In N. d. Marchi (Ed.), The Popperian Legacy in Economics (pp. 87-117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Laidler, D. (1999). Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lavoie, M. (1992). Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Lerner, A. P. (1938). Saving Equals Investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52, pp. 297-309.

Lutz, F. A. (1938). The Outcome of the Saving-Investment-Discussion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52, pp. 588-614.

Minsky, H. P. (2008). Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New York, Chicago, San Francisco: McGraw Hill.

Moggridge, D. E. (1976). Keynes. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Myrdal, G. (1939). Monetary Equilibrium. London, Edinburgh, Glasgow: William Hodge.

O'Donnell, R. (1997). Keynes and Formalism. In G. C. Harcourt, & P. A. Riach (Eds.), A 'Second Edition' of The General Theory (pp. 131-165). Oxon: Routledge.

Ohlin, B. (1937). Some Notes on the Stockholm Theory of Savings and Investment (I). Economic Journal, 47, pp. 53-69. Robinson, J. (1956). The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan.

Rosenberg, A. (1980). Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rotheim, R. J. (1981). Keynes' Monetary Theory of Value (1933). Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 3, pp. 568-585.

Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (1998). Economics (16th ed.). Boston, Burr Ridge, etc.: Irwin, McGraw-Hill.

Stigum, B. P. (1991). Toward a Formal Science of Economics: The Axiomatic Method in Economics and Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tómasson, G., & Bezemer, D. J. (2010). What is the Source of Profit and Interest? A Classical Conundrum Reconsidered. MPRA Paper, 20557, pp. 1-34.