Is the impact of AGOA heterogeneous?

Cooke, Edgar F. A. (2012): Is the impact of AGOA heterogeneous?

Abstract

The literature reports the mean impact of trade preferences. The literature on the agoa impact is no exception. The mean impact can be sensitive to heterogeneity in the adoption of preferences by recipients. Nonetheless, the choice of countries included in the sample can play a role in determining the level of the impact. A small increase at the bottom of the distribution is more likely to present a large impact (in percentage terms) compared to the top 20\% -- 5\%. In this paper, we investigate the gains to developing countries focusing on where they lie on the export distribution. This way, heterogeneity can be controlled for and the impact at various percentiles of the distribution can be estimated. We carry out a quantile regression on a sample of countries selected by matching countries on an estimated propensity score as well as the full sample for comparison. Secondly, we decompose the impact using methodology in the spirit of the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition found in Machado and Mata (2005) for quantile regressions. We find that gains to agoa recipients is confined to the top 5\% of the export distribution. On the contrary the gains to the recipients from exporting to the EU is mainly at the bottom 25\% and the median. There is an unambiguous decline in their exports to the rest of the world relative to the counter-factual countries they are compared with. The decomposition exercise supports the quantile results and shows that both coefficient and the covariate differences between the two groups explain the difference in the total change at the various quantiles.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: quantile regression; decomposition; agoa; trade preference
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F0 - General > F00 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F19 - Other

References

Abrevaya, J. and Dahl, C. M. (2008). The effects of birth inputs on birthweight. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 26(4):379–397.

Agostino, M. R., Aiello, F., and Cardamone, P. (2007). Analysing the impact of trade preferences in gravity models. does aggregation matter? TRADEAG Working Paper 07/4. Accessed June 14, 2009.

Aiello, F., Cardamone, P., and Agostino, M. (2010). Evaluating the impact of nonreciprocal trade preferences using gravity models. Applied Economics, 42(29).

Alexandraki, K. and Lankes, H. (2004). The impact of preference erosion on middle-income developing countries. IMF Working Paper, WP/04/169. Accessed June 7, 2009.

Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1):106–116.

Anderson, J. E. and van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1):170–192.

Anderson, J. E. and Yotov, Y. V. (2012). Gold standard gravity. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 17835.

Augier, P., Gasiorek, M., and Lai-Tong, C. (2004). Rules of origin and the EU-Med partnership: The case of textiles. The World Economy, 27(9):1449 – 1473. Accessed June 7, 2009.

Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2009). Bonus vetus OLS: a simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation. Journal of International Economics, 77(1):77–85.

Baldwin, R. and Taglioni, D. (2006). Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. Working Paper 12516, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Brenton, P. and Hoppe, M. (2006). The african growth and opportunity act, exports, and development in Sub-Saharan africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS 3996. Accessed July 31, 2009.

Brenton, P. and Ikezuki, T. (2004). The initial and potential impact of preferential access to the U.S. market under the african growth and opportunity act. Technical report, The World Bank.

Brenton, P. and Manchin, M. (2003). Making EU trade agreements work: The role of rules of origin. The World Economy, 26(5):755–769.

Brenton, P. and O¨ zden, c. (2005). Trade preferences for apparel and the role of rules of origin the case of Africa.

Bureau, J., Chakir, R., and Gallezot, J. (2006). The utilisation of EU and US trade preferences for developing countries in the Agri-Food sector by Jean-Christophe bureau, raja chakir, jacques gallezot.

Bureau, J., Chakir, R., and Gallezot, J. (2007). The utilisation of trade preferences for developing countries in the agri-food sector. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(2):175–198.

Cadot, O. and de Melo, J. (2007). Why OECD countries should reform rules of origin. World Bank Res Obs.

Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics. Cambridge University Press.

Canay, I. A. (2011). A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. The Econometrics Journal, 14(3):368–386.

Cardamone, P. (2007). A survey of the assessments of the effectiveness of preferential trade agreements using gravity models. TRADEAG Working Paper 07/09. Accessed June 14, 2009.

Carrere, C., Cadot, O., De, J. M., and Tumurchudur, B. (2011). Product specific rules of origin in EU and US preferential trading arrangements: An assessment. Working Paper halshs-00564704, HAL.

Chaney, T. (2008). Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade. American Economic Review, 98(4):1707–1721.

Cipollina, M. and Salvatici, L. (2010a). Reciprocal trade agreements in gravity models: A Meta- Analysis. Review of International Economics, 18(1):63–80.

Cipollina, M. and Salvatici, L. (2010b). The trade impact of european union agricultural preferences. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 13(1):87–106.

Collier, P. and Venables, A. J. (2007). Rethinking trade preferences to help diversify african exports. World Economy, Vol 30(8) pp. 1326--1345. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01042.x

Condon, N. and Stern, M. (2011). The effectiveness of african growth and opportunity act (AGOA) in increasing trade from least developed countries: a systematic review. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

Edwards, L. and Lawrence, R. Z. (2010). AGOA rules: The intended and unintended consequences of special fabric provisions. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 16623.

