Yefimov, Vladimir (2003): Agrarian reform and subsistence agriculture in Russia. Published in: Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Central and Eastern Europe , Vol. 22, No. Subsistence Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe:How to Break the Vicious Circle? (January 2003): pp. 161-178.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_49056.pdf Download (362kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Russian agrarian reform failure is a direct result of ignoring the nature of agrarian institutions inherited from Soviet times and the application of a liberal neo-classical approach in the law making process. The most important problem which presents impediments to agrarian reform is the role of collective farms as the mechanisms of survival for rural communities. Rural dwellers understand very well that if former collective/state farms were substituted by real private enterprises, then they would lose access to resources from collective/state farms for their subsistence household farms, the only source of their survival. They also understand that only a minority of them could create agricultural businesses and the majority would not be employed in the new private agricultural enterprises. That is why they resist any transformation of their collective/state farms. They resist not as individuals, but as a community. So members of the community who wish to create private enterprises are under pressure from the community worried about subsistence household farms. Agrarian reform legislation provided rural dwellers with a very powerful tool for this resistance: privatisation of collective and state farms by members of these farms on an egalitarian basis. The authors of land reform legislation did not worry about that because they were neo-classical economists. They estimated that the most important thing is the right of owners of land and asset shares to buy and sell them. According to them, the inclusion of this right into legislation is sufficient to start a process of creation of viable agricultural enterprises on the land of former collective and state farms, with the subsequent concentration of land and other assets in the hands of the most efficient farmers. The reformers did not pay any attention to the institution of subsistence household farms.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Agrarian reform and subsistence agriculture in Russia |
English Title: | Agrarian reform and subsistence agriculture in Russia |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Agrarian reform legislation, neo-classical economics, collective/state farms, subsistence household farms, rural communities |
Subjects: | P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P31 - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P32 - Collectives ; Communes ; Agriculture |
Item ID: | 49056 |
Depositing User: | Dr Vladimir Yefimov |
Date Deposited: | 15 Aug 2013 12:14 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 15:35 |
References: | CHAYANOV, A.V. (ed.) (1928): Results of the Decade of Soviet Power in Figures 1917 – 1927, Moscow. CHAYANOV, A.V. (1966): The Theory of Peasant Economy, Homewood, Ill., Richard D. Irwin. DE CHOMBART LAUWE, J. (1961): Les paysans soviétiques, Editions du Seuil, Paris. IFC (1995): Land Privatization and Farm Reorganization in Russia, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. MENDRAS, H. (1995): Les sociétés paysannes, Editions Gallimard, Paris. NORTH, D. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. PASHOV, M.C. (ed.) (1999): Agrarian Legislation of the Russian Federation, Collection of Legislative Acts and Documents, Yurist, Moscow, (in Russian). PROSTERMAN, R., HANSTAD, T. (eds.) (1999): Legal Impediments to Effective Rural Land Relations in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, The World Bank Technical Paper, No. 436, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. SAHLINS, M. (1972): Stone Age Economics, Aldine-Alerton, New York. STALIN, J. (1952): Questions of Leninism, Politizdat, Moscow. WEGREN, S.K. (1998): Agriculture and the State in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsbugh. YEFIMOV, V. (1997): Approche institutionnelle de l'analyse de la transition (le cas de l'agriculture du Nord-Kazakhstan), Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest, Vol. 28, No. 2, Paris. YEFIMOV, V. (2001): Continuité et recomposition des régimes agraires russes dans le siècle, Economie et Société, Série: Développement, croissance et progrès, Développement – III, No. 9-10, ISMEA, Paris, pp. 1439-1476. YEFIMOV, V. (2002): Transformations agraires en Russie (Idéologies, législations, fonctionnement des institutions), PhD dissertation, IUED, Geneva University, 2002. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/49056 |