From state to market revisited: more empirical evidence on the efficiency of public (and privately-owned) enterprises

Mühlenkamp, Holger (2013): From state to market revisited: more empirical evidence on the efficiency of public (and privately-owned) enterprises.

Abstract

For several decades public enterprises have been criticised for their poor economic performance. Many economists take it as “conventional wisdom” that publicly owned enterprises are inefficient by their very nature. This seemed to be proved by what is probably the most cited survey worldwide, that was written by Megginson and Netter (2001). They claim: “Research now supports the proposition that privately owned firms are more efficient and more profitable than otherwise-comparable state-owned firms” (p. 380). The objective of this paper is to question the proposition that public enterprises are necessarily less efficient as their private counterparts. In doing so, we argue that profits are not a reasonable performance measure for public enterprises. However, our main focus is to present a much more comprehensive review of the empirical evidence than was provided by Megginson and Netter. The evidence indicates that these authors’ conclusions were biased in favour of privatization despite the evidence indicating that the true picture is much more differentiated.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Public enterprises, publicly provided goods, efficiency, privatization, firm performance
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H42 - Publicly Provided Private Goods; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises

References

Aharoni, Y. 2000. The performance of state-owned enterprises. In: P.A. Toninelli, ed. The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49-72.

Alchian, A.A., 1965. Some economics of property rights. Il Politico, 30, 816-829.

Arcas, M.-J. and Bachiller, P. 2010. Operating performance of privatized firms in Europe: organizational and environmental factors. International Journal of Public Administration, 33, 487-498.

Backhaus, J.G. 1994. Assessing the performance of public enterprises: a public-choice approach. European Journal of Law and Economics, 1, 275–287.

Bel, G. and Costas, A. 2006. Do public sector reforms get rusty?: local privatization in Spain. The Journal of Policy Reform, 9 (1), 1-24.

Bel, G. and Warner, M.E. 2008. Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs?: a review of empirical studies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52 (12), 1337-1348.

Bel, G., Fageda, X., and Warner, M.E. 2010. Is private production of public services cheaper than public production?: a meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29 (3), 553–577.

Bennet, J.T. and Johnson, M.H. 1979. Public versus private provision of collective goods and services: garbage collection revisited. Public Choice, 34, 55-63.

Bennet, J.T. and Johnson, M.H. 1980. Tax reduction without sacrifice: private-sector production of public services. Public Finance Quarterly, 8 (4), 363-396.

Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.

Boardman, A.E. and Vining, A.R. 1989. Ownership and performance in competitive environments: a comparison of the performance of private, mixed and state-owned enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, 32 (19), 1-33.

Bös, D. 1991. Privatization: a theoretical treatment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Borcherding, T.E., Pommerehne, W.W., and Schneider, F. 1982. Comparing the efficiency of private and public production: a survey of the evidence from five federal states. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, (Supplement 2), 127-156.

Bortolotti, B., D’Souza, J., Fantini, M., and Megginson, W.L. 2000. Sources of performance improvement in privatized firms: a clinical study of the global telecommunications industry, University of Oklahoma Department of Finance Working Paper, FEEM Working Paper no. 26.2001.

Bortolotti, B. and Milella, V. 2008. Privatization in Western Europe: stylized facts, outcomes, and open issues. In: G. Roland, ed. Privatization: Successes and Failures. New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press, 32-75.

Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.-C., and Guedhami, O. 2005. Liberalization, corporate governance and the performance of privatized firms in developing countries. Journal of Corporate Fi-nance, 11 (5), 767-790.

Boyd, C.W. 1986. The comparative efficiency of state-owned enterprises, In: A.R. Negandhi, T.H. Rao, and K.L.K. Negandhi, eds. Multinational Corporations and State-owned Enterprises. Greenwich: JAI-Press, 179-194.

Bradburd, R. 1996. Privatization of natural monopolies: a reply. Review of industrial organization, 11, 883-887.

Carvalho, P., Marques, R.C., and Berg, S. 2012. A meta-regression analysis of benchmarking studies on water utilities market structure. Utilities Policy, 21, 40-49.

Cavaliere, A. and Scabrosetti, S. 2008. Privatization and efficiency: from principals and agents to political economy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22 (4), 685-710.

Ceriani, L. and Florio, M. 2010. Consumer surplus and the reform of network industries: a primer. Journal of Economics, 102, 111-122.

De Alessi, L. 1974. The economic analysis of government ownership and regulation: theory and evidence from the electric power industry. Public Choice, 19 (1), 1-42.

De Alessi, L. 1980. The economics of property rights: a review of the evidence. Research in Law and Economics, 2, 1-47.

De Fraja, G. 1993. Productive efficiency in public and private firms. Journal of Public Eco-nomics, 50, 15-30.

Djankov, S. and Murrell, P. 2002. Enterprise restructuring in transition: a quantitative survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 739-792.

