Zulfiqar, Salyha (2012): Analyzing the Input Output Relationship of Small and Medium Enterprises in Pakistan: An Econometric Approach. Published in: International Journal of Business and Economic Development , Vol. 1, No. 1 (March 2013): pp. 66-73.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_50069.pdf Download (373kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The establishment and promotion of the SMEs is considered to be the solution to many of the problems of the developing economies. This SME panacea compels the researchers to observe how this sector contributes in the economy of Pakistan. The core objective of the present paper remains to analyze the Input output relationship in this sector. So the study contains the productivity analysis of the small and medium scale manufacturing sector of Pakistan. This will unleash the role of the various inputs in production here. Extended Cobb Douglas Production Function has been utilized on the secondary, cross section data of the 3-digit forty eight SMEs of Pakistan for the year 2005-2006.Different variables like labor male and female, local and imported material, sales tax, excise duty, advertisement and capital are selected to analyze their effects on output of SMEs. Most of the variables are significant having expected relationship with output, however female labor both production and non-production have shown negative relationship with output. Heteroscedasticity is checked by White test, concluding no evidence found for its presence in the data. The policy recommendations are that government should play a vital role in hand holding and development of SMEs in Pakistan so that productivity of factors of production can be increased. Especially the measures should be taken to increase the productivity of women who make 52% of Pakistan’s population.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Analyzing the Input Output Relationship of Small and Medium Enterprises in Pakistan: An Econometric Approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | SMEs, Extended Cobb Douglas production function, Productivity, Heteroscedasticity |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D20 - General |
Item ID: | 50069 |
Depositing User: | Ms. Salyha Zulfiqar |
Date Deposited: | 24 Sep 2013 02:30 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 07:15 |
References: | Admassie, A .and Matambalya, F. (2002). Technical Efficiency of Small and Medium Enterprises: Evidence from a Survey of Enterprises in Tanzania, MUSE Project. Brown, M. (1966).On the Theory and Measurement of Technological Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cobb, C. W. and Douglas, P. (1928). Theory of Production. American Economic Review, 139-65. Dipa, M. (2004), Productivity in the Small Manufacturing Enterprises: Determinants and Policy Issues, Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) Paper No. 4867 Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 120(3): 253-290. Greene, W. H. (1992). Econometric Analysis. New York, MacMillan Publishing Company. Government of Pakistan, Pakistan Economic Survey Various Issues, Islamabad, Ministry Of Finance. Government of Pakistan, Census of Manufacturing, (2005-06). Islamabad: Federal bureau of Statistics. Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw Hill, Inc. 3rd Edition. Hsu, M. and Chen, B. (2000). Labor Productivity of Small and Large Manufacturing Firms: The Case of Taiwan, Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol.18, No. 3, Pp270-283 Kumar, M. and Basu, P. (2008). Perspectives of Productivity Growth in Indian Food Industry: A Data Envelopment Analysis, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. Vol.57 No.7, Pp.503-522 Khalil, A.M. (2002).A Cross Section Estimate of Translog Production Function: Jordanian Manufacturing Industry. Topics in Middle Eastern and North African Economies.Vol 7. Le, V. and Harvie, C. (2010). How Do Vietnamese SMEs Perform? Technical Efficiency of SMEs in the Manufacturing Sector and Its Sub Sectors, Faculty of Commerce – Economics. (Working Paper) Majumder, R. (2004). Productivity Growth in Small Enterprises-Role of Inputs, Technological Progress and Learning by doing, MPRA Paper No.4848 Samuelson, P. and Douglas, P. (1979). Measurement of Production Functions and Marginal Productivities. Journal of Political Economy, 923-39 Sandelin, B. ( 1976). On the Origin of the Cobb-Douglas Production Function, Economy and History.19 (2) 117-25. SME Policy (2007). Small and Medium Enterprises and Development Authority (SMEDA) Publications. Available at website: www.smeda.org.pk Taymaz, E. (2005). Are Small Firms Really Less Productive? Small Business Economics 25, Pp.429-445 Wengel, J. and Rodriguez, E. (2006). SMEs Export Performance in Indonesia after the Crisis, Small Business Economics. 26, Pp.25-37 Zahid, Z.and Mokhtar,M.(2007). Estimating Technical Efficiency of Malaysian Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises: A Stochastic Frontier Modeling, The 4th SMEs in a Global Economy Conference, University of Wollongong, 9-10 July |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/50069 |