Majumdar, Raju (2013): On the alternative proxies for estimating firm growth in empirical corporate finance literature: Evidence from Indian manufacturing sector.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_44874.pdf Download (323kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Empirical tests of theoretical propositions necessitate quantitative estimation of qualitative firm level attribute. The challenges of such estimation are nowhere more pronounced than it is the context of estimating firm growth as evinced from the multiplicity of proxies used. However in using or theorizing about the validity of these alternative proxies in their quest to measure a common intangible called ‘firm growth’, the issue of inter-relationship between these variables and the dimensions of growth it is capable of capturing has never been explored. This research paper is an attempt to address this issue. This paper uses a sample of 429 listed manufacturing firms for the period 2004-05 to 2010-11, and employs correlation analysis as well as a panel data model to reach its conclusion. Findings of this research suggest that the alternative financial statements based measures of firm growth are not correlated to an extent that can warrant substitution or interchangeable use. And in certain cases correlations are stronger with time lags than without. Furthermore, it is also observed that financial statements based measures of growth have limited explanatory power when it comes to explaining variations in market-to-book ratio of firms. Findings of this paper coupled with studies on the linkage between macroeconomic and capital market conditions with equity prices, provides indirect evidence that market-to-book ratio factors in the forward looking perspective of growth that the other alternative measures are not capable enough to capture, given their historical nature.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On the alternative proxies for estimating firm growth in empirical corporate finance literature: Evidence from Indian manufacturing sector |
English Title: | On the alternative proxies for estimating firm growth in empirical corporate finance literature: Evidence from Indian manufacturing sector |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Firm growth, empirical measures |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance |
Item ID: | 44874 |
Depositing User: | Raju Majumdar |
Date Deposited: | 11 Mar 2013 11:11 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 21:33 |
References: | References: Barclay, M. J. and Smith, C. W. (2005), “The Capital Structure Puzzle: The Evidence Revisited”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol.17, No. 1, pp 2-17. Barclay, M. J. and Smith, C.W. (1999), “The Capital Structure Puzzle: Another Look at the Evidence”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol.12, No. 1, pp 8-20. Barclay, M. J., Smith C. W. and Watts, R. (1995), “The determinants of corporate leverage and dividend policies”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 4–19. Bevan, A. A. and Danbolt, J. (2002). “Capital structure and its determinants in the UK – a decompositional analysis”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 159-170. Bevan, A. A. and Danbolt, J. (2004). “Testing for inconsistencies in the estimation of UK capital structure determinants”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 55-66. Bhaduri, S. N. (2002), “Determinants of corporate borrowing: some evidence from the Indian corporate structure”, Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 26 No.2, pp. 200-215. Bhaduri, S. N. (2002a), “Determinants of capital structure choice: a study of Indian corporate sector”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 12, No. 9, pp. 655-665 Bhole, L. M. and Mahakud, J. (2004), “Trends and determinants of capital structure in India: a panel data analysis”, Finance India, Vol. XVIII, No.1, pp. 37-55 Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguç-Kunt, L., & Maksimovic, V. (2001), “Capital structures in developing countries”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 87–130. Bordo, M. D., Dueker, M. J. and Wheelock, D. C., (2008), “Inflation, Monetary Policy and Stock Market Conditions”, NBER Working Paper 14019, May, National Bureau of Economic Research. Cassola, N. and Morana, C. (2004), “Monetary Policy and the Stock Market in the Euro Area”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 387-399. Chen, J. J. (2004), “Determinants of capital structure of Chinese-listed companies”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, pp 1341– 1351. Cotei, C. and Farhat, J. (2009), “The trade-Off theory and the pecking order theory: are they mutually exclusive?” North American Journal of Finance and Banking Research, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 1-16. Damodaran, A (2002), "Relative Valuation", Corporate Finance Theory and Practice, Wiley Student Edition, pp. 750-790. Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Maksimovic, V. (1994), “Capital Structure in Developing Countries: Evidence from Ten Countries”, Policy Research Working Paper, 1320, The World Bank. Dixit, A. K. and Pindyck, R. S. (1995), “The options approach to capital investment”, Harvard Business Review, May/June 1995 Kakani, R. (1999), “The Determinants of Capital Structure: An Econometric Analysis”, Finance India, Vol. 13 No.1, pp. 51-69. Mahakud, J. (2006), “Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure: evidence from Indian corporate sector”, The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, Vol. 12, No.11, pp. 16-26 Mahakud, J. and Bhole, L. M. (2003), “Determinants of corporate capital structure in India: a dynamic panel data analysis”, ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, Vol. 9 No. 6, pp. 41-51. Manos, R., Green, V., and Murinde, C. J. (2001), “Business groups and capital structure: evidence on Indian firms”, Institute of Development Policy and Management, Working paper No. 34, IDMP Archived Publications, p. 43 available at http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/archive/fd/fd_wp34.htm (accessed on 10 October 2012). Mishra, S. M (2011), “Determinants of capital structure – a study of manufacturing sector PSUs in India”, Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Financial Management and Economics, IPEDR, Vol. 11, pp. 247-52. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. H. (1958), “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 48 No.3, pp. 261-297 Mukherjee, S. and Mahakud, J. (2012), “Are trade-off and pecking order theories of capital structure mutually exclusive? Evidence from Indian manufacturing companies”, Journal of Management Research, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 41-55. Myers, S. (1977), “The determinants of corporate borrowing”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 5 No 2, pp. 147-175. Norvaisiene, R., & Stankeviciene, J. (2007), “The interaction of internal determinants and decisions on capital structure at the Baltic listed companies”, Economics of Engineering Decisions, Vol. 2 No. 52, pp.7–17. Rajan, R. G. and Zingales, L. (1995), “What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. L No. 5, pp 1421-59. Rapach, D. E., (2001), “Macro Shocks and Real Stock Prices”, Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 56 No. 5, pp. 5-26. Serrasqueiro, Z. and Nunes, P. M. (2010), “Are trade – off and pecking order theories mutually exclusive in explaining capital structure decisions?” African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 4 No. 11, pp. 2216-2230. Shah, A. and Khan, S. (2007), “Determinants of capital structure: Evidence from Pakistani panel data”, International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 3 No.4, pp.265-282. Titman, S. and Wessels, R. (1988), “The determinants of capital structure choice”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 1-19. Wald, J. K. (1999), “How firm characteristics affect capital structure: an international comparison”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 22 No.2, pp. 161-187. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/44874 |