Shoji, Masahiro (2013): Guilt aversion and peer effects in crime: experimental and empirical evidence from Bangladesh.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_44746.pdf Download (234kB) | Preview |
Abstract
I conducted an artefactual field experiment to identify whether guilt reduces crime, and how the crime reduction effects of guilt change due to peer effects. Guilt aversion predicts the occurrence of peer effects caused by changes in guilt sensitivity and belief. I found supporting evidence of changes in belief. My experiment is novel in that it develops an approach to elicit guilt sensitivity. Using this data, I show behavioural patterns consistent with guilt aversion but not with pure altruism or trustworthiness. The external validity of guilt sensitivity is also shown.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Guilt aversion and peer effects in crime: experimental and empirical evidence from Bangladesh |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Guilt aversion; crime; experiment; external validity; peer effects; broken windows theory |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law |
Item ID: | 44746 |
Depositing User: | Masahiro Shoji |
Date Deposited: | 05 Mar 2013 23:33 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 11:58 |
References: | Andreoni, J., and Bernheim, D.B. (2009). ‘Social image and the 50-50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects’, Econometrica, vol. 77, pp. 1607–36. Barmettler, F., Fehr, E. and Zehnder, C. (2012). ‘Big experimenter is watching you! Anonymity and prosocial behavior in the laboratory’, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 75, pp. 17–34. Barslund, M., Rand, J., Tarp, F. and Chiconela, J. (2007). ‘Understanding victimisation: The case of Mozambique’, World Development, vol. 35, pp. 1237–58. Battigalli, P. and Dufwenberg, M. (2007). ‘Guilt in games’, American Economic Review, vol. 97, pp. 170–6. Bayer, P., Hjalmarsson, R. and Pozen, D. (2009). ‘Building criminal capital behaind bars: Peer Effects in juvenile corrections’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 124, pp. 105–147. Becker, G.S. (1968). ‘Crime and punishment: An economic approach’, The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 76, pp. 169–217. Bohnet, I. and Zeckhauser, R. (2004). ‘Social comparisons in ultimatum’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 106, pp. 495–510. Bourguignon, F. (1999). ‘Crime, violence and inequitable development’, Paper prepared for the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics. Brandts, J. and Charness, G. (2011). ‘The strategy versus the direct-response method: A first survey of experimental comparisons’, Experimental Economics, vol. 14, pp. 375–98. Cason, T.N. and Mui, V.–L. (1998). ‘Social influence in the sequential dictator game’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 42, pp. 248–65. Charness, G. and Dufwenberg, M. (2006). ‘Promises and partnership’, Econometrica, vol. 74, pp. 1579–1601. Charness, G. and Dufwenberg, M. (2010). ‘Bare promises: An experiment’, Economics Letters, vol. 107, pp. 281–3. Charness, G. and Dufwenberg, M. (2011). ‘Participation’, American Economic Review, vol. 101, pp. 1211–37. Dahl, G. and DellaVigna, S. (2009). ‘Does movie violence increase violent crime?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 124, pp. 677–734. Dufwenberg, M., Gächter, S. and Hennig–Schmidt, H. (2011). ‘The framing of games and the psychology of play’, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 73, pp. 459–78. Eichenberger, R. and Oberholzer–Gee, F. (1998). ‘Rational moralists: The role of fairness in democratic economic politics’, Public Choice, vol. 94, pp. 191–210. Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Mollerstrom, J. and Munkhammar, S. (2012). ‘Social framing effects: Preferences or beliefs?’, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 76, pp. 117–30. Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Tjøtta, S. and Torsvik, G. (2010). ‘Testing guilt aversion’, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 68, pp. 95–107. Fafchamps, M. and Minten, B. (2006). ‘Crime, transitory poverty, and isolation: Evidence from Madagascar’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 54, pp. 579–603. Fafchamps, M. and Moser, C. (2003). ‘Crime, isolation, and law enforcement’, Journal of African Economies, vol. 12, pp. 625–71. Falk, A. and Fischbacher, U. (2002). ‘“Crime” in the lab-detecting social interaction’, European Economic Review, vol. 46, pp. 859–69. Fehr, E. and Hoff, K. (2011). ‘Introduction: Tastes, castes and culture: The influence of society on preferences’, Economic Journal, vol. 121, pp. F396–F412. Fischbacher, U. and Gächter, S. (2010). ‘Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments’, American Economic Review, vol. 100, pp. 