Yang, Zhenzeng (2013): Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Complexity and FDI flows into China.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_47237.pdf Download (604kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Main purpose of this paper is to explain why large amount of foreign direct investment (FDI) flowed into low IPR protecting China and other emerging economies. There are two key assumptions, imitation costs are positively related to complexity and they are higher when imitating a product designed only for foreign market. By incorporating complexity into Dixit-Stiglitz Framework, the model shows that strengthening of IPR protection in the host country not only raises an MNE's profit and stimulates inward FDI, but also induce more high complexity FDI. Moreover, as cost-oriented FDI is less sensitive to host IPR protection, developing host countries with low IPR protection attract relatively more cost-oriented FDI. The model implies that strengthening of IPR protection can help emerging economies attract more complex FDI and increase the fraction of market-oriented FDI.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Complexity and FDI flows into China |
English Title: | Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Complexity and FDI flows into China |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Intellectual Property Rights, Licensing, Imitation, Multinational Enterprise, Foreign Direct Investment |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F21 - International Investment ; Long-Term Capital Movements F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital |
Item ID: | 47237 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Zhenzeng Yang |
Date Deposited: | 28 May 2013 18:01 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 18:23 |
References: | Antràs, P., and Helpman, E. Contractual frictions and global sourcing. Working Paper 12747, National Bureau of Economic Research, December 2006. Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., and Foley, C. F. Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? empirical evidence from u.s. firm-level data. Working Paper 11516, National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2005. Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., Foley, C. F., and Saggi, K. Intellectual property rights, imitation, and foreign direct investment: Theory and evidence. Working Paper 13033, National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2007. Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., Foley, C. F., and Saggi, K. Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development? Journal of International Economics 83, 1 (2011), 27 – 36. Carluccio, J., and Fally, T. Global sourcing under imperfect capital markets. Review of Economics and Statistics 94, 3 (2012), 740–763. Cebrián, M. The structure of payments as a way to alleviate contractual hazards in international technology licensing. Industrial and Corporate Change 18, 6 (2009), 1135–1160. Dixit, A. K., and Stiglitz, J. E. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. The American Economic Review 67, 3 (1977), 297–308. Ekholm, K., Forslid, R., and Markusen, J. Export-platform foreign direct investment. Working Paper 9517, National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2003. Ethier, W. J., and Markusen, J. R. Multinational firms, technology diffusion and trade. Journal of International Economics 41, 1 (1996), 1–28. Grossman, G., and Helpman, E. Endogenous product cycles. Economic Journal 101, 408 (1991), 1214–29. Grossman, G., and Helpman, E. Quality ladders and product cycles. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1991), 557 – 586. Grossman, S. J., and Hart, O. D. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94, 4 (1986), 691–719. Hanson, G. H., Raymond J. Mataloni, J., and Slaughter, M. J. Expansion strategies of u.s. multinational firms. Working Paper 8433, National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2001. Hart, O. D., and Moore, J. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 98, 6 (1990), 1119–58. Helpman, E. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61, 6 (November 1993), 1247–80. Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., and Yeaple, S. R. Export versus fdi with heterogeneous firms. The American Economic Review 94, 1 (2004), 300–316. 18 Javorcik, B. S. The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. European Economic Review 48, 1 (2004), 39 – 62. Khoury, T. A., and Peng, M. W. Does institutional reform of intellectual property rights lead to more inbound fdi? evidence from latin america and the caribbean. Journal of World Business 46, 3 (2011), 337 – 345. Mansfield, E. Intellectual property protection, foreign direct investment and technology transfer. International Finance Corporation discussion paper, 19 (1994). Mansfield, E. Intellectual property protection, foreign direct investment and technology transfer. International Finance Corporation discussion paper, 27 (1995). Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M., and Wagner, S. Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study. The Economic Journal 91, 364 (1981), 907–918. Markusen, J. R. The boundaries of multinational enterprises and the theory of international trade. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, 2 (1995), 169–189. Markusen, J. R. Contracts, intellectual property rights, and multinational investment in developing countries. Journal of International Economics 53, 1 (2001), 189 – 204. Markusen, J. R. Contracts, intellectual property rights, and multinational investment in developing countries. Journal of International Economics 53, 1 (2001), 189–204. Maskus, K. E. Intel lectual property rights in the global economy. Peterson Institute, 2000. Melitz, M. J. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71, 6 (2003), 1695–1725. Nunnenkamp, P., and Spatz, J. Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment: The role of industry and host-country characteristics. Kiel Working Papers 1167, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, 2003. Puttitanun, T. Intellectual property rights and entry choices. Working Papers 0027, San Diego State University, Department of Economics, May 2007. Smith, P. J. How do foreign patent rights affect u.s. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses? Journal of International Economics 55, 2 (2001), 411 – 439. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/47237 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Complexity and Multinational Firms. (deposited 09 May 2013 12:26)
- Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Complexity and FDI flows into China. (deposited 28 May 2013 18:01) [Currently Displayed]