Portugal Ought Not Restructure Its Debt

Rodrigues, Pedro G. (2012): Portugal Ought Not Restructure Its Debt.

Abstract

At the epicenter of the international financial crisis is a debt crisis where low-quality assets and the slowdown in economic activity have made creditors worldwide wary of the ability and willingness of debtors to comply with their obligations. In this context of indebtedness, now perceived as excessive, where expenses on interest are growing, some defend debt restructuring to alleviate this burden. This brief note aims to contribute towards the current debate with an analysis of the benefits and costs related to the possible but uncertain unilateral decision by Portugal to alleviate its expenses on interest. Considering i) the most recent international evidence that suggests that in the majority of the cases a debt restructuring is accompanied by a banking crisis and/or by a currency crisis, ii) that Portugal does not meet any of the cost-minimizing criteria, and iii) that an exit from the euro would probably be inevitable as a result of such a decision, we conclude that Portugal ought not restructure its debt.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Debt crisis; International financial crisis; Restructuring; Troika
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt

References

Abreu M. (2001). From EC Accession to EMU Participation: The Portuguese Disinflation Experience in the Period of 1984-1998, Economic Bulletin, Banco de Portugal, December.

De Paoli B., Hoggarth G., e Sapporta V. (2006). Costs of Sovereign Default, Bank of England, Financial Stability Paper No. 1, London.

_____. (2009). Output Costs of Sovereign Crises: Some Empirical Estimates, Bank of England, Working Paper No. 362, London, UK (http://www.bankofengland.co.uk /publications/ Documents/workingpapers/wp362.pdf).

International Monetary Fund. (2002). Sovereign Debt Restructurings and the Domestic Eco-nomy: Experience in Four Recent Cases, Policy Development and Review Department, Washington DC.

_____. (2003). Crisis Resolution in the Context of Sovereign Debt Restructuring: A Summary of Considerations, Policy Development and Review Department, Washington DC.

_____. (2006). Cross-Country Experience with Restructuring of Sovereign Debt and Res-toring Debt Sustainability, Policy Development and Review Department, Washington DC.

_____. (2011). Portugal: Letter of Intent, Memorandum of Economic and Financial Policies, and Technical Memorandum of Understanding, Washington DC.

Roubini N., e Setser B. (2004). Bailouts or Bail-ins? Responding to Financial Crises in Emerging Economies, The Petersen Institute for International Economics, (http:// bookstore.piie.com/book-store/378.html).