Oliveira, Livio Luiz Soares de and Neto, Giácomo Balbinotto and Cortes, Renan Xavier and Schmidt, Lucas (2013): Quem acredita em Deus? testando o modelo de Durkin e Greeley de escolha racional envolvendo incerteza.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_45091.pdf Download (540kB) | Preview |
Abstract
One of the most important models of rational choice to religion is the one presented by Durkin and Greeley. The authors base the problem of uncertainty of religious choice in Pascal's wager as a problem of maximizing expected utility and faith as an insurance In this paper, we test the hypotheses of the model with research data on the frequency of religious Religion Project Brazil 2002. Two dependent variables were used in the tests: attendance and religious faith. Both were positively influenced by the age of individuals and the fact that both spouses have the same religion. The religious attendance was positively correlated with belief in God, with belief in the afterlife, with religious attendance of theirs parents, and to remain in the religion of origin
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Quem acredita em Deus? testando o modelo de Durkin e Greeley de escolha racional envolvendo incerteza |
English Title: | Who believes in God? testing the model's Durkin and Greeley to Brazil |
Language: | Portuguese |
Keywords: | Rational Choice, religious choice, religion, religious attendance, faith |
Subjects: | Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z12 - Religion |
Item ID: | 45091 |
Depositing User: | Livio Luiz Soares Oliveira |
Date Deposited: | 17 Mar 2013 15:07 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 17:30 |
References: | AZZI, C.; EHRENBERG, R. (1975), “Household allocation of time and church attendance”. Journal of Political Economy, 83, 1:27-56. BECK, John H. (2007), “The Pelagian Controversy: An Economic Analysis”. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66, 4:681-696. DURKIN, John T., Jr; GREELEY, Andrew M.A . (1991), “Model of Religious Choice Under Uncertainty: on Responding Rationally to the Non-Rational”. Rationality and Society, 3, 2:178-196. EKELUND, Robert B. Jr.; HEBERT, Robert F.; TOLLINSON, Robert D. (1992), “The Economics of Sin and Redemption: Purgatory as a Market-Pull Innovation”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 19, 1:1-15. ELWELL, Walter A. (1988), Enciclopédia Histórico-Teológica da Igreja Cristã. São Paulo, Sociedade Religiosa Edições Vida Nova, v.1 ___________________. (1990), Enciclopédia Histórico-Teológica da Igreja Cristã. São Paulo, Sociedade Religiosa Edições Vida Nova, v.2 e 3. FISHER, R.A. (1925), Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. GOODMAN, Leo A; KRUSKAL, William H. (1954), “Measures of association for ross classification”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 268:732-764. IANNACCONE, Laurence. R. (1988), “A formal model of church and sect”. The American Journal of Sociology, Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure, 94, S:241-268, 1988. _____________. (1992), “Sacrifice and Stigma: Reducing Free-riding in Cults, Communes, and Other Collectives”. The Journal of Political Economy, 100, 2:271-291. _______________. (1994), “Why Strict Churches Are Strong”. The American Journal of Sociology, 99, 5:1180-1211. JORDAN, Jeff. (1994), Gambling on God-Essays On Pascal’s Wager. Boston, Rowman & Littlefields Publishers, Inc. KRUSKAL, William H.; WALLIS, W. Allen. (1952), “Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47 , 260: 583–621. MONTGOMERY, James. (1992), “Pascal’s Wager and the Limits of Rational Choice: A Comment on Durkin and Greeley”. Rationality and Society, 4, 1: 117-121. SIEGEL, Sidney; CASTELLAN, N. John, Jr. (1988), Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, second edition. New York: McGraw–Hill. STOLZEMBERG, Ross; BLAIR-LOY; WAITE, Linda J. (1995), “Religious Participation in Early Adutlhood:Age and Life Cicle Effects on Church Membership”. American Sociological Review, 60, 1:84-103 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/45091 |