Compulsory tutorial programmes and performance in undergraduate microeconomics: A regression discontinuity design

Schöer, Volker and Shepherd, Debra (2013): Compulsory tutorial programmes and performance in undergraduate microeconomics: A regression discontinuity design.

Abstract

As South African universities experience extremely low graduation rates, academic staff implement a range of interventions, for instance tutorial programmes, in order to improve student performance. However, relatively little is known about the impact of such tutorial programmes on students’ performance. Using data from an introductory microeconomics course, this paper investigates the impact of a compulsory tutorial programme on students’ performance in their final examination. Due to the fact that the tutorial programme was only compulsory for students that obtained less than a pass in the first test, while otherwise offered on a voluntary basis, this paper employs a fuzzy RD design to investigate the impact of the tutorial programme on final exam performance. Findings indicate that assignment to the compulsory programme positively affects students’ performance. However, this result is mainly driven by students who already seem to have the ability to perform but, for whatever reason, underperformed in the first test. Thus, while assignment to the tutorial programme itself leads to an improvement in performance, the mechanism is unclear.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Peer tutoring, compulsory tutorial programme, introductory microeconomics, regression discontinuity design, South Africa
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics; A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A20 - General; A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate

References

BOUD, D., COHEN, R. and SAMPSON, J. (1999). Peer Learning and Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4): 413-426.

ENTWISTLE, N.J., THOMPSON, S. and TAIT, H. (1992). Guidelines for Promoting Effective Learning in Higher Education. University of Edinburgh: Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction.

ENTWISTLE, N., McCUNE, V. and WALKER, P. (2001)Conceptions, styles and approaches within higher education: analytic abstractions and everyday experience, in: R. J. Sternberg & L. F.Zhang (Eds) Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 103–136.

FAN, J. and GIJBELS, I. (1995). Adaptive order polynomial fitting: bandwidth robustification and bias reduction. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 4: 213-227.

GOLDSCHMID, B. and GOLDSCHMID, M.L. (1976). Peer teaching in higher education: a review. Higher Education, 5: 9-33.

GREENE, W.H. (2008). Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

HAHN, J., TODD, P. and VAN DER KLAAUW, W. (2001). Identication and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design. Econometrica, 69: 201-209

HECKMAN, J. and ROBB, R. (1985). Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions: An Overview. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1-2): 239-67.

IMBENS, G.W. and ANGRIST, J.D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2): 467-75.

IMBENS, G and KALYANARAMAN, K. (2010). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. CeMMAP working papers CWP05/10, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.

IMBENS, G. and LEMIEUX, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2): 615-635.

JACOBI, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4): 505-532.

JANSEN, A.I. and HORN, P.M. (2009). Tutorial classes – why bother? An investigation into the impact of tutorials on the performance of economics students. South African Journal of Economics, 77(1): 179-189.

JOHNSON, W.B. (2007). Student–faculty mentorship outcomes, pp. 189-210 in Blackwell handbook of mentoring, ed: T.D. Allen and L.T. Eby. Blackwell, Oxford.

KELLEY, A.C. and SWARTZ, C. (1976). Student-to-student tutoring in economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 8(1): 52-55.

LEE, R.E. (1988). Assessing retention program holding power effectiveness across smaller community colleges. Journal of College Student Development, 29(3): 255-262.

LEE, D.S. (2008). Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2): 675-697.

LEE, D.S. and LEMIEUX, T. (2010). Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2): 281–355.

LEKSEKA, M and MAILE, S. (2008). High University dropout rates: a threat to South Africa’s future. Human Science Research Council, 1-7.

MCCRARY, J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2): 698-714.

MAXWELL, M. (1990). Does tutoring help? A look at the literature. Review of Research in Developmental Education 7(4): 3-7.

MUNLEY, V.G., GARVEY, E. and MCCONNELL, M.J. (2010). The effectiveness of peer tutoring on student achievement at the university level. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 100: 277-282.

SCHMIDT, H.G. and MOUST, J.H.C. (1995). What makes a tutor effective? A structural-equations modelling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70(8): 708-714.

THISTLETHWAITE, D. and CAMPBELL, D. (1960). Regression-Discontinuity Analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology , 51: 309-317.

TOPPING, K.J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education 32: 321-345.

VAN DER KLAAUW, W. (2002). Estimating the Effect of Financial Aid Offers on College Enrollment: A Regression-Discontinuity Approach. International Economic Review, 43(4): 1249-1287

WHITMAN, N.A. (1988). Peer Teaching: To Teach Is To Learn Twice. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.