An Empirical Analysis of Audit Expectation Gap in Nigeria

Tanko, Muhammad (2011): An Empirical Analysis of Audit Expectation Gap in Nigeria.

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to establish whether or not the problem of audit expectation gap exist in Nigeria, and whether those areas of concern, (areas that brought about the misunderstanding between the public and the audit profession) could be identified and measures could be taken to either eliminate them or reduce them to the barest minimum. To achieve this, the paper developed questionnaire based on the method used in the literature. The process ensures that data is collected for the public’s expectation on the issues of the expectation gap on the one hand, and then subsequently and side by side, we compared the issues with the audit authorities’ required or expected perception. The data collected was analyzed using a five-point likert type scale anchored by a five scale from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”. Furthermore, to test for the significant expectation gap between the two groups of respondents, both the parametric and non parametric statistical tests were used. The paper found that there is expectation gap in the country as evidenced in the views of the respondents. The first issue investigated reveals that there is wide expectation gap between the views of the auditors and non auditors in terms of the quality of audit report. The inferential statistics which tests whether there is significant difference in the opinion of auditors and non-auditors on the improvement of company audit in Nigeria shows that there is significant difference in the mean opinion of auditors and non- auditors on the issues of the expectation gap. The paper therefore concluded that there is wide gap on the understanding of the role of the auditors by the public. Based on the findings of the paper, we recommended that there is the need for continued sensitization of the public, by both the auditing profession and other stake holders on the role and duties of the auditor to avoid unreasonable expectation by the public.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Auditor’s Perception, Public Perception & Audit Expectation Gap.
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M42 - Auditing

References

Adams A. and Evans R. (2004): Accountability, Completeness, Credibility and the Auditing Expectation Gap. Greenleaf Publishing, JCC 14 Summer.

Adams Committee. (1977): Role of the Auditor, Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.

Beattie, v., Brandt, R. & Fearnley, S. (1999): “‘Perceptions of Auditor Independence: UK Evidence”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol.8, No.1, pp: 67-107.

Best P J, Buckby S & Tan C. (2001): “Evidence of The Audit expectation Gap in Singapore” Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol .16, No .3 pp: 134-144.

Carey,L. (1970): The Rise of the Accounting Profession: To Responsibility and Authority, 1937-1969 (New York,).

Chenok, P.B. (1994): Perception vs. Reality, Journal of Accountancy. pp: 47-51.

Chowdhury, R, Innes,J and Kouhy, R. (2005): “The Public Sector Audit Expectation Gap in Bangladesh”, Managerial Auditing Journal,Vol.20, No.8,pp: 893-908.

Chowdhury,R ,Jnnes , J & Kouhy , R. (2005): “The Public Sector Audit Expectation Gap in Bangladesh”, Managerial Auditing Journal.Vol.20,No.8,pp:893-908.

Cohen Commission. (1978): Report of the Commission on Auditor Reasonability’s: Conclusions and Recommendations. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accounts.

Cross Committee. (1977): Report of the Committee Under the Chairmanship R1. Hon the Lord Cross of Chelsea, Accountancy, 160, pp: 80-86.

CICA (1998): Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants DeAngelo, L.E. (1981): “Auditor Size and Audit Quality”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.3, August, pp: 183-199.

Dunmore P.V Z & Falk, H. (2001): Joint Provision of Audit and Non-audit Services, Audit Pricing and Auditor Independence, WP.

Fadzly ,M. Z & Ahmad,Z (2004): Audit Expectation Gap: The case of Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 19. No. 7.

Fadzly ,M & Ahmad,Z (2003): “The Perceived Value of Financial Statement Audit” , Proceeding of The International Conference on Quality Financial Reporting Corporate Governance, kuala Lumpur,Malaysia. 16

FEE :( 1995): Auditor Independence and Objectivity, Position Paper. Bruseels.

Flint, D. (1988): Philosophy and Principles of Auditing, An Introduction. Macmillan. London

Fried, D, & Schiff, A. (1981): “CPA Switches and Associated a Market Reactions”, The Accounting Review, April, pp. 326-341.

Gill G, and Cosserat G.. (1996): Modern Auditing in Australia, Fourth Edition Wiley and Sons Australia.

Greenside Committee, (1978): “Report of the Joint Committee Appointed to Consider the Cross report and related Matters”, journal of Accountancy. Vol. 161, pp; 124-132

Guy. D. & Suilivan, J. (1988): “The Expectations Gap in Auditing Standards”, Journal of Accountancy.Vol.165, pp: 36-46.

Hille. (1993): “Expanding the New Zealand Audit report”, Accountants Journal, pp: 59-61.

