Kunstadt, Robert and Maggioni, Ilaria (2013): Tax-paying for Fun and Profit.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_47432.pdf Download (460kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Modern advances give us the ability to re-engineer the taxation system to benefit from computerized automation and the insights of modern psychology. People like to do things that bring a tangible reward. Tax-paying should be made FUN, not a chore. You will want to participate if you perceive a direct benefit. This new model selectively adapts the old English system of raising money by granting royal monopolies. A tax-paying entity would be allowed to make a bid on the percentage of tax it would pay for acquiring monopoly rights on a particular venture, posted publicly on a government-auction website for others to see and to post their alternative bids. Proposals put out for bid could immediately be tested for market viability by getting a thumbs-up/thumbs-down from the general public. The rewards to the proposer and to the public can be immediately perceived by all. Hence, the conditions for a positive stimulus-response-reward loop are fulfilled. Tax-paying becomes both fun and profitable, even more gratifying than betting in Las Vegas, because the bidder gets a perceptible benefit from it right away. The advantage to the state and its citizens is that monopoly efficiency does not just serve the monopolist but also the public. The would-be monopolist must make a precise calculation of how much to offer the state in taxes; upon pain of losing the auction to a competitor. With minimal government intervention, the “invisible hand” of economic theory is put to the task of serving the public good. (Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) Classification: H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue; H21 - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation; H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies; H27 - Other Sources of Revenue)
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Tax-paying for Fun and Profit |
English Title: | Tax-paying for Fun and Profit |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Revenue; Efficiency; Optimal Taxation; Business Taxes; Sources of Revenue; Monopoly; Bid; Bidding; Internet; Automation; Auction; Competition |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H27 - Other Sources of Revenue |
Item ID: | 47432 |
Depositing User: | Robert Kunstadt |
Date Deposited: | 06 Jun 2013 09:49 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 03:35 |
References: | Vivek Shankar, “Buffett Charity Lunch Auction Reaps Record $3.46 Million”, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg Business Week, June 11, 2012. Mao Tse Tung, “Problems of War and Strategy” (November 6, 1938), Selected Works, Vol. II. Bruce Weber, “J. Paul Getty III, 54, Dies; Had Ear Cut Off by Captors”, The New York Times, February 7, 2011. Patrick Radden Keefe, “The Snow Kings of Mexico”, The New York Times Magazine, June 17, 2012). Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue, 275 U.S. 87, 100 (1927). Thomas L. Friedman, “The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century”, Douglas & McIntyre (2005). Genesis 41:34-37. Adam Smith, "Theory of Moral Sentiment", (1759), pp. 184–5 of The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. i, Oxford University Press (1982). Richard A. Posner, “Transaction Costs and Antitrust Concerns in the Licensing of Intellectual Property”, J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 325 (2005). Charles Duhigg, “The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business”, Random House 2012. Gordon R. Foxall, “Foundations of consumer behaviour analysis”, Marketing Theory, Volume 1(2), 165–199, 192, Footnote 2 (2001). Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S.S. Kresge Co., 316 U.S. 203 (1942). John Wooden and Steve Jamison, “Wooden on Leadership”, McGraw-Hill (April 2005). James Surowiecki, “Dodger Mania”, The New Yorker, The Talk of the Town The Financial Page, July 11, 2011. Eric Schneiderman, “Going After Tax Cheats”, National Law Journal, June 11, 2012. Adrian Johns, “Piracy. The Intellectual Property Wars From Gutenberg to Gates”, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London (2009), p. 28. Milton Friedman, “Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962). Melvin Blecher, “Dominating Patents: a View from the Bridge”, CLIN. CHEM. 34/9, 1705-1708 (1988) Robert P. Merges and Richard R. Nelson, “On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope”, 90 Colum. L. Rev. 839, 860 (1990). Marvin B. Lieberman, David B. Montgomery, “First-Mover Advantages”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, Special Issue: Strategy Content Research. (Summer, 1988). Richard A. Posner, “Transaction Costs and Antitrust Concerns in the Licensing of Intellectual Property”, J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 325, 334 (2005). Abraham Lincoln, “Second Lecture on Discoveries and Inventions” (Feb. 11, 1859). “Solyndra Close To Filing Bankruptcy Plan”, Associated Press (June 15, 2012). KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007). Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company et al., 730 F.2d 1452 (CAFC 1984). Mike Lillis, “Foreign Auto Makers Won Billions in Government Subsidies”, The Washington Independent, December 16, 2008). Jill Ann Fryklund, “Vail Daily Letter: Tax the Visitor, Fine”, Vail Daily, June 3, 2012. National Bellas Hess v. Department of Revenue, 386 U.S. 753 (1967). Deborah Solomon, “U.S. to Resume Lease Sales for Oil Drilling in the Gulf”, The Wall Street Journal, August 20, 2011. “How You Earn Credits”, SSA Publication No. 05-10072, ICN 467510, Jan. 2012. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 50 (2010). Michael J. Sandel, “What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets”, Ferrar, Straus and Giroux (2012). Jennifer Medina, “Santa Monica Resets Its Parking Meter System”, The New York Times, June 12, 2012. Patrick Vlaskovits, “Henry Ford, Innovation, and That ‘Faster Horse’ Quote”, HBR Blog Network, August 29, 2011. Mark A. Lemley, “The Myth of the Sole Inventor”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 110:709-760 (March 2012). Robert M. Kunstadt and Ilaria Maggioni, “A Proposed ‘U.S. Public Patent Pool’”, les Nouvelles, March 2011, p. 10. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/47432 |