541–56. Frey, B. and Meier, S. (2004). ‘Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “Conditional Cooperation” in a Field Experiment’, The American Economic Review, vol. 94, pp. 1717–22. Funk, P. (2005). ‘Governmental action, social norms and criminal behavior’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 161, pp. 522–535. Gaviria, A. and Pagés, C. (2002). ‘Patterns of crime victimisation in Latin American cities’, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 67, pp. 181–203. Glaeser, E.L., Sacerdote, B. and Scheinkman, J.A. (1996). ‘Crime and social interactions’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 111, pp. 507–48. Guala, F. and Mittone, L. (2005). ‘Experiments in economics: External validity and the robustness of phenomena’, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 12, pp. 495–515. Kawagoe, T. and Narita, Y. (2011). ‘Guilt aversion revisited: An experimental test of a new model’, mimeo. Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S. and Steg, L. (2008). ‘The spreading of disorder’, Science, vol. 322, pp. 1681–5. Kelling, G. L. and Wilson, J. Q. (1982). ‘Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety’, The Atlantic Monthly. Lederman, D., Norman, L. and Ana Maria, M. (2002). ‘Violent crime: Does social capital matter?’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 50, pp. 509–39. Levitt, S.D. (2004). ‘Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s: Four factors that explain the decline and six’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 18, pp. 163–90. Lindbeck, A. (1997). ‘Incentives and social norms in household behavior’, The American Economic Review, vol. 87, pp. 370–7. Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S. and Weibull, J.W. (1999). ‘Social norms and economic incentives in the welfare state’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 114, pp. 1–35. Loewenstein, G. (1999). ‘Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics’, The Economic Journal, vol. 109, pp. 25–34. Ludwig, J. and Kling, J.R. (2007). ‘Is crime contagious?’, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 50, pp. 491–518. Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. and Hirschfield, P. (2001). ‘Urban poverty and juvenile crime: Evidence from a randomised housing-mobility experiment’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 116, pp. 655–79. Manski, C.F. (1993). ‘Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem’, The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 60, pp. 531–42. Manski, C.F. (2000). ‘Economic analysis of social interactions’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 14, pp. 115–36. Miettinen, T. and Suetens, S. (2008). ‘Communication and guilt in a prisoner’s dilemma’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 52, pp. 945–60. Murphy, K.M., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1993). ‘Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth?’, American Economic Review, vol. 83, pp. 409–14. Patacchini, E. and Zenou, Y. (2008). ‘The strength of weak ties in crime’, European Economic Review, vol. 52, pp. 209–36. Patacchini, E. and Zenou, Y. (2012). ‘Juvenile delinquency and conformism’, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organisation, vol. 28, pp. 1–31. Rasmusen, E. (1996). ‘Stigma and self-fulfilling expectations of criminality’, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 39, pp. 519–43. Reuben, E., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L. (2009). ‘Is mistrust self-fulfilling?’, Economics Letters, vol. 104, pp. 89–91. Sah, R.K. (1991). ‘Social osmosis and patterns of crime’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 99, pp. 1272–95. Schildberg–Hörisch, H. and Strassmair, C. (2010). ‘An experimental test of the deterrence hypothesis’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organisation, vol. 26, pp. 1–13. Sliwka, D. (2007). ‘Trust as a signal of a social norm and the hidden costs of incentive schemes’, The American Economic Review, vol. 97, pp. 999–1012. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). ‘Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases’, Science, vol. 185, pp. 1124–31. Vanberg, C. (2008). ‘Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations’, Econometrica, vol. 76, pp. 1467–80. Wilson, J.Q. and Kelling, G.L. (2003). ‘Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety’, in (E. McLaughlin, J. Muncie and G. Hughes eds.), Criminological Perspectives: Essential Readings, Trowbridge, Wiltshire: Cromwell Press. Zafar, B. (2011). ‘An experimental investigation of why individuals conform’, European Economic Review, vol. 55, pp. 774–98. Zenou, Y. (2003). ‘The spacial aspects of crime’, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 1, pp. 459–67. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/44746 |