Power of Global Transnational Networks: Civilizing of World Order

Aliu, Armando and Aliu, Dorian (2013): Power of Global Transnational Networks: Civilizing of World Order. Published in: HeiDOK – The Heidelberg Document Repository (5 August 2013): pp. 1-10.

Abstract

Can be a world order shaped by equivalents in the framework of the supranational model of Europe with the same legitimacy and with the same effectiveness? In this study was argued that Civilizing World Order (CWO) by Transnational Norm-Building Networks (TNNs) should have the legitimacy and effectiveness of the European Union supranational order. In this context, the concept of decentration (supra: centralization and infra: decentralization) which includes the nexus of voice (democratic participation) and entitlement (legal-social rights and duties) was examined. In this study, as methodology, published secondary data and online resources were used in order to reinforce the hypothesis.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: TNNs, CWO, Legitimacy, Effectiveness, Sovereignty
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F0 - General > F01 - Global Outlook; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization; H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General; K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law; K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K33 - International Law; P - Economic Systems > P0 - General

References

Aliu, A. (2011). ‘Proyección y Planificación Estratégica en la Industria Turística: Enfoque comparativo y Modelo Híbrido.’ Estudios y Perspectivas en Turismo, 20(6): 1324-1344.

Aliu, A. (2012). ‘International Migration and the European Union Relations in the Context of a Comparison of Western Balkans and North African Countries: Controlling Migration and Hybrid Model.’ MPRA Paper No. 41102, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München, Retrieved from: <http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41102/>.

Aliu, A. (2013). ‘The Theory of Interhybridity: Socio-political Dimensions and Migration Experiences of Post-communist Western Balkan States.’ MPRA Paper No. 44056, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München, Retrieved from: <http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44056/>.

Anheier, H. K. and Seibel, W. (Eds.) (1990). The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organisations. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Anheier, H. K. and Toepler, S. (Eds.) (1999). Private Funds, Public Purpose: Philanthropic Foundations in International Perspective. New York: Kluwer.

Bills, D. (Ed.) (2010). Hybrid Organisations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Block, F. (2003). ‘Karl Polanyi and the Writing of the Great Transformation.’ Theory and Society, 32 (3): 275-306.

Boulin, J. Y., and Mückenberger, U. (2005). ‘Is the Societal Dialogue at the Local Level the Future of Social Dialogue?’ European Review of Labour and Research, 11 (3): 439-448.

Davutoğlu, A. (2001). Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.

Dingwerth, K., and Pattberg, P. (2006). ‘Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics.’ Global Governance, 12: 185-203.

Evers, A. (2005). ‘Mixed Welfare Systems and Hybrid Organisations: Changes in the Governance and Provision of Social Services.’ International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9/10): 737-748.

Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. (1st ed.) Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Habermas, J. (2007). ‘A Political Constitution For the Pluralist World Society?’ Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 34 (3): 331-343.

Habermas, J. (1998). ‘The European Nation-State: On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship.’ Translated by: Ciaran Cronin, Public Culture, 10 (2): 397-416.

Herman, E. S. and Chomsky, N. (1988). ‘Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.’ (1st ed.) New York: Pantheon Books.

Herrmann, P. (2011). ‘Multilevel Governance: Participatory Democracy and Civil Society’s Role in Governance in the Perspective of the Lisbon Treaty.’ Current Politics and Economics of Europe, 22(1): 27-42.

Hettne, B. (2005). ‘Beyond the “New” Regionalism.’ New Political Economy, 10 (4): 543-571.

Hettne, B. (2004). ‘Karl Polanyi and the Search for World Order.’ Karl Polanyi Institute of Political Economy, Retrieved from: <http://polanyi.concordia.ca/pdfs/Hettne-2004.pdf>.

Hirschman, A. O. (1993). ‘Exit, Voice, and the Fate of the German Democratic Republic: An Essay in Conceptual History.’ World Politics, 45 (2): 173-202.

Hudson, A. (2001). ‘NGOs’ Transnational Advocacy Networks: from Legitimacy to Political Responsibility?’ Global Networks, 1 (4): 331-352.

Jakobeit, C., Kappel, R., and Mückenberger, U. (2010). ‘Civilizing the World Order? The Scope and Potential of Transnational Norm-building Networks.’ GIGA Working Paper Nr.1, Retrieved from: < http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/gf_international_1001.pdf>.

Keck, M. E., and Sikkink, K. (1999). ‘Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics.’ International Social Science Journal, 51 (159): 89-101.

La Torre, M. (2002). ‘Legitimacy for a Supranational European Political Order: Derivative, Regulatory or Deliberative.’ Ratio Juris, 15 (1): 63-83.

Menon, A., and Weatherill, S. (2008). ‘Transnational Legitimacy in a Globalising World: How the European Union Rescues its States.’ West European Politics, 31 (3): 397-416.

Mückenberger, U. (2008). ‘Civilising Globalism: Transnational Norm-Building Networks - A Research Programme.’ GIGA Working Paper Nr.90, Retrieved from: <http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download. php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/wp90_mueckenberger.pdf>.

Mückenberger, U., and Jastram, S. (2010). ‘Transnational Norm-Building Networks and the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 97: 223-239.

Mückenberger, U. (2012). ‘Globalisation and European Governance.’ Euromaster Programme – Lecture Materials, Hamburg: Hamburg University.

Oxford English Dictionary (2009). (2nd ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. (2nd Beacon Paperback ed.) Boston: Beacon Press.

Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. (1st ed.) New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Trubek, D. M., Mosher, J., and Rothstein, J. R. (2000). ‘Transnationalism in the Regulation of Labor Relations: International Regimes and Transnational Advocacy Networks.’ Law and Social Inquiry, 25 (4): 1187-1211.

Walker, N. (Ed.) (2003). Sovereignty in Transition. (1st ed.) Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Wuthnow, R. (1979). ‘Legitimating the Capitalist World Order.’ The American Journal of Sociology, 85 (2): 424-430.

Zürn, M., and Checkel, J. T. (2005). ‘Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State.’ International Organisation, 59 (4): 1045-1079.

Zürn, M. (2004). ‘Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems.’ Government and Opposition, 39 (2): 260-287.