Firpo, S., Fortin, N. M., and Lemieux, T. (2009). Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica, 77(3):953973.

Fortin, N., Lemieux, T., and Firpo, S. (2010). Decomposition methods in economics. Working Paper 16045, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Francois, J., Hoekman, B., and Manchin, M. (2006). Preference erosion and multilateral trade liberalization. World Bank Econ Rev, 20(2):197–216.

Frazer, G. and Van Biesebroeck, J. (2010). Trade growth under the african growth and opportunity act. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(1):128–144.

Geraci, M. and Bottai, M. (2007). Quantile regression for longitudinal data using the asymmetric laplace distribution. Biostatistics, 8(1):140–154.

Gibbon, P. (2003). AGOA, lesotho’s ’Clothing miracle’ & the politics of sweatshops. Review of African Political Economy, 30(96):315–320.

Giovannetti, G. and Sanfilippo, M. (2009). Do chinese exports crowd-out african goods? an econometric analysis by country and sector. European Journal of Development Research, 21(4):506–530.

Helpman, E., Melitz, M., and Rubinstein, Y. (2007). Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 12927. published as Elhanan Helpman & Marc Melitz & Yona Rubinstein, 2008. ”Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 123(2), pages 441-487, 05.

Hoekman, B., Martin, W., and Braga, C. (2006). Preference Erosion: The Terms of the Debate. Washington D. C.: The World Bank. [Accessed June 2, 2009].

Hoekman, B. M., Martin, W., and Braga, C. A. P. (2009). Trade Preference Erosion: Measurement and Policy Response. World Bank Publications.

Koenker, R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91(1):74–89.

Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press.

Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1):33–50.

Koenker, R. and Hallock, K. F. (2001). Quantile regression. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4):143–156.

Lederman, D. and O¨ zden, C. (2007). Geopolitical interests and preferential access to U.S. markets. Economics and Politics, 19(2):235 – 258.

Liapis, P. S. (2007). Preferential Trade Agreements: How much do they benefit developing economies. OECD Publishing.

Machado, J. A. F. and Mata, J. (2005). Counterfactual decomposition of changes in wage distributions using quantile regression. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(4):445465.

Mattoo, A., Roy, D., and Subramanian, A. (2003). The africa growth and opportunity act and its rules of origin: Generosity undermined? The World Economy, 26(6):829–851.

McKay, M. (2012). Do trade preferences work? african growth and opportunity act and apparel exports from sub saharan africa. Paper presented at the Centre for Study of African Economies 2012 conferences.

Melly, B. (2005). Decomposition of differences in distribution using quantile regression. Labour Economics, 12(4):577–590.

Melly, B. (2006). Estimation of counterfactual distributions using quantile regression. Working Paper.

Mueller, T. F. (2008). The effect of the african growth and opportunity act (AGOA) on african exports to the U.S. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA’s 49th annual convention, bridging multiple divides, San Francisco, CA, USA, Mar 26, 2008.

Nilsson, L. (2005). Comparative effects of EU and US trade policies on developing country exports. Accessed June 7, 2009.

Nilsson, L. (2011). Small trade flows and preference utilisation: The case of the european union. South African Journal of Economics, 79(4):392–410.

Nouve, K. (2005). Estimating the effects of AGOA on African exports using a dynamic panel analysis.

Nouve, K. and Staatz, J. (2003). The African growth and opportunity act and the latent agricultural export response in sub-saharan Africa. Paper prepared for the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, July 27-30.

Powell, D. (2011). Unconditional quantile regression for panel data with exogenous or endogenous regressors.

Rosen, A. M. (2012). Set identification via quantile restrictions in short panels. Journal of Econometrics, 166(1):127–137.

Rotunno, L., V´ezina, P.-L., and Wang, Z. (2012). The rise and fall of (chinese) african apparel exports. CSAE Working Paper WPS/2012-12.

Seyoum, B. (2007). Export performance of developing countries under the africa growth and opportunity act experience from us trade with sub-saharan africa. Journal of Economic Studies, 34(6):515 – 533.

Silva, J. M. C. S. and Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4):641–658.

Tadesse, B. and Fayissa, B. (2008). The impact of african growth and opportunity act (AGOA) on U.S. imports from Sub-Saharan africa (SSA). Journal of International Development, 20(7):920– 941.

Tadesse, B., Fayissa, B., and McColley, A. (2008). Does a unilateral policy change promote trade? the case of african growth and opportunity act. Working paper.

UNCTAD (2003). Trade Preferences for LDCs: An Early Assessment of Benefits and Possible Improvements. Technical report, UNCTAD, United Nations: New York and Geneva. Accessed July 14, 2009.

UNCTAD (2007). Erosion of trade preferences in the post-Hong Kong framework: From ”trade is better than aid” to ”aid for trade”. Technical report, United Nations. Accessed June 20, 2009.

Westerlund, J. and Wilhelmsson, F. (2009). Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Applied Economics.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Zappile, T. M. (2011). Nonreciprocal trade agreements and trade: Does the african growth and opportunity act (AGOA) increase trade? International Studies Perspectives, 12(1):46–67.