Hopwood, A.G.. (1990): “Ambiguity, Knowledge and Territorial Claims: Some Observations on the Doctrine of Substance over Form-S Review essay”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 22, No.1

Humphrey, C., Moizer, P., and Turley, S. (1992): The Audit Expectation Gap in the United Kingdom, Report prepared for the Auditing Research Foundation of the research board of the institute of chartered accountants in England and Wales, London, ICAEW.

Liggio, C.D. (1974): “The Expectation Gap: The Accountant’s Legal Waterloo”. Journal of Contemporary Business, Vol.3, No.3, pp: 27-44.

McEnroe, J. E., Martens, S. C. (2001): Auditor’s and Investors’ Perception of the “Expectation Gap. Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15 no. 4

Macdonald Commission. (1988): Report on the Commission to Study the Public’s expectation of Audits, Canada, Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.

Mtcalf Committee. (1976): The Accounting Establishment, Washington D C: United States Government Printing Office.

Mahdi S., Mansoury A., Azary Z. (2009): Audit Independence and Expectation Gap: Empirical evidences from Iran. International Journal of Economics and Finance Vol. 1, No. 1.

Barley K, Bylinki J and shields M (1983), “Effects of Audit Report Wording Changes on the Perceived Message”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.355 – 370.

Baron C D, Johnson D.A, Searfoss D.G and Smith C.H (1977), “Uncovering Corporate Irregularities: Are we Closing the Expectation Gap?, Journal of Accountancy, October, pp. 14-24.

Dewing I P and Russel P.O (2002), “UK Fund Managers, Audit Regulation and the New Accountancy Foundation: Towards a narrowing of the Audit Expectations Ga?” Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 17, No, PP. 53-545.

Epstein M. and Geiger M. (1994), “Investor Views of Audit Assurance: Evidence of the Expectation Gap”, Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 177, No. 1, pp. 60-66.

Frank K.E, Lowe D.J and Smith J.K (2001), “The Expectation Gap: Perceptual Differences Between Auditors, Jurors and Students”, Managerial Auditing Accounting Review, Vol. 3, pp. 45-150.

Gray G, Schelluch P. and Reid I (1997), “Users’ Perceptions of the Auditing Responsibilities for the Prevention, Detection and Reporting of Fraud, other Illegal Acts and Errors”, The Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 7, pp. 51-61.

Humphrey C. Moizer P. and Turley S. (1993), “The Audit Expectation Gap in Britain: An Empirical Investigation”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 23, pp. 395-411.

Lee T. A (1970), “The Nature of Auditing and its Objectives”, Accountancy, Vol. 81, pp. 292- 296.

Lowe D.J (1994), “The Expectation Gap in the Legal System: Perception Differences Between Auditors Judges”, Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 39 – 44.

Manson S. and Zaman M. (2001). “Auditor Communication in an Evolving Environment: Going Beyond SAS 600 Auditors’ Reports on Financial Statements”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 113-136.

Miller, Reed S. Strawser R (1990), “The New Auditor’s Report: Will it close the Expectation Gap in Communications?”, The CPA Journal, Vol. 60, pp. 68-72.

Monroe G and Woodliff D (1994), “An Empirical Investigation of the Audit Expectation Gap: Australian Evidence”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 34, pp. 47-74.

Nair R and Rittenbeng L (1987), “Messages Perceived from Audit, Review, and Compilation Reports: Extension to more Diverse Groups”, Auditing, A Journal of Practice and Theory, vol. 7, pp. 15-38.

Dewing , I.P and and Russell, P.O (2002). UK fund managers audit regulation and the new accounting foundation , Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 537 – 545.

Fazdly, M. N and Ahmad, Z. (2004). Audit Expectation Gap: The case of Malaysia, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 17 (7), pp. 897 – 915.

Gaa. J. C. (1991). The Expectations Game: Regulation of Auditors by Government and the profession, Critical Perceptive of Accounting, Vol. 2, pp. 83-107.

Gray, I and Manson, S. (2002). The Audit Process: Principles, Practice and Cases, London:Business Press Thomson Learning.

Humphrey, C., Moizer P. and Turley, S. (1992). The Audit expectations Gap – plus a change, plus c’est la meme chose? Critical Perceptive on Accounting, Vol. 3, pp. 137-61.

Porter, B. (1993). An Empirical Study of the Audit Expectations-Performance Gap, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 24, Winter, pp. 49-68.

Tricker, R.I. (1982). Corporate Accountability and the role of the Audit function, in Hopwood A. G.M. Broomwich and Shaw, J. (ed). Auditing Research: Issues and Opportunities, London: Pitman.