تقدير الطلب على عنصر العمل البشرى فى الزراعة المصرية طبقاً للمنهج الثنائى

Atta, Sahra Khaleel and Shehata, Emad Abd Elmessih (2008): تقدير الطلب على عنصر العمل البشرى فى الزراعة المصرية طبقاً للمنهج الثنائى. Published in: Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Economics , Vol. 18, No. 4 (December 2008): pp. 1073-1088.

Abstract

Human labor input is considered as one of the most important inputs in the economy, especially in the agricultural sector, that contributes in increasing production and employment, so the cycle of economic development must be pushed to achieve the most economic efficiency from the agricultural labor input. The main research problem and the objective of the study, can be summarized in the nature of demand on the labor input, and the relations among labor input with the other inputs. To achieve and exploring the objectives, the study used the dual approach of profit and cost functions, and estimated two types of models to each one, the first is: Cobb-Douglas and Transcendental Logarithmic profit functions, that take into account including the prices of variable inputs only, i.e., labor wage, and the quantities of fixed inputs, i.e., capital and land. The second is: Cobb-Douglas and Transcendental Logarithmic cost functions, that take into account including the prices of variable and fixed inputs, i.e., labor wage and price of capital, in addition inclusion the value of production. To derive the demand on labor input, the study used Zellner’s method of restricted seemingly unrelated regressions (RSUR), to capture the restrictions available among different equations in the model. Data were collected from different sources, through the period subject to analysis (1990-2006). The general wholesale price index (2000=100), was used to deflate the price variables. The results of the study, showed that, there was a negative relation between the wage and labor, according to the own price elasticities of demand, also there was substitution between labor and capital, according to the cross price elasticities of demand, tended to the labor input, as a result of labor intensity, and may be due to increasing the cost of technology, especially in the Egyptian small farms. The hidden unemployment in the Egyptian agricultural sector didn’t exist. The results indicated that, the value of marginal product of labor, was greater than the labor farm wage, so this reflects the fact of efficiency of using human labor input in the Egyptian agriculture. Finally, the study recommended to apply technological tools with non intensive capital, to encourage the demand on human labor, investing in the agricultural projects that capture human labor, and increasing the wages that reflect the real value of marginal product of labor and his productivity to achieve the efficiency of human labor input in the Egyptian agricultural sector.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Estimation of Demand on Human Labor Input in the Egyptian Agricultural According to Dual Approach
• Language: Arabic
• Keywords: Labor Demand, Profit, Cost functions, Cobb-Douglas, Transcendental Logarithmic Functions, SUR
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General

References

1. Antle, J. & Ali S.“Rice Technology, Farmer Rationality and Agricultural Policy in Egypt” Am. J. Ag. Econ., Vol. 65, No. 4, Nov., 1983; 667-674.

2. Berndt, E. & Wood D. “Technology, Prices and the Derived Demand for Energy” Rev. Econ. Stat., Vol. 57, No. 3, Aug., 1975; 259-268.

3. Box, George & Pierce D. “Distribution of Residual Autocorrelations in Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Time Series Models” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., Vol. 65, 1970; 1509-1526.

4. Chand, Ramesh & J. L. Kaul “A Note on the Use of the Cobb-Douglas Profit Function” Am. J. Ag. Econ., Vol. 68, No. 1, Feb., 1986; 162-164.

5. Engle, Robert “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of Variance of United Kingdom Inflation” Econometrica, Vol.50, July, 1982; 987-1007.

6. Greene, William “Econometric Analysis” 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 2003.

7. Huang, Kuo “Factor Demand in the U.S. Food Manufacturing Industry” Am. J. Ag. Econ., Vol. 73, No. 3, Aug., 1991; 615-620.

8. Jarque, C. & Bera A. “A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals” Inter. Stat. Rev., Vol. 55, 1987; 163-172.

9. Khan, M. & Dennis R. “Effects of Farm Size on Economic Efficiency: The Case of Pakistan” Am. J. Ag. Econ., Vol. 61, No. 1, Feb., 1979; 64-69.

10. Lau, Lawrence & Pan A. Yotopoulos “Profit, Supply, and Factor Demand Functions” Am. J. Ag. Econ., Vol. 54, No. 1, Feb., 1972; 11-18.

11. Lianos, T. “The Relative Share of Labor in United States Agriculture, 1949-1968” Am. J. Ag. Econ., Vol. 53, No. 3, Aug., 1971; 411-422.

12. Lovell, C. “CES and VES Production Functions in a Cross-Section Context” J. Polit. Econ., Vol. 81, May/June, 1973; 705-720.

13. Ngheiep, L. “The Structure and Changes of Technology in Prewar Japanese Agriculture” Am.J. Ag. Econ., Vol.61, No.4, Nov.,1979; 687-693.

14. Sidhu, Surjit & Carlos A. “Estimation Farm-Level Input Demand and Wheat Supply in the Indian Punjab Using a TransLog Profit Function” Am. J. Ag. Econ., Vol. 63, No. 2, May, 1981; 237-247.

15. Srivastava, Uma & Earl O. Heady “Technological Change and Relative Factor Shares in Indian Agriculture: An Empirical Analysis” Am. J. Ag. Econ., Vol. 55, No. 3, Aug., 1973; 509-514.

16. Yotopoulos, Pan, Lawrence Lau & Wuu-Long Lin “Macroeconomic Output Supply and Factor Demand Functions in the Agriculture of the Province of Taiwan”Am.J.Ag.Econ.,Vol.58, No. 2, May, 1976; 333-340.

17. Zellner, Arnold “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Test for Aggregation Bias” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., Vol. 57, June , 1962; 348-368.