Domberger, S. and Pigott, J. 1986. Privatization policies and public enterprise: a survey. The Economic Record, 62 (June), 145-162. Also published In: M. Bishop, J. Kay, and C. Mayer, eds. 1994. Privatization and Economic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32-61.

Estrin, S., Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E., and Svejnar, J. 2009. The effects of privatization and ownership in transition economies. Journal of Economic Literature, 47 (3), 699-728.

Florio, M. 2004. The great divestiture: evaluating the welfare impact of the British privatizations 1979-1997, Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

Foreman-Peck, J. and Waterson, M. 1985. The comparative efficiency of public and private enterprise in Britain: electricity generation between the world wars. The Economic Journal, 95 (Supplement), 83-95.

Foreman-Peck, J. and Millward, R. 1994. Public and private ownership of British industry 1820-1990. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Frey, B.S. 1997. On the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic work motivation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15 (4), 427-440.

Hart, O., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W. 1997. The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4), 1127-1161.

Hirsch, W.Z. 1965. Cost functions of an urban government service: refuse collection. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47 (1), 87-92.

Hogde, G.A. 2000. Privatization: an international review of performance. Boulder: Westview Press.

Houston, D.J. 2000. Public service motivation: a multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10 (4), 713-727.

Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. 1991. Privatization and incentives. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7, 84-105.

Martin, S. and Parker, D. 1997. The impact of privatisation: ownership and corporate performance in the U.K., London: Routledge.

Megginson, W.L. and Netter, J.M. 2001. From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39 (2), 321-389.

Megginson, W.L. and Sutter, N.L. 2006. Privatisation in developing countries. Corporate Governance, 14 (4), 234-265.

Millward, R. 1982. The comparative performance of public and private ownership, In: E. Roll, ed. The Mixed Economy, London: Macmillan, 58-93.

Millward, R. and Parker, D. 1983. Public and private enterprise, comparative behaviour and relative efficiency, In: R. Millward, D. Parker, L. Rosenthal, M.T. Sumner, and N. To-pham, eds. Public Sector Economics, London and New York: Longman, 199-274.

Parker, D. 2003. Performance, risk and strategy in privatised, regulated industries: the UK’s experience. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16 (1), 75-100.

Parker, D. 2006. The UK’s privatization experiment: the passage of time permits a sober assessment. In: M. Köthenbürger, H.-W. Sinn, and J. Whalley, eds. Privatization Experiences in the European Union. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 365-398.

Parker, D. and Kirkpatrick, C. 2005: Privatisation in developing countries: a review of the evidence and the policy lessons. The Journal of Development Studies, 41, 513–541.

Pestieau, P. and Tulkens, H. 1993. Assessing and explaining the performance of public enterprises. Finanzarchiv, 50 (3), 293-323.

Pint, E.M. 1991. Nationalization vs. regulation of natural monopolies: the effects of ownership on efficiency. Journal of Public Economics, 44, 131-164.

Pommerehne, W.W. 1990. Genügt bloßes Reprivatisieren?, In: D. Aufderheide, ed. Deregulierung und Privatisierung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 27-63.

Rees, R. 1984. Public Enterprise Economics. 2. nd. ed., Oxford: Philip Allen.

Schmidt, K.M. 1996a. The costs and benefits of privatization: an incomplete contract approach. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 12 (1), 1-24.

Schmidt, K.M. 1996b. Incomplete contracts and privatization. European Economic Review, 40 (3), 569-579.

Shapiro, C. and Willig, R.D. 1990. Economic rationales for the scope of privatization, In: E.N. Suleiman and J. Waterbury, eds. The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization. Boulder CO, 55-87.

Shirley, M. and Walsh, P. 2000. Public versus private ownership: the current state of the debate, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, no. 2420.

Spann, R.M. 1977: Public versus private provision of governmental services, In: T.E. Borcherding, ed. Budgets and Bureaucrats: the Sources of Government Growth, Durham: Duke University Press, 71-89.

Stiglitz, J.E. 2008. Foreword, In: G. Roland, ed. Privatization: Successes and Failures. New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press, IV-XIV.

Verbrugge, J.A., Megginson, W.L., and Owens, W.L. 2000. State ownership and the financial performance of privatized banks: an empirical analysis, Presented at the World Bank/Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Conference on Banking Privatization, Washington, DC, March 15th & 16th , 1999.

Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G. 1988. Privatization: an economic analysis. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

Villalonga, B. 2000. Privatization and efficiency: differentiating ownership effects from political, organizational, and dynamic effects. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 42 (1), 43-74.

Vining, A.R. and Boardman, A.E. 1992. Ownership versus competition: efficiency in public enterprise. Public Choice, 73, No. 2, 205-239.

Willner, J. 2001. Ownership, efficiency, and political interference. European Journal of Political Economy, 17 (4), 723-748.

Wright, B.E. 2001. Public-sector work motivation: a review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11 (4), 559-586.

Yarrow, G. 1986. Privatization in theory and practice. Economic Policy, 1 (2), 323-377.