How to Facilitate Damage Claims? Private Enforcement of Competition Rules in Croatia – Domestic and EU Law Perspective

Pecotić Kaufman, Jasminka (2012): How to Facilitate Damage Claims? Private Enforcement of Competition Rules in Croatia – Domestic and EU Law Perspective. Published in: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies , Vol. 5(7), No. 2012 (2012): pp. 13-54.

Abstract

Ever since the Croatian Competition Agency started functioning in 1997, public enforcement of competition law has been the norm. Civil actions for breaches of competition law have been the exception in Croatia. The existing legislation in the area of competition law makes no effort to incentivise private enforcement. There are no specific rules in the Competition Act 2009 dedicated to civil actions, except a single provision that assigns jurisdiction over damages claims to commercial courts. General tort law is applicable in order to prove damages. A number of issues arise here mostly due to the complexity of competition cases. These issues were described in the European Commission’s White Paper on Damages Actions for Breach of EC Antitrust Rules (2008). The level of uncertainty as regards the outcome of the claim is high. It seems that special rules need to be adopted in Croatia in order to improve the position of the injured side. The paper deals with a number of procedural and substantive law issues relevant to the facilitation of civil proceedings for antitrust damages. A domestic law perspective is applied taking into account recent developments in EU competition law and policy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: private enforcement; Croatia; liability for damages; prejudicial question; binding effect; access to evidence; limitation periods; standing; indirect purchasers; passing-on defence; collective protection; harmful act; fault; causal link; types of harm; scope of damages
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law

References

Alfaro J., Reher T., ‘The European Commission’s Journey to a Directive on Damages Actions: One Step Forward – Two Steps Back!’ (2011) European Antitrust Review.

Baretić M., ‘Individualna i kolektivna zaštita potrošača u hrvatskom pravu’ [‘Individual and Collective Consumer Protection in Croatian Law’], [in:] V. Tomljenović, E. Čulinović Herc, V. Butorac Malnar (eds.), Republika Hrvatska na putu prema Europskom pravosudnom području: Rješenje trgovačkih and potrošačkih sporova [Republic Croatia on the Way Towards European Judicial Area: Solving Commercial and Consumer Cases], Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci, Rijeka, 2009, p. 241-285

Böge U., Ost K., ‘Up and running, or is it? Private enforcement – the situation in Germany and policy perspectives’ (2006) 27(4) European Competition Law Review.

Bukovac Puvača M., Butorac Malnar V., ‘Izvanugovorna odgovornost za štetu prouzročenu povredom pravila tržišnog natjecanja’ [‘Tort Liability for Damages Caused by Infringement of Competition Rules’] (2008) 8(12) Hrvatska pravna revija.

Butorac Malnar V., Petrović S., ‘Novo pravno uređenje tržišnog natjecanja’ [‘New Competition Rules Setup’], [in:] Zbornik 48. susreta pravnika [Collection of Papers of 48th Legal Conference], Opatija, 12-14 May 2010, Zagreb 2010.

Butorac Malnar V., Pecotić Kaufman J., ‘Ocjena koncentracija poduzetnika po kriteriju opadajućeg poslovanja u doba recesije’ [‘Assessment of Mergers of Undertakings and Failing Firm Defence in Times of Recession’] (2011) 61(4) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu.

Canenbley C., Steinvorth T., ‘Effective enforcement of competition law: is there a solution to the conflict between leniency programmes and private damages actions?’ (2011) 2(4) Journal of European Competition Law & Practice.

Crnić I., Parnični postupak i naknada štete – Primjena propisa o parničnom postupku u parnicama za naknadu štete i iz odnosa osiguranja [Civil Litigation and Compensation of Damage – Application of Rules on Civil Procedure in Damage and Insurance Claims], Organizator 2008.

Dika M., ‘“Prethodno pitanje” u parničnom postupku’ [‘”Prejudicial Issue” in Civil Litigation’] (2005) 26(1) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci.

Dika M., ‘Udružna tužba kao instrument apstraktne zaštite potrošača’ [‘Representative Action as an Instrument for Abstract Consumer Protection’] (2003) 3(10) Hrvatska pravna revija.

Drexl J., Conde B., Enchelmaier S., Mackenrodt M.-O., Podszun R., ‘European Commission-White Paper: Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules –Comments by the May Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law‘ (2008) 39(7) International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law.

Gorenc V., Zakon o obveznim odnosima s komentarom [Obligations Act with Commentary], RRiF 1998.

Grbin I., ‘Pravomoćnost odluka u parničnom postupku‘[‘Finality of Decisions in Civil Litigation’], [in:] Godišnjak no. 9/02 – 17. savjetovanje Aktualnosti hrvatskog zakonodavstva i pravne prakse [Yearbook no. 9/02 – 17th Conference on Novelties in Croatian Legislation and Legal Practice], available at http://www.vsrh.hr/CustomPages/Static/HRV/Files/IGrbin-Pravomocnost_odluka.pdf

Hilgenfeld M., ‘Private antitrust enforcement: towards a harmonized European model or a „patchwork“ of various member states’ rules’ (2008) 14(2) International Trade Law Review.

Klarić P., Vedriš M., Građansko pravo [Civil Law], Narodne novine 2006.

Kortman J., Swaak Ch., ‘The EC White Paper on antitrust damage actions’ (2009) 30(7) European Competition Law Review.

Pavlović M., ‘Značaj prejudicijelnih pitanja u parnici’ [‘Importance of Prejudicial Issues in Civil Litigation’] (2003) 3(7) Hrvatska pravna revija.

Triva S., Dika M., Građansko parnično procesno pravo [Civil Litigation Procedural Law], 7th ed., Narodne novine 2004.

Waller S. W., ‘Towards a constructive public-private partnership to enforce competition law’ (2006) 29(3) World Competition.

Wils W. P. J., ‘The Relationship between Public Antitrust Enforcement and Private Actions for Damages‘ (2009) 32(1) World